As special prosecutor, Durham has identified enough potential grand jury targets to become something of a full employment service for the defense bar. Defense lawyers, having belatedly reached the conclusion that his investigation is for real, are now scrambling to figure him out
Will he be able to run out all his leads or will Department of Justice higher-ups cap the investigation at what they decide is a politically manageable point? Can Durham protect his task force from the brutal rivalries among the city's police agencies?
And what kind of lawyer is it anyway who sneaks out a side door when he could be lecturing the TV crews out front about the moral superiority of his position?
"I was surprised at first that he got the appointment because he is not political," said John R. Williams, a defense attorney in New Haven. "And then, frankly, my one thought when he went up there was: Jesus Christ, are they going to eat him for breakfast?"
2.5 years ago, then-U.S. Attorney General Janet C. Reno appointed Durham to explore allegations that, for three decades, FBI agents and police officers in Boston have been in bed with the mob.
In particular, he is looking for crimes committed by agents working with James "Whitey" Bulger and Stephen "The Rifleman" Flemmi, two murderous gangsters who served as FBI informants for a combined 50 years.
What Durham has found to date is nothing less than sensational, judging from what has become part of the public record.
Among other things, he has accused a decorated FBI agent of setting up at least three murders.
He is examining evidence suggesting that a second agent might have participated in another - the execution of a former owner of World Jai Alai Inc., once one of the country's leading parimutuel businesses.
What's more, he has charged state and local police officers in Massachusetts with secretly helping Bulger and Flemmi. A half dozen bodies have been unearthed from secret graves scattered around Boston.
Last month, Durham gave defense lawyers secret government memos suggesting that unscrupulous FBI officials, probably with the knowledge of ex-Director J. Edgar Hoover, framed four men for a 1965 murder.
State prosecutors, after 30 years of intransigence, immediately began steps to drop charges against the four - two of whom died of old age in prison.
"You underestimate Durham at your own peril," said Hugh Keefe, a New Haven defense lawyer.
Successful prosecutors often leave embittered defense lawyers and alienated witnesses in their wakes, victims of a win-at all-costs mentality.
Durham, by all accounts, is a refreshing departure. A colleague, struggling for the right description, recently caught himself short and confessed: "I don't want to get maudlin here. But he really is a good person." Even defense lawyers have little criticism.
"There is nothing negative that I can say," Boston lawyer Anthony Cardinale said. "So if you're looking for that, I'm not in that mode."
Cardinale would seem like a shoo-in for the negative, having been one of 6 lawyers who squared off against Durham in Hartford in the early 1990s in what then was the biggest mob trial in the country.
His client, Louis "Louie Pugs" Pugliano, got life without parole. So frustrated was Cardinale, who has defended clients in some of the country's more notable organized crime trials, that he nearly got himself jailed for contempt.
"He's obviously a very fierce competitor," Cardinale said. "But he's not a zealot. And he does it by the rules. He is very professional. He is courteous. I've been up against them all over the country and I'd put him in the top echelon of federal prosecutors.
He's such a decent guy you can't hate him. That can make it hard to get motivated."
The view from within law enforcement is even less complicated.
"There is no more principled, there is no more better living, there is no finer person that I know of or have encountered in my life," said Richard Farley, a former assistant special agent in charge of the FBI's New Haven division.
In 1989, someone shot William "The Wild Guy" Grasso and dumped his body in a thicket of poison ivy by the Connecticut River. That provoked court-authorized, electronic bugging because, at the time of his death, Grasso was under-boss of New England's Patriarca crime family.
Gangsters have learned to turn up the radio while they whisper, so poor recordings became stacks of lousy transcripts riddled by the parenthetical word "unintelligible." Normally, senior prosecutors do not concern themselves with transcribing FBI audiotapes. Durham does.
"John is a perfectionist," said Superior Court Judge Robert Devlin, a former prosecutor who worked the Grasso case with Durham.
"Sometimes he'll look over a transcript and he won't be satisfied," Devlin said. "Of course, the agents say he can hear grass grow.
He has remarkable hearing. It's like Ted Williams seeing the seam on the ball turn."
By deciphering a phrase written off as unintelligible, Durham turned up a piece of evidence supporting the critical prosecutorial contention mobsters in CT & RI were working together
With mobsters around New England linked, Durham could build a regional racketeering case against those eventually arrested for Grasso's murder. He ultimately convicted mobsters elsewhere of crimes committed by associates in Connecticut.
Durham remarked that his four sons can attend college wherever they choose so long as the school has a "Cross" in its name - once fired off an angry note to a Connecticut bishop after a priest appeared in court as a character witness for a Ku Klux Klansman.
He likes to hunt ducks, work trout with a fly rod and still looks fit. He has thinning hair, steel-framed glasses and probably a closet full of gray suits. He has a tart sense of humor and, despite a daunting professional schedule, is a fixture at wakes and retirements.
He takes Lent seriously and rarely misses Mass on Sunday.
Little is known of his private life. Asked if he would cooperate with a journalist writing about him, he volunteered to make available "all the info to which members of the fourth estate are entitled under FOIA laws."
Pressed, he said: "You know, I'm not the only person working on this case. Why don't you write about the others. They deserve credit."
Friends say he studied at Colgate University and was a fashionably long-haired member of the school baseball team. After receiving a law degree at the University of Connecticut, he volunteered as a social worker on a South Dakota Indian reservation.
Back in Connecticut, he found work as a prosecutor in the newly created chief state's attorney's office. Before long, he was recruited by then-New Haven State's Attorney Arnold Markle, who had a grant to organize a groundbreaking unit dedicated to prosecuting career criminals.
Durham moved on to the U.S. Department of Justice's super secret organized crime Strike Force. When the strike forces were folded into local U.S. attorney's offices, Durham became chief of the criminal division in New Haven. In the 1990s he was promoted to deputy U.S. attorney.
Through the 1980s and '90s, Durham prosecuted or supervised every organized crime case in Connecticut. His team contributed critical evidence to the conviction in New York of Gambino crime family boss John Gotti.
He conceived the strategy to put CT's big cities a decade ahead of those in neighboring states in eradicating violent urban crack gangs - a strategy adopted elsewhere in the US. He demoted himself to asst USA ~2yrs ago, guilt, friends said, over spending too much time in Boston
"John was given that thing in Boston, I am quite convinced, because he has a reputation for being above the fray, of being absolutely incorruptible and of absolutely calling things the way he sees them," said Ira Grudberg, a defense lawyer in New Haven.
"Despite the fact that he can be a hard ass about certain things, I believe he is a real straight shooter."
Durham has built a career on the presumptive integrity of the criminal justice system.
Criminals are supposed to know that their punishments are just because the system operates without bias. Durham was sent to Boston as a special prosecutor to investigate signs that the system had failed.
Evidence produced during a federal criminal trial in the late 1990s suggested that a group of senior FBI agents, over a 30 year period, established a bizarre alliance with what was arguably New England's most ruthless criminal outfit.
For years, rumors flew in Boston that some criminals were committing murders and obstructing justice with FBI protection. It was suspected that men were wrongly convicted of crimes because the real criminals worked for the FBI.
The bureau dismissed the rumors as fantasy. Detectives from states as disparate as CT, OK & FL worked a series of murders connected to the jai alai industry and wound up with nothing but shared suspicion of the FBI and bitter knowledge that their cases dead-ended in Boston
All that is changing and, like him or not, Durham is the reason. A specially selected task force of investigators from around the country, operating under his direction, now appears on the way to succeeding where earlier investigations failed.
Allegations in the string of indictments Durham has obtained so far present an incredible picture: Two supposed FBI informants put LEO's to work for them. There is evidence that agents set up men for gangland murders for as little as a diamond engagement ring & a few 1000 dollars
Not surprisingly, the task force has met with resistance. It has come from FBI officials interested in protecting themselves and Massachusetts detectives afflicted by law enforcement's peculiar institutional jealousies.
But longtime associates describe Durham as determined to push on, even if he is increasingly put off by what his task force is finding
"Given what he is seeing & how corrupt, small fee, the whole system was, it's really a terrible job," said a federal judge who knows Durham well
"But somebody has to do this job. And I think that he understands that more than anybody. I know this is tearing him up. But on the other hand, would you want him after you? He may be getting no pleasure out of it. But he's like an avenging angel."
"He is going to leave here with a tremendous reputation, the guy who came in from outside and cleaned up a terrible situation," said a senior official in the Suffolk County DA's office that, in 1968, used bad evidence from the FBI to convict four apparently innocent men of murder
This is no big surprise for the army of Durham loyalists in Connecticut law enforcement.
FBI agents - and their bosses - get promoted when they win cases and that is pretty much a guarantee when Durham is prosecuting.
By the 1990s, not only was the bureau in Connecticut submitting investigations of sensitive matters for Durham's supervision, it was breaking bureau rules by, in effect, permitting him to assign agents.
In the early 1990s, a scrap of paper containing Durham's home address was found in the wing of the Hartford jail holding a group of mobsters judged sufficiently ruthless to be denied bail. Durham supervised their indictments and was preparing their prosecution.
Word moved quickly through the law enforcement grapevine. Heavily armed officers converged on the home and Durham was greeted in his own driveway by a shotgun-carrying agent.
"While he is very tough and aggressive," Williams said, "I've never noticed that he ever thought he had a halo. He's able to respect opposing points of view. And that makes him very special and very, very good at what he's doing."
At the press conference, Durham finally couldn't avoid a question.
"Does the DOJ have the stomach to pursue this investigation to its conclusion?" a reporter asked, meaning will the govt find some excuse to shut down the case to prevent further shredding the FBI's credibility?
It was the only question Durham answered.
"The government absolutely has the stomach," he said.
The two developed software to monitor and graphically display patterns in complex info systems. A bank marketing executive using the software could determine which online customers were clicking on links to info about home equity loans, then display info about those customers.
It takes no great leap of imagination to envision a CIA analyst using the software, connected into the right databases, to track terrorist activities. But it took In-Q-Tel to make that leap.
7. Revolving door. The top illegal lobbyist was former Rep. Heather Wilson of New Mexico. For a number of years, as Representative, she presumably was very friendly with Lockheed/Sandia of her area.
He had asked that the requests for information in the civil lawsuit be put on hold until he had completed his criminal investigation. Durham asked that he be given until the end of February to wrap up his work and has not asked for another extension.
“The CIA can now identify the number of videotapes that were destroyed,” said the letter by Acting U.S. Attorney Lev Dassin. “Ninety two videotapes were destroyed.”
As Mr. Obama prepares to leave the White House early next year, one of his legacies will be the office information technology upgrade that his staff has finally begun.
On Air Force One, administration officials sent emails over an air-to-ground Internet connection that was often no better than dial-up modems from the mid-1990s.
Part of the problem? Responsibility for WH technology has long been divvied up between four agencies, each with their own chief information officer: the National Security Council, the Executive Office of the President, the Secret Service and the White House Communications Agency
Bechtel Enterprises, Inc. has purchased a majority interest in Genuity Inc., a company that provides Internet services for medium-to-large-sized organizations in business, government, and higher education.
Issam Salah Hourani, his brother Devincci and his brother-in-law, Rakhat Aliyev were the targets of a campaign to denounce the 3 as “murderers, responsible for the torture, drugging, beating, sexual assault & death of Anastasiya Novikova, in 2004
Ms. Novikova, a television presenter for NTK television in Kazakhstan, fell to death from her Beirut apartment which was investigated and declared a suicide by the Lebanese authorities.