“Shellenberger … said police asked if he, in turn, wanted to file a complaint.
“I said ‘no’ despite the fact that it is an illegal and unethical experiment being done on our most vulnerable citizens.” sfchronicle.com/sf/article/San…
“I was in the linkage center monitoring it as is my right as a citizen,’ Shellenberger said. “I was covering a secret and illegal medical experiment. I was evicted from the site.”
Glad to see it only took the @sfchronicle 12 hours to catch up to my reporting this time. Last time it took 5 days.
The article claims “Access to the center remains strictly limited in an effort to preserve a sense of privacy for the people utilizing its services….
In truth, they’re hiding it because it’s a grotesque and illegal medical experiment on our most vulnerable citizens.
“It opened last month, but quickly attracted controversy following reports — first published by Shellenberger — that people at the center were permitted to use drugs inside the fenced-in area that separates the seven-story building from U.N. Plaza.”
I appreciate the Chron has been gracious in crediting us for the scoop. For the record, it was a team effort involving @lwoodhouse@EricaJSandberg@JennyGShao
Also, the fenced, supervised drug addiction site is *inside* — not separate from — UN Plaza
People say lack of housing forces local residents into the streets, but James says he came from Texas to San Francisco for the drugs, the non-enforcement of anti-camping laws, and the $820/month in welfare & food stamps. James says he sold fentanyl, 2 weeks ago, to a 15-year-old.
It's reasonable to ask whether I'm seeking out outliers, but I met James 5 minutes after parking my car and he was the first person I interviewed, and Ben, below, was the 4th person we interviewed after ~20 minutes on the street doing interviews
People are surprised by these interviews because much of what we've read is propaganda put forward by activists with an agenda & reporters who are also ideological but also lazy & too scared to ask direct questions of street people.
I agree addicts have to decide to quit, but they are more likely to quit when when loved ones intervene and when they have to obey the law. When we don't enforce the laws against public drug use, defecation, and camping, we enable, normalize, & increase addiction.
Yes, addicts have to hit bottom before they'll quit, but San Francisco and other progressive cities keep lowering the bottom. They don't enforce laws against addicts. They give them cash and housing. And now they are giving addicts their own drug use areas downtown.
This isn't complicated. In Europe, addicts and the mentally ill are expected to take responsibility for their health and their cities. They are not excused of those duties. To boil it down:
The people operating San Francisco's supervised drug addiction site say they're trying to save lives, but a government insider tells me, "People die in supervised drug sites all the time. They just register place of death as the hospital or ambulance."
San Francisco Mayor @LondonBreed , Sen. @Scott_Wiener & SF Sup. @MattHaneySF claim supervised addiction sites prevent overdose deaths but there is ZERO evidence from anywhere that they do that.
Moreover, the sites may in fact INCREASE overdoes & poisoning deaths.
Far more people who overdose are revived and survive than die.
That's the situation right NOW *outside* the supervised drug addiction site.
During the last decade, as Canada created supervised addiction sites, its OD and poisoning deaths from illicit drugs *increased.*
In December, when Mayor @LondonBreed said she'd put an end to all the "bullshit" destroying San Francisco, I applauded. I was naive to do so. Instead of ending the bullshit, she's doubled down on it.
Over the past two years, more than 1,360 people have died from drug overdoses in San Francisco. That is more than double the number who have died from Covid.
But you don’t need more stats. You don’t need more numbers about how the tent encampments are exploding. Or about the amount of money that the city is paying for each person doing drugs on the sidewalks. You need to see it.
Some people accused me of manipulating the videos I tweeted out yesterday of my interview with Ben, who has been a homeless heroin addict on the streets of San Francisco for 7 years.
My colleague @lwoodhouse has posted unedited videos of Ben saying the same things — and more
"I was an addict way before" moving to SF, says Ben
"Out here, the big problem is these kids 18 or 19 years old who 6 months ago were smoking weed and they smoke fentanyl a couple of times and it's shitty and makes the scene weirder."
People blame the pandemic for increasing crime & homelessness but Sheriff Villanueva of Los Angeles, a Democrat, says two of the biggest causes were letting 28,000 people out of prison and Gov. @GavinNewsom inviting homeless to come to California from out-of-state
"If you're on Skid Row [in L.A.], it's about a 100% certainty, if you're female, you're going to be raped, or they call "romancing," on the street. And you'll be a victim multiple times."
This vulnerable, psychotic woman we saw on Skid Row last week broke my heart.
Why do we let mentally ill & drug addicted young women get repeatedly raped on Skid Row and the Tenderloin?
Because that's what progressive politicians & "advocates for the homeless" demand