1/4 Macron’s plan to install 100 GW of solar power, 28 GW of new nuclear and 40 GW of wind, while simultaneously extending the lifespan of existing reactors should not be intended just as a plan to decarbonize France, whose electricity is aleeady amongst the greenest in EU.
2/4 If their reactors operated at full power they could pretty much decarbonize just by electrifying everything they can, without the need of installing more power. However, this nuclear&renewables push can be easily explained if we look at Germany, Italy and Belgium’s policies.
3/4 All these countries are phasing out nuclear and will be reliant on gas or import for baseload. Most of them already planned to increase electricity import. Macron’s plan aims at decarbonizing the whole Europe, by strengthening France’s role as electricity exporter.
4/4 Of course, France is not a charity, and they plan on having other countries repaying their investments. The bet is that the price of electricity will only but rise as we shift away from fossil fuels.
Time will show they’re betting right.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why the current draft of EU Taxonomy IS a victory for nuclear.
Thread 1/
I’ve seen both nuclear advocates and anti-nukes depict the EU Taxonomy as a loss or at least not a complete win. I beg to differ and I’m going to explain why.
2/
First: the “until 2045” clause. Of course the taxonomy goes under the outdated assumption that REs are intrinsically better than anything else so other solutions must be temporary. However, let me stress this out, the Taxonomy WILL UNDERGO YEARLY UPDATES. 3/
Today newspapers are celebrating Greenpeace’s 50th birthday, saying they changed history.
I suppose they were referring to the Nazca lines they ruined, effectively removing a piece of history.
But let’s fair: they have a history of successes, so I’m going to list a few. 1/
In 1995 they lied about the BRENT Spar Oil platform, claiming it was full of oil and forcing Shell to dismantle it on earth (a polluting process) rather than on sea (less polluting). When the platform was dismantled, the oil wasn’t there.
It was just a prank, bro.
2/
In 2013 they declared air traffic growth a major problem in fighting global warming. Soon after it was discovered their director was commuting by airplane to go to office.
3/