Many of followers are not UK academics, so here's a quick 🧵 on why higher education staff across the UK are on strike this week (and beyond). There are two big issues at play here: (1) pensions, and (2) the four fights. #UCUstrike#OneOfUsAllOfUs /1
Pensions: there have been some major proposed cuts to our pensions. These are largely based on a valuation of the pension fund carried out in March 2020, the beginning of the pandemic, when markets were volatile. #UCUstrike#OneOfUsAllOfUs /2
In brief, claims that the pension fund is in a terrible deficit have been shown to be false. The pension managers have been either incompetent or untruthful about this and related issues. #UCUstrike#OneOfUsAllOfUs /3
UK academic salaries are relatively low (more on that soon), and often our pension scheme is used as a recruitment tactic to "make up" for the low salary. Not if you cut the pension! #UCUstrike#OneOfUsAllOfUs /4
Next, the Four Fights. This is about fair treatment of staff, and (as the name suggests) has four components. It covers pay, equality, workloads, and casualisation. I'll explain each in turn, although they're fairly self-explanatory. #UCUstrike#OneOfUsAllOfUs /6
Pay: In real terms, UK higher education salaries are falling. Between 2009 and 2019, relative to inflation, salaries have fallen by more than 17%. #UCUstrike#OneOfUsAllOfUs /7
Equality: The pay issues are even worse for women and people from minority backgrounds. We need to close the pay gap. #UCUstrike#OneOfUsAllOfUs /8
Workloads: A survey at Newcastle University found that 78% of staff find that their workload is unmanageable at least half of the time. 85% reported working more than their contracted hours. ncl.web.ucu.org.uk/files/2021/09/…#UCUstrike#OneOfUsAllOfUs /9
Casualisation: Precarious employment is on the rise. We're striking for more job security and open-ended contracts. Postgraduate teaching assistants should be treated like employees and afforded the corresponding benefits. #UCUstrike#OneOfUsAllOfUs /10
Going on strike is a last resort. I don't think I know anyone here who doesn't have a genuine passion for teaching and research. A better world is possible. #UCUstrike#OneOfUsAllOfUs /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some of my own observations (I'm not a semanticist so these are a lot less insightful than Lelia's comments):
The prevalence of coronavirus in our lives also means that the word "symptoms" alone often means "Covid symptoms".
"Mask" is also pretty vague and can range from a N95/FFP2 mask to a simple cloth covering. The term "face covering" is often used in the UK to disambiguate from medical masks.
I haven't posted about my research in a while (because pandemic, whee), but I'm pleased to share "Graph-theoretic Properties of the Class of Phonological Neighbourhood Networks", to be presented at CMCL: aclweb.org/anthology/2021…
The paper outlines the beginning of a research agenda in the formal properties of phonological neighbourhood networks, which is a representational tool for looking at how lexical structure is organized.
Studies involving phonological neighbourhood networks are on the rise, yet we (as a field) don't know very much about the intrinsic properties of these networks. This could lead to problems, especially if we just blindly apply standard network-theoretic methods.
All else being equal, we generally expect words to be similar between related languages. However, there are always times when words shift in meaning, perhaps becoming more or less specialised than they used to be. /2
An example is the word for "dog" in German _Hund_, Dutch _hond_, Danish _hund_, and other Germanic languages. The English cognate of this word is _hound_, which has a more specialised meaning: specifically, a hound is a dog used for work or hunting, not a pet. /3
German and English words are usually pretty similar. Maus~mouse, Milch~milk, Wasser~water, sechs~six, Vater~father. But the German word for horse, "Pferd", is nothing like English. What happened? A thread. /1
English and German both share a common ancestor, which linguists refer to as "Proto-Germanic", spoken around 2,000 years ago in the north German plain and modern-day Denmark. Other Germanic languages include Norwegian, Dutch, Gothic, Faroese, and Afrikaans. /2
This proto-language presumably had only a single word for horse. Was it the ancestor of modern "horse" or the ancestor of "Pferd"? Which word is original and which one is an interloper? /3
Fun fact: The word "bear" is originally "the brown one" because there was a taboo against saying the bear's true name. Time for a thread about animal name taboos! /1
The Proto-Indo-European word for bear was *h₂ŕ̥tḱos, literally "the destroyer". This is reflected in modern French "ours", Greek "arktos", Sanskrit "ṛ́kṣa", Persian "خرس", and others. The name "Arthur" comes from the Welsh form. /2
Germanic tribes re-dubbed the bear "the brown one" to avoid saying its name. Russians called it "honey eater", and Lithuanians "the licker", possibly in reference to the folk theory that bears are born formless and their mothers lick them into shape. /3
Has anyone else noticed how a great many problems in academia and academic publishing today are due to the use of publications as a measure of research productivity? A thread:
Using journal "prestige" (or IF) to assess research quality, rather than the attributes of the research itself, increases their value of established journals and publishers. This leads to those journals playing a gatekeeping role rather than a true peer-review role.
In order to retain their high prestige, the gatekeeping journals must prioritize the publication of exciting novel results. This disincentivizes the publication of replications, null results, and work that isn't deemed "ground-breaking".