Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Feb 15, 2022 13 tweets 5 min read Read on X
THREAD BREAKING: Sussmann's attorney's aren't happy with Durham. Filed today.
2/ Just posting pages here and then will comment:
3/ continued:
4/ Now this is interesting. So if none of the data was after Trump was president, why was it provided to show Trump was using a Russian phone? Because Trump was at the Executive Office? This footnote makes no sense.
5/ Oh, poor Sussmann. You spread lies about Trump for 5 years and now Trump exposes you...🎻🎻
6/ I don't think this tack, however, is the wisest...."Oh, we didn't charge you with conspiracy, did we..."
7/ OMgosh...so the campaign is claiming Sussmann did not go to FBI on behalf of Hillary Clinton campaign. Now, this is getting good.
8/ It wouldn't surprise me if the court is inclined to grant the motion and caution Durham not to file additional detail. Although the Durham will have a chance to respond to the Motion to Strike, which should be interesting.
9/9 The biggest take-away, however is this: The press has starting covering this in a way it hasn't before and that is huge! Sussmann's chronies had no issue leaking to the NYT in September re the EOP, but now that they can't control the narrative, Shut. It. Down.
Post-Twit: I must admit I'm bummed they didn't single out my two articles in their motion, but then again, they were so solid & devasting they likely didn't want to bring any more attention to them.
Post-Twit 2: Also, from strategy angle, this wasn't wise b/c now the press is going to cover it MORE. Had Sussmann stayed silent, it would have likely died down in a day. UNLESS he succeeds in getting court to tell Durham to cut it out.
Post-Twit 3: Okay I should have just waited until I knew I was done. From the indictment. So here's Sussmann's defense. Sussmann's attorne to Clinton Campaign Person: Did you tell Sussmann to go to FBI w/ this info.
Answer: No. Closing: "He may have defrauded the campaign
PT4: but he didn't lie to Baker.
Durham's Cross: Did you authorize Sussmann to go to the press with this story? Did you authorize Sussman to do X, Y, Z. This defense is going to open up a huge can of worms for Clinton Campaign!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

Oct 28
Why were they investigating in the October 2020??? Image
2/ So Trump campaign was being investigated in 2020 as well. Image
3/ SERIOUSLY! Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 28
LOL. The judge on the SNAP case...Please, please, please, Trump Administration seek to implead Senate Democrats!! Image
/2 Here's docket to track. courtlistener.com/docket/7178339…
3/ Ummm, no, that's not how our constitution works! Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 23
OMfrickin' gosh: You HAVE to be kidding me! They opened an investigation based on the alternative electors that election lawyers concluded was the appropriate course based on the precise same situation involving Kennedy and Hawaii!!! 1/ Image
2/ Here is a summary of the need for alternative electors and how to pretend this was a potential crime of fraud is NUTSO: thefederalist.com/2023/05/15/the…
3/ The memo itself makes clear it wasn't fraud! This investigation was for 3 purposes only: To destroy Trump; to destroy anyone connected with Trump; and to dissuade anyone in the future from connecting with Trump or any non-establishment politician. Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 16
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: 7th Cir. denies Trump stay pending appeal. 1/ Image
3/ Here's full panel.
It was 3-0 for the decision. And I was correct when I had earlier said I thought the motions panel had Rovner and St. Eve. Hamilton is as hard left as you can get. Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 9
🚨9th Cir. argument starting. 1/
3/ Judge asks what document is President invoking statute?
DOJ: Says don't need any document, but says many documents that show all the reasons for activation in Portland.
Read 21 tweets
Oct 6
Holy CRAP! @ChuckGrassley has the best whistleblowers. 1/ Image
2/ NOTE: These were buried in "prohibited access" files that I reported on before. judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/rele…
3/ Here's where I catalogued the questions that need answers. thefederalist.com/2025/06/04/the…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(