Putin’s authoritarianism has been accepted in the neoliberal global order because it doesn’t care about democracy or rights as long as labor is kept cheap and resources flowing.
But the fabled “peace” and “stability” of it is infinitely fragile. We’re watching it self-destruct.
Neoliberalism’s acceptance and even approval of illiberal authoritarianism, part of its original thrust, is going to be its undoing as there was always going to come a time where market forces demanded invasions and interruptions of the status quo.
Deep down, American neoliberals truly believed they were going to be able to dam up capitalism, control it and direct it forever, all while allowing and even encouraging illiberalism to grow. It was an absurd, self-destructive idea, and it was never going to last.
The same illiberalism that was intended to suppress human rights and freedoms in service of the market also inherently breeds militarism and authoritarianism and the urge to invade and conquer. It was always going to come to this as long as that was necessary.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Mitch McConnell breaking ranks to criticize January 6th and the censuring of Cheney and Kinzinger is a major story, but not because McConnell is principled.
There's a war in the GOP and an authoritarian, illiberal movement is taking control.
Mitch McConnell represents a past generation of Republicans ensconced in neoliberalism.
What we are watching are the consequences of the GOP partnering with authoritarian powers to further their power and profit and a terrifying changing of the guards.
2/
McConnell was correct that January 6th was a violent insurrection, but we also have to recognize that his actions and the actions of the GOP explicitly laid the foundations for this to happen.
Pretending this was a spontaneous phenomenon is simply delusional.
Our democracy is under relentless attack and we are in a full-blown crisis.
But as attention continues to focus on Donald Trump, what gets lost is that extremely powerful and wealthy individuals are funding and orchestrating the entire thing.
Notice that a lot of political discourse now is appealing to corporations to handle societal problems rather than government.
That’s by design. Neoliberalism dismantled government as a representation of public will, transferring power from mass politics to how we spend our money
When realizing neoliberalism turned government strictly into protectors of wealth and corporations into the arbiters of political will, it becomes more and more obvious why some companies pretend to be progressive.
It’s marketing. That’s all it is.
Right now, as Spotify loses value because it platforms Joe Rohan, Apple is gaining because it projects progressive values.
But Apple benefits from forced labor and gross exploitation around the world.
It’s only public relations. An appeal to political beliefs.
The Republican Party is split on the crisis in Ukraine because an authoritarian, pro-Putin, antidemocratic movement has been carefully created and is gaining momentum.
Coverage continues to ignore this very obvious, very dangerous fact.
What we call MAGA is actually a manifestation of a larger, more complicated push to create an illiberal foundation in America.
Some very wealthy and very powerful people are attempting to destroy liberal democracy and seize power. This crisis in Ukraine is making it much clearer
Media coverage is largely focusing on Tucker Carlson’s pro-Putin broadcasts and completely missing the link with his pro-Orbán, pro-illiberal appeals and how it ties into the larger rise of “National Conservatism” and the dismantling of liberal democracy.
What Rep Malinowski brought to people's attention yesterday isn't anything new. There has been an aggressive and intentional radicalization in America focused on making the GOP base more and more supportive of Putin and authoritarianism.
2/
For years now, shockingly, the GOP has held a higher opinion of Putin than Democratic presidents.
This wasn't an accident, but the consequence of years' worth of manipulation, fearmongering, and a push of authoritarian, anti-democracy ideals for a purpose.
Companies like Mars that profit off things like child labor use rebrands like this M&M stuff to try and capture specific markets.
Companies like Fox News use it to frighten its viewers for profit.
It’s two corporations in a professional wrestling match. Mutually beneficial.
It’s a song and dance between corporations promising they’re tolerant or progressive enslaving people around the world and Right Wing corporate news.
It creates an unreal sense for people that things are changing, leading to profits and further radicalization.
A sense among viewers of Fox that things are changing derives from cultural depictions by corporations who use progressive ideas as a market tool but don’t care at all about progress. It cycles back and forth as demagogues use the feeling for authoritarian purposes.