Here’s a recap of Week 3, last week’s class: A look at the conflict over National History Standards in the 1990s, and an attempt to figure out how to relate the History Wars to the current wave of the anti-“CRT”/ education bills.
The general idea last week was to explore broader contexts in which to situate the current conflict over history education, specifically, and establish a framework for what is happening currently. Three broader contexts stood out. #GEST535
The first context is the general conflict over public education. The conservative critique of public education has a long history – in many ways, it’s been an important part of the modern conservative project since its inception. #GEST535
Both major strands of the modern conservative movement, the libertarian and the traditionalist, have focused on public education since at least the 1950s. The libertarian argument has used the language of efficiency and “choice” to advocate for privatization. #GEST535
Traditionalists have always suspected public education to be a Trojan horse for the forces of liberalism and secularism. Since the 1990s, in particular, conservatives have embraced the idea of “parental rights” as a way of undermining public education. #GEST535
Conservatives seem to have basically developed two somewhat contradictory ideas of how to handle the “problem” of public education: Either you get rid of it by way of privatization, or you install a regime of all-encompassing surveillance in the classroom. #GEST535
These ideas are contradictory because one insists on the state being taken out of education, the other wants it to be omnipresent. However, the forces behind these ideas are united in the political project of countering the supposed liberal dominance of public education. #GEST535
On this general conservative critique of public education, the latest episode of the @KnowYrEnemyPod is excellent and immensely clarifying. #GEST535
The second context for the current History Wars is the broader conflict over race and racism in education. We talked about the current anti-“CRT” crusade and why the fight against a decades-old legal theory has suddenly become the rallying cry on the Right. #GEST535
We also discussed how “CRT” relates to history / the historical profession. If conservatives are actually objecting to the acknowledgment that racism has shaped the systems and structures of American life, then yes, basically all recent historical scholarship is suspect. #GEST535
The third context is the longer-term conflict over history and what stories of the past to tell inside and outside the classroom more specifically. This goes back much further than the 90s – but there was a direct precursor in the form of the 90s History Wars. #GEST535
In those 90s History Wars, specifically the fight over National History Standards, the conservative criticism basically boiled down to the idea that “liberal” history was unpatriotic, subversive, and deliberately destroying the foundations of national unity. #GEST535
As Newt Gingrich put it in “To renew America” in 1995: Liberal history education was undermining that “clear sense of what it meant to be an American,” which had supposedly allowed the nation to flourish from 1607 to 1965 (note the dates!). #GEST535
In Gingrich’s understanding, from 1607 to 1965 (again, note the dates, and when things supposedly went off the rails) “America had one continuous civilization built around a set of commonly accepted legal and cultural principles.” #GEST535
Those who were targeted by that critique explicitly refuted the idea that they were trying to undermine unity. As social historian Gary Nash, chiefly responsible for the National Standards, put it: The mission was to “promote greater unity among Americans.” #GEST535
This, Gary Nash believed, should be done by establishing a more inclusive view of American history that elevated the perspectives of people and groups besides white male heroes. Here’s Nash again: #GEST535
“The KKK and McCarthyism are somber episodes in American history. But will not students be taught valuable lessons and indeed be uplifted by learning how most Americans put the KKK and McCarthyism behind them? This is not dismal history but dismal history overcome.” #GEST535
“Dismal history overcome” – that’s a perspective that is maybe not the same, but seems eminently consistent or at least compatible with liberal ideas of progress from the 90s through the Obama era. #GEST535
Conservatives tried to frame the 90s History Wars as a conflict between a patriotic version of history that could provide the basis for national unity – and a subversive history that destroyed the national foundation. #GEST535
However, it seems more adequate to understand the 90s History Wars as a conflict over national unity – but on whose terms? A white nationalist unity history vs a multiracial, pluralistic re-telling intended to create a new model of national unity. #GEST535
In that way, both sides actually shared the idea that the teaching of history had an important role to play in the creation of national unity – that history was supposed to contribute to the national project. #GEST535
From now through the end of the semester, recaps of what we’re reading and discussing will come shortly after the meetings, usually sometime in the middle of the week. That way, it should be possible to follow along with the course basically in real time. #GEST535
Next up, probably tomorrow or Thursday: A recap of today’s Week 4 discussions of the 1619 Project. We tried the near-impossible – drown out the noise surrounding it, ignore (for now) the reactions, and discuss the history and politics of the 1619 Project itself. #GEST535
As always, here’s the original #GEST535 thread that contains all the general information on the course, the ideas and questions behind it, and links to all the different spin-off threads I’ll be posting throughout the semester:
A clarifying piece by @perrybaconjr: What kind of democracy, and for whom?
Conservatives want to restrict democracy in order to uphold white Christian patriarchal rule. They are turning to authoritarianism because they are failing. Thoughts from a historical perspective: 1/
There are two key questions that have defined recent U.S. history: How have ideas and realities of democracy changed, specifically since the 1950s? And how has political conservatism reacted to those shifting versions and visions of democracy? 2/
It is often said that the U.S. is the world’s oldest democracy. While that is not necessarily incorrect, depending on the definition of “democracy,” it obscures rather than illuminates the reality of American life, past and present, and the nature of the current conflict. 3/
I wish more people knew about this story: a bust one of the KKK’s founders (!), in the year 2000 (!), in Selma, Alabama (!), in direct reaction to the election of a Black mayor. Grapple with this in earnest and you’ll understand so much about America’s past and present.
Nathan Bedford Forrest is famous not in spite, but solely because he was a traitor, war criminal, and the first Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. He was the embodiment of white supremacist violence when he was alive, and has been a symbol of continued white supremacy ever since.
What would you say about a German town with a large Jewish community, that just elected a Jewish mayor, erecting a statue of a Wehrmacht general who was infamous for being an anti-Semite, massacring Soviet soldiers, and founding a neo-Nazi terror organization after the war?
In Week 2, we started with a look at some big-picture takes on the History Wars and a broader reflection on the question: Why is everybody talking about history? The goal was to raise questions rather than to find final answers – an attempt to refine our agenda. #GEST535
The discussion focused on two pieces by historians Timothy Snyder and Matthew Karp that try to offer a broader diagnosis of what the History Wars tell us about American politics, society, and culture right at this current moment. #GEST535
Perfect example of the slippery slope argument conservatives like to deploy to delegitimize cultural change they reject.
The actual issue: The gratuitous use of the N word in fiction faces more criticism today than it used to – is that bad?
Nichols: The road to the Gulag!
If we actually were “killing culture” and descending towards “a Sovietized, carefully censored culture,” I’d agree that’d be bad. But where is the evidence for that? The fact that Quentin Tarantino might get criticized if he used the N word as much today as he did in the 90s?
But, of course, once you start censoring (no one is censoring) the genius of great artists (white men, that is), once you silence them (no one is silencing), that’s clearly an indication that society as a whole is on a path to totalitarianism.
This is a crucial observation: In the American political discourse, “working class” is often just shorthand for “white people with certain reactionary cultural sensibilities” - as in: “The working class rebelled against the establishment and voted for Trump.”
It’s really striking how the terms “blue collar” and “working class” almost always refer to either a type of professional occupation or certain reactionary cultural sensibilities of white people and are often entirely detached from matters of class / socio-economic status.
This is well in line with the pervasive assumption of a white “normal” that still governs the American political and cultural discourse. Concepts like “working class,” or “parents,” or “Christians” often come with a silent “white.”
Here’s the reading list for this course I am currently teaching. It’s somewhat preliminary: It’s a new course and changes may occur, depending on where our discussions take us. I’ll also certainly add more primary sources. Follow along at #GEST535
We started with a look at some big-picture takes on the History Wars and a broader reflection on an important question: Why is everybody talking about history? #GEST535
This week, we looked at some previous iterations of the History Wars, specifically at the conflict over National History Standards in the 90s, and tried to situate the current anti-“CRT”/ education bills in that longer-term context. #GEST535