@daithaigilbert Based on the unforgivingly mocking tone and the word choices that pop up in every article about Reidt during the year between Rowan's date and his own fireball prediction, I really think the NYT had a single reporter making it their mission to follow everything Reidt did.
The New York Fucking Times ran a story in January 1926 where they dubbed Reidt's car the Chariot of Doom
It'd be great if the New York Times returned to the once-noble tradition of treating these things as ridiculous hoaxes worthy only of mockery and scorn
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I finally saw the clip they're all freaking out about, and my immediate reaction (probably from spending too much time in goth clubs in my youth) was "that's a tear in his hose."
Turns out it was a tear in his hose.
They could have checked literally any other clip he was in, but then @againstgrmrs wouldn't get to lie about it
i'm out there winning hearts and minds, one pearl-clutching MAGA at a time
I'm watching the Ye/Fuentes/Jones interview now and lemmie tell ya, I hope Ben Shapiro is coming to grips with exactly what about 40% of the Republican Party secretly believes
They're nice to your face as long as you're propagandizing for them, Ben, but they'll line you up with the rest of us the second you're not useful
good fucking lord Ye is reading "jokes written by Owen Benjamin about Ben Shapiro" while Alex Jones anxiously laughs and Nick Fuentes genuinely laughs
The author went out and spoke with them face to face, and so these conspiracy theorists seem nice, and normal.
But going unexplored here is sitting down with them at their computers and seeing what these people are like online, where they gleefully talk about executions.
The article acknowledges that this is where the movement actually exists and gets all of it information, but what exactly are they learning? It's kept pretty vague.
(for instance, 'event 201' is the belief that the United Nations planned and executed the COVID 19 pandemic)