Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Michael Veale @mikarv@someone.elses.computer Profile picture
@mikarv
Feb 8, 2022 • 10 tweets • 5 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
The French presidency of the Council sent a compromise text on arts 16-29 of the EU AI Act, leaked to @Contexte. My analysis below: Thread 1/
To get caught up, previous thread on Council changes tranche 1:
And tranche 2:
Some changes altering technical documentation requirements, but these just trickle-down impacts from the Presidency's bigger attempt to exempt SMEs from having to fulfil specific legal documentation requirements in their previous edits (see prev thread: )
Amidst some text-shuffling, organisations no longer become "providers" for modifying the purpose of a high-risk system on the market. Seems bad but I suppose if they modified a system that was high risk into non high risk purpose, shouldn't be providers, and other criteria wide.
If outside the Union, you needed an authorised provider. French amendments make them both responsible for snitching on their bosses if they break the regulation and jointly and severally liable under the Product Liability Directive. Importers have to check an auth rep exists.
In a welcome move, the French actually put some direct human oversight roles on users, rather than having them all flow from the (potentially shoddy) technical documentation the providers make, which could have left users not liable if they had providers not scared of enforcement
Footnote worthy, French also keen on putting a number to the length of logging in a couple of places; this is something the CNIL likes to do (and has done re the Law Enforcement Directive art 25 unlike many Member States, I have a forthcoming chapter on logging in the LED...).
Unless I've missed something huge this is an update without many of the shocks and/or fireworks of the previous ones. Credit to @Contexte for obtaining the document.
has been pointed out to me that indeed as indicated this is not a big change as 2(23) even in the presidency version means substantial modification includes change of purpose.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Michael Veale @mikarv@someone.elses.computer

Michael Veale @mikarv@someone.elses.computer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mikarv

Michael Veale @mikarv@someone.elses.computer Profile picture
Nov 20, 2023
How do and should model marketplaces hosting user-uploaded AI systems like @HuggingFace @GitHub & @HelloCivitai moderate models & answer takedown requests? In a new paper, @rgorwa & I provide case studies of tricky AI platform drama & chart a way forward. osf.io/preprints/soca…
Moderating Model Marketplaces: Platform Governance Puzzles for AI Intermediaries. The AI development community is increasingly making use of hosting intermediaries such as Hugging Face that provide easy access to user-uploaded models and training data. These model marketplaces lower technical deployment barriers for hundreds of thousands of users, yet can be used in numerous potentially harmful and illegal ways. In this article, we argue that AI models, which can both `contain' content and be open-ended tools, present one of the trickiest platform governance challenges seen to date. We prov...
@huggingface @github @HelloCivitai @rgorwa There are a growing number of model marketplaces (Table). They can be hosting models that can create clear legal liability (e.g. models that can output terrorist manuals or CSAM). They are also hosting AI that may be used harmfully, and some are already trying to moderate this. Image
@huggingface @github @HelloCivitai @rgorwa Models can memorise content and reproduce it. They can also piece together new illegal content that has never been seen before. To this end, they can be (and some regimes would) equate them with that illegal content. But how would marketplaces assess such a takedown request?
Read 23 tweets
Michael Veale @mikarv@someone.elses.computer Profile picture
Aug 19, 2022
Int’l students are indeed used to subsidise teaching. High quality undergraduate degrees cost more than £9250 to run (always have in real terms), but were been subsidised by both govs (now rarely) & academic pay cuts. If int’l students capped, what fills the gap @halfon4harlowMP?
Tuition fees are a political topic because they’re visible to students, but the real question is ‘how is a degree funded’? The burden continues to shift from taxation into individual student debt, precarious reliance on int’l students, and lecturer pay.
Universities like Oxford distort the narrative too. College life is largely, often subsidised by the college endowment and assets, by the past. The fact so much of the political class went to a university with a non replicable funding model compounds issues hugely.
Read 4 tweets
Michael Veale @mikarv@someone.elses.computer Profile picture
Aug 19, 2022
Users of the Instagram app should today send a subject access request email to Meta requesting a copy of all this telemetry ‘tap’ data. It is not provided in the ‘Download Your Information’ tool. Users of other apps in the thread that do this (eg TikTok) can do the same.
Form: m.facebook.com/help/contact/5…
Say you are using Art 15 GDPR to access a copy of data from in-app browsers, including all telemetry and click data for all time. Say it is not in ‘Download your Information’. Link to Krause’s post for clarity. Mention your Instagram handle.
If you have trouble getting it (you will) you can return and ask for tips here, or read our thoughts & regulators’ views on flawed common refusals:
@Jausl00s + me, ‘Researching with Data Rights’: techreg.org/article/view/1…
@EU_EDPB (consultation doc) edpb.europa.eu/system/files/2…
Read 4 tweets
Michael Veale @mikarv@someone.elses.computer Profile picture
Jul 18, 2022
The Data Protection and Digital Information Bill contains a lot of changes. Some were previewed in the June consultation response. Others weren't. Some observations: 🧵
Overshadowing everything is an ability for the Secretary of State to amend anything they feel like about the text of the UK GDPR through regulations, circumventing Parliamentary debate. This should not happen in a parliamentary democracy, is an abuse of powers, and must not pass.
Article 22, around automated decision-making, is gone, replaced by three articles which in effect say that normal significant, automated decisions are never forbidden but get some already-present safeguards; decisions based on ethnicity, sexuality, etc require a legal basis.
Read 15 tweets
Michael Veale @mikarv@someone.elses.computer Profile picture
Jul 18, 2022
No legislation envisaged, just v general "cross-sectoral principles on a non-statutory footing". UK gov continues its trend of shuffling responsibility for developing a regulatory approach onto the regulators themselves, while EU shuffles it onto private standards bodies.
Meanwhile, regulators are warned not to actually do anything, and care about unspecified, directionless innovation most of all, as will be clearer this afternoon as the UK's proposed data protection reforms are perhaps published in a Bill.
Read 5 tweets
Michael Veale @mikarv@someone.elses.computer Profile picture
May 13, 2022
By my calculations, @officestudents' "unexpected" first class degrees model they calc grade inflation with uncritically expects a white, non-mature/disabled female law student to have a 40.5% chance of a First; the same Black student to have 15.4% chance. theguardian.com/education/2022…
The data is hidden in Table 6 of the annex to the report here officeforstudents.org.uk/publications/a… (requires you to add up the model estimates, do inverse log odds) Image
(I also used the 2020-21 academic year but you can choose your own)
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(