Love means something much more than what most people think (material obsession, therapy of disorder).

I was always hesitant myself about how feminine Buddhists (especially Western Buddhists) could be. And while I already knew to suppose they mean something very expansive,
I still couldn't understand until I got older and had even more experiences and self-reflection. Talking with religious people of equal intellect and seriousness and sincerity has helped magnify the same in me.
There is no void of strength and power in love; there's no cowardice, there's no pacifism, there's not even a pause before war, where you kill whom you ultimately love. It's weird but not false.
We can hope that it doesn't be that way, but we can feel relief that we at least don't hate, and for not hating we still unite our true souls together.

This life wasn't for us to decide how it ends but we can decide whether we hate.
Hate is the great self-defeater, and I've been guilty of that at least as much as anyone. Your greatest self does not want that. There are so many worlds possible when you can see beyond it. That is exactly the Glory and gift of the Divine.
I will probably always be rough around the edges and not a choir boy, but I am on the side of the religious and of transcendence.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with only trust those that build

only trust those that build Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Imperius__13

Feb 16
One example of many of how hot button issues should not be ideological, 'obliterating history' (resdivinaestpublica.wordpress.com/2018/09/10/eri…):

newsmax.com/newsfront/girl… Image
I do support 'gun control' and have for a number of years now, in the same way the medieval kingdoms controlled weaponry: it belongs to the responsible, not to everyone.
That means people with a heritage that understands the responsibility (Hajnal peoples) and individuals that can prove themselves an exception, no one else!

That is how we finally end the gun control hot button issue without it leading to all the other bad we do not want.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 16
Caught the new Keith Woods video:



I can write you guys a long essay on theory of history or just give the basic points of my response. I'm guessing most people prefer the latter:
(1) There is not a structural-conceptual dichotomy possible that saves nationalism as an originating worldview in need of no greater help.

(But beyond that, I do take Keith as a tactically serious person and support him wanting traditionalists to have fuller-bodied praxis.)
(2) Adam and I have already been working on this maturer reconciliation with Modernity, which respects all levels of language and institutions, identity and autonomy.
Read 13 tweets
Feb 14
Imagine thinking China could take over the world before already producing critical resentment against it:

newsmax.com/newsfront/wint…

The world will head in a better direction, but it will inevitably involve war and death, as it always does.
Tucker was 100% right that the Ukraine issue effectively distracts from China, if it wasn't intentionally done to do exactly that.
Now we have to ask ourselves why Putin is comfortable being Xi's human shield—and how easy could it be to turn Putin against Xi by giving Putin what he wants?
Read 5 tweets
Feb 14
The only serious anthropology and the only serious leadership are both religious.
I'm 'unaffiliated' and will likely continue into syncretism, but I have great respect for Orthodox Christianity (don't read too much into my silly trolling of what is probably more feminine Episcopalians) and Islam.
Contemporary philosophy can (and does) have technical innovation ('linguistic elaboration')—here's one nested example: anthropoetics.ucla.edu/ap2701/2701kat…—but in the end everything new must reconcile with origins
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(