alexandre afonso Profile picture
Feb 8, 2022 23 tweets 7 min read Read on X
A thread about social privilege in the Netherlands.
J. Luyendijk has a new book in which he argues that Dutch society is dominated by people with 7 characteristics:
1. male
2. white
3. at least one highly educated parent
4. at least one parent born in NL
5. straight
6. had classics education in high school
7. university educated
I thought I would try to see if there was a way to measure this with data: how privileged are people with these characteristics in the Netherlands? How many people are there who "tick" the 7 boxes?
This is interesting because the Netherlands presents itself, and is perceived, as an egalitarian society.
So I used the three latest rounds of the European Social Survey. europeansocialsurvey.org
I have 4'858 Dutch respondents who completed the ESS in 2014, 2016, and 2018.
Let's start with the easy part . Checkmark 1: 49.2 % are men ✓
There is data on ethnic background too. Checkmark 2: 92.6 % are white (say that they are not part of an ethnic minority) ✓
Checkmark 3: 28.6% have at least one highly educated parent ✓
Checkmark 4: there is no data on where respondents' parents were born but data on ancestry. Here I can use whether people have Dutch ancestry on either side: 95.6% do ✓
Checkmark 5: 18% are university educated ✓
In the ESS there is no data on sexual orientation or whether people attended classics teaching in high school. So I leave it aside and have maximum 5 "ticks".
This is the proportion of the Dutch population that ticks each box for the 5 criteria.
Then I add these to build a variable of how many "checkmarks" people have. The mode is 3 checkmarks. Only 3.3% of the Dutch population tick all the boxes. We can call it the elite.
Now that I have this variable, I can see how it relates to some socio-economic outcomes.
This for instance is the proportion of each "checkmark" category by income decile. You can see that people with 5 checkmarks are concentrated at the top of the income distribution: 65% of them are in the top 20% of household incomes.
Another way to interpret this is this: compared to someone with only one "checkmarks", someone who ticks the five boxes is *ten times* more likely to be in the top 10% of incomes.
People with 5 "checkmarks" also have higher levels of life satisfaction
...and are much more likely to believe that the political system allows people to have influence on politics (well you can say that it does... for people like themselves I guess)
In terms of political preferences people with 5 checkmarks are more likely to vote for Liberal and Green parties (D66, VVD, Groenlinks), but much less for the PVV.
There are too few FvD voters in these waves to include them. The confidence intervals are huge.
It is interesting to look at the relationship between the number of checkmarks and the propensity to vote for D66 and the social democrats. Differences across checkmarks for the PvdA are not significant, but it still looks like a mirror image.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with alexandre afonso

alexandre afonso Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @alexandreafonso

Sep 20, 2022
I am writing a book on immigration policy and the welfare state for @OUPPolitics. Here's a thread on how my own existence is due to immigration policy and the welfare state.
Up to the 1960s, Switzerland had satisfied a great deal of its labour needs with immigrant workers from Italy, so that it had become quite dependent on Italian workers. In 1960, 20% of the whole workforce were migrant workers, and two thirds of these were Italian.
But permit conditions were drastic, with limits on family reunification, exclusion from welfare schemes. Given that wages and living conditions in Italy were improving rapidly, Italy used this dependency as leverage.
Read 17 tweets
May 26, 2022
A thread of things accused of being the cause of massacres of kids in schools: 1. Doors
2. Kids being in schools Image
3. US weapons going to Ukraine instead of American schools. Image
Read 13 tweets
Apr 11, 2022
A couple of scatterplots on social class and yesterday's vote in France.
This is the relationship between the Le Pen % and the % of manual workers in French departments (R2: .45).
And this is the relationship between the Macron vote and the percentage of "cadres" (managers & intellectual professions).
Read 10 tweets
Apr 10, 2022
Based on the projection and earlier polls asking about vote transfers, this is how voter flows in the second round of the French presidential election could look like. If this holds Macron should still win with 54%.
Source projection: ipsos.com/fr-fr/presiden…
Source expected vote transfers: ipsos.com/sites/default/…
This ignores the small candidates for whom I don't have declared preferences in the second round. It also ignores the "endorsements" for the runoff being made just now. Mélenchon just called not to give a single vote to Le Pen, even if he didn't name Macron explicitly.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 28, 2022
How Putinophile are voters of radical-right parties in Western Europe? A thread alexandreafonso.substack.com/p/1-radical-ri…
We know that a number of radical right (RR) parties in Western Europe have developed substantial (ideological; financial) links with the Russian government over the years. bbc.com/news/world-eur…
But what about their voters? The Pew Research Center periodically asks respondents in 16 countries about their views on a number of global issues, and notably their trust in global leaders, including Putin. The last available wave is from 2021. pewresearch.org/global/2021/09…
Read 10 tweets
Mar 27, 2022
I guess it had to happen: I started a substack where I'm going to post some short pieces. You can subscribe here: alexandreafonso.substack.com
The first post is about radical right voters in Western Europe and Vladimir Putin. We know that Le Pen, Salvini and the AfD are very pro-Putin. Was it the case of their voters? alexandreafonso.substack.com/p/1-radical-ri…
I use data from the Pew Global Attitudes Survey collected in 9 countries in 2021 (n=9k). The short answer is that radical right voters were on average 3x more likely than other voters to have confidence in Vladimir Putin to "do the right thing in world affairs".
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(