That someone could understand media report through the lends of law enforcement - even get that there are clear disparities in enforcement - and then conclude that prosecutors don't prosecute nearly enough people, is mind-boggling.
Honestly, while I appreciate the recognition of the symbiosis between law enforcement and media, there is so much that is problematic with this thread.
Crime is a technical legal term. It's not only inappropriate to use casually, it's inaccurate.
If you want to point out that someone should have been charged with a crime, for instance within the Trump administration, you report on that and quote criminal lawyers pointing out that the conduct fits the definition of a crime and past cases where people have been prosecuted.
And no one should ever be called a criminal. Label conduct as criminal, say a person has been charged or convicted of a crime. I guess dude hasn't read up on person-first language. Doesn't matter if we are discussing Trump and his cronies.
.@adamdavidson if you'd qualified this thread by limiting it to white collar criminal cases and Trump, it could have made powerful points; but instead it's not only inaccurate but dismissive of poor Black and Brown people in the US who are targeted and overcharged by prosecutors.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Of course almost 2,000 of them call in sick or are AWOL every day, so that reduces their numbers, but that still leaves a ratio of 1 corrections officer per incarcerated person, four times the national average. thecity.nyc/2021/7/11/2257…
Rikers guards have left housing units with almost no staff, have left their posts and watched as people have died by suicide to justify their campaign to get the city to employ more guards. nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-c…
It's an unpopular opinion, but I believe the judge presiding over the federal trial of the three men who killed Ahmaud Arbery should have honored the government's and McMichaels plea deal.
Not because I think proving that the defendants were motivated by racism isn't important.
In fact I think it's vital. The state trial whitewashed that those men lynched Ahmaud Arbery. Maybe that was necessary to gain a conviction. States' failure to secure convictions in these cases are one of the reasons federal civil rights cases are brought. vox.com/22801394/racis…
My feelings are rooted in a few things.
1. Knowing that the men would have had to admit that they killed Ahmaud because of racism if they pleaded guilty. That's powerful. If they are convicted at trial they won't because they will appeal.
The client had a drug addiction. He shoplifted to get drugs. He was in horrible physical pain because he was dying, but the ADA was completely unsympathetic.
I remember the judge saying there was "nothing he could do" in these circumstances, even tho he had complete discretion.
Our client was only in jail in the first place because he had shoplifted and the ADA had charged that case as a felony burglary. He had a substantial record for drug and petty theft cases. He couldn't afford bail.
Today in NY that case would not be eligible for bail.
Pulling people over for tinted windows is a form of "broken windows" policing that targets Black drivers - see observations by @GangiFromProp and @MarshallProj .
Moreover, like most traffic stops (and indeed police pursuits for serious crimes) there are far better alternatives - police here had Mr. Aristhee's plates.
in other cases that are not traffic stops there are usually cameras that allow police to follow up.