Here’s LaRose promising, in 2018, that “I want my party to win elections because we have better candidates and better ideas - not because we use modern GIS mapping software…to draw district lines better than the other party.”
When it came to drop boxes, while LaRose publicly said he wanted more of them (but wasn’t allowed to by law—a lie), his team privately consulted with a notorious vote suppressor as they came up w an arbitrary rule of one drop box per county.
Even when courts ruled he COULD add drop boxes (against his and Trump’s absurd argument that he couldn’t under Ohio law), LaRose broke that broken promise and only allowed one per county—at the same location of early, in-person voting.
It led to the outcome you’d expect:
6/
LaRose spews disinformation at the drop of a hat, when asked to or when it helps him.
Early in the 2018 cycle, he smeared veteran and House candidate @HillaryMueri based on a GOP allegation that she’d voted twice in an election:
LaRose said it was “the exact type of violation I would refer to the Atty Genl for investigation…[L]aw breakers who demonstrate this level of poor judgment devalue that right when they abuse the process.”
He said this as the chief elex official
8/
It turns out, the allegation was completely false. A result of government error.
LaRose has never apologized for his disgraceful, partisan attack against a woman who put her life in the line for this nation.
And he has amplified the Big Lie—subtly, as in his re-election kick-off video, or not subtly, as in a tweet a few days ago where he says Trump is right about voter fraud, especially “in other states where laws & leaders are weak”
10/
Bottom line: we have to go way beyond Trump when it comes to discerning who supports democracy and who doesn’t
LaRose is a case study of officials all over the country who may not sound or act like Trump, but who are willing to violate the law to attack democracy or voters.
11/
I’m so inspired by LaRose’s behavior today, I’ve decided to provide free copies of the introduction of my book, which walks through his outrageous drop box behavior in more detail, to anyone interested.
Text pepper to 33777 to get the intro sent your way.
Carry on!
END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You want to read a Court decision absolutely throttling an out-of-control legislature that refuses follow the law but thinks Ohio voters are too dumb to figure them out?
"...the map drawers & the commission knew that their approach—starting w the invalidated map & switching competitive GOP-leaning districts to competitive Dem-leaning districts—would have the dual effect of eliminating weak GOP districts & creating weak Dem districts.
2/
"DiRossi and Springhetti still ultimately drafted the plan, and they answered only to Senate President Huffman and House Speaker Cupp. As before, “the commission itself did not engage in any map drawing or hire independent staff to do so.”
3/
The rules greatly constrained what they could do re Cincinnati. Thank the voters for that, not the legislators.
The heist was in then carving Hamilton county 3 ways, carving out Dem north central parts of the county and placing them in the 8th district to offset the
Late last night, those challenging the latest round of maps filed objections which made an incredibly strong argument about how Huffman and his gang of lawbreakers once again violated the Constitution.
1. “the Commission chose once again to engage in a highly secretive, one-sided partisan process, [and] employed technical maneuvers to flout notice requirements….the Commission did not make data use relying the [plan] available until after its adoption….”
2/
2. In response to questions about the GOP map, “Co-chair Cupp jumped in to assert that the map-drawers had ‘given the answer that they can give’ and abruptly recessed the meeting.”
“As soon as the meeting resumed, Huffman immediately moved to adopt the [] proposal.”
3/
new Russia, my primary assignment for Dr. Brzezinski was to do deep and continuing research on the “new” Ukraine. It’s politics. Economics. Etc.
No one else was talking about Ukraine. But it’s all he wanted me to do.
Regular reports & a longer paper
(Before the Internet)
2/
He then explained it.
As he said then, Ukraine is the key. If Ukraine is a strong country that stands on its own, Russia will remain within its borders and not be tempted to return to its past expansionist ways.
But a weakened Ukraine risks an expansionist Russia
3/
For Manchin to use the underdog Ohio effort—still not over—to justify not fulfilling HIS constitutional duty to guarantee democracy in states is truly cynical
If you’re gonna use our victory for your ends, Senator, come talk to those who led that effort
We’ll fill you in on all the attacks on democracy we’re fighting. Where we’ve fought back. Where we haven’t been able to.
And if you’re going to mention our success in striking those rigged maps down, know that that success in court occurred…
2/
because we added language to our constitution that sets clear rules on how to draw those districts
Those rules are quite similar to the rules in the Freedom to Vote Act, meaning people in all states would have a chance for fair districts as we may have here if we succeed
3/