Truly wild how many lies and inaccuracies Andy Ngo can cram into three little paragraphs.
Let's count them (thread):
1) I'm not a member of Philadelphia Antifa.
I'm an antifascist, and they're lovely people in my experience.
But yeah, no, the fact that some Sputh Philly racist once told a radio host I was part of some secret Barack Obama Antifa plot is, um. Not actually fact, lol.
2) I'm not a fat rights activist.
Never have been, have never called myself that.
It's good, liberatory work, but it isn't work I do.
This is just Andy calling me fat and then presenting it as journalism.
Again, lying.
3) This is a major one: I've never said honking at the convoy was a Hitler reference.
Trucks have horns, honking happens, lol.
What I *did* say was that the #honkhonk hashtag predates the convoy and has long been used online to signal Nazi sympathies, since 2018 at least.
That's not something I just thought up now, and I'm not the only one who has documented it (thoroughly) over the years.
Anyone who looks at far right spaces knows the Honkler/#honkhonk meme.
It doesn't originate with the convoy. That's just a fact.
4) Not a lie or very important, just further proof of laziness: he couldn't even bother to get the name of my college right, e en after his own followers pointed out his error. It's Swarthmore, not Swathmore.
5) "Self-proclaimed expert" I guess this is very technically true, in that if you asked me directly, I would call myself an expert.
But my work has been published in Bitch and the Information, and my research has been cited everywhere from The Guardian to The Washington Post.
In other words, a whole lot of people, including journalists at respectable national and international outlets, have declared me an expert.
It's not just me going around wearing a "Very Important Nazi Expert" tin foil hat and yelling to clouds about how I know things.
6) I never bothered to tell people to report Andy.
That's a lie.
Twitter lets Andy get away with pretty much anything on here.
I *did* tell someone who asked that I wouldn't mind them reporting this sort of content from Andy's followers my mentions, but that was it.
7) Finally-- and this isn't a lie, just funny-- it's true that I sometimes ask folks to consider donating to my Patreon if they like my work, since I put a lot of it on here for free.
I make a little over $408 from it a month, not exactly a fortune.
ANYWAY!
Does anyone happen to remember how Andy got famous?
Dude got splashed with a milkshake and said it caused him literal brain damage, lmfao.
He raised $194 THOUSAND dollars off that, even though his "concrete milkshake" bs was later shown to be a lie, too.
In other words, Andy Ngo using the platform he uses to run his grift to call me a grifter is... pretty effin' rich, lol.
In summary: Andy isn't a journalist, never has been.
He's a propagandic liar who grifts off the hope that his followers are naive enough to take his made-up nonsense at face value (and/or use it as an excuse to troll his targets).
If you believe his stories, you aren't a freethinker. You're not even on his team.
You're just one of his marks.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I am *very* tired of seeing 1/6 type stuff play out and then watching folks try and imagine like Russia or some secret far right institute masterminded the whole thing in a complex plot.
It ignores the chaos and lets the US participants and organizers off the hook.
What usually happens is that propagandists throw shit (like these Facebook groups) at the wall & see what sticks.
Then, astroturfers build on that theme and organize their contacts on the ground to pretend to be the new fresh-faced grassroots supposedly galvanized by the issue.
Yeah, I don't know Canada well enough to say for sure, but my sense is that there was a lot of astroturfing there.
For the US, propaganda networks encouraged the idea of a US convoy, grassroots networks are now forming around it, and astroturfers will ultimately resource them.
Usually for this stuff, the order is different-- propagandists float outrage bait to see what most inflames the base, then astroturfers spend the bulk of their resources trying to prop up anemic organizing by the usual suspects, who turn out the usual people.
I'm not trying to downplay the role of propaganda networks and astroturfing institutions here, but what's crucially different is that there's already a grassroots, organic response to the propaganda pushing a US copycat convoy.
Folks, I was an organizer otg first day for both Occupy Philly and Abolish ICE, and a lot of smaller left emergent movements.
The signs I look for that tell me an emergent movement has legs?
They're all there for this US copycat of the far right Canadian trucker convoy.
I really want to emphasize that I'm saying this not only as someone with expertise and a lot of experience monitoring and organizing against the far right, but as someone who has a pretty good track record of spotting, organizing within, and analyzing emergent movement.
When I'm assessing this sort of thing, I'm looking at whether there's a certain amount of social media buzz (there's lots), but also whether there's the potential for resourcing (there's plenty, look at the Canada convoy GoFundMe precedent) & institutional support (it's there).
Again, I think it's too early to assess if or how well this will come together, emergent movement fizzles more frequently than it pops.
That said, a lot of the pieces are there.
On the ground meetings are happening, a grassroots network is emerging, there's a celeb component
We know from the Canadian one that money (lots of it) is likely available, which will heavily attract even more of the kinds of niche celebrities grifters that helped popularize 1/6/22.
And of course, it will also present at least the perception of resourced gathering otg.