Thread by @thetrollbar

I'm about to list a large number (32 in fact) of hypothesis on the current political situation in the Anglosphere and West generally.

The reason I am doing is is to highlight the deficiency in our analyses challenging our critical assumptions.

Most political discourse today..

Amounts to an assertion of hypotheses, with little in the way of evidence to refute any of them. This leads to 'holistic analysis' (going with your gut, aka cognitive biases).

This works well in daily life (mostly) where a little rationality goes a long way -- not so much in

poltics at nation scale. There is no particular order or arrangement -- each one will be a separate tweet so we can pick and choose any we care to discuss:

H1 Existent America (as opposed to collapsing Neo-Liberal regime) should be defended as a Nation

By EA I mean...

post-1776 America on the main line of development that has gotten us to 2022 so far as 'one nation'.

H2 Existent Union occupation (post 1865) should be defended, same for post Wilson foreign policy regime, post FDR bureaucratic and security states

H3 The Union should return to the pan-White Wilsonian consensus ('melting pot' with our without racial intermarriage)

H4 The collapse of Financial Capital is inevitable because of demographics in Western Countries and its implications for growth

H5 America is a safe haven for external oligarchs including China, because our demographic is (still) growing and thus there is effective demand that is not existent in countries undergoing free fall demographic collapse.

H6 Oligarchs have factions that dominate political warfare and are represented in the Deep State (institutional basis of Civil Government, Law, Academics, and Journalism)

H7 The dominant Oligarchic faction is the Eastern Liberal Anglo-American alliance ('Boston Brahmins')

H8 Oligarchic factions parallel the 'schools' of Macroeconomics (East Coast Saltwater, West Coast Saltwater, interior Freshwater)

H9 Neo-Liberalism is identical with the Mount Pelerin Society / Monetarist / Neo-Conservative alignment

H10 Symptomatic Political Warfare is a Maoist, Mass Line Rebellion, properly diagnosed by UA

unconstrainedanalytics.org

H11 Soros backs the Obama faction, and uses dialectical methods

H12 Soros is a 'radical liberal' primarily concerned with implementing

... Popper's Open Society

H13 The Clintons were stopped by the Oligarchic faction that backed Trump

H14 Trump's performance upset all the Oligarchic factions to some degree

H15 China (or Russia, or the NAIS) are the principle operatives challenging Existent America

H16 Existent America is likely to fracture sometime in the next century

H17 Trump's backers were a faction of Oligarchs as named by /pol/ Insider Anon

H18 Reviving the Confederacy and Golden Circle are desirable

H19 Interfaith and Ecumenism are driven by Marxism

H20 The conservative element of oligarchical factions consists of X (supply X)

H21 The Truckers in Canada are backed by American and Albertan Oligarchs

H22 The Dollar as reserve currency (para-Bretton Woods) is unlikely to change in the medium term

H23 The Ukraine will be given to Russia bloodlessly

H24 Ripple (XRP) is an important cryptocurrency in the medium to long run

H25 The Oligarchs believe that America (and post-Capitalism) needs to be stabilised by 2026 at the latest

H26 COVID (masking and pushback) was an intentional, dialectical move to get the left and right to fight each other (political warfare)

H27 'Vaccines are about one thing, centralizing the hospital and pharmaceutical apparatus'

H28 Canada was deliberately targeted for a Revolution

H29 What is Wise or Prudent about Revolution?

H30 A simple bottom up (localists capture the political food chain) will not work.

H31 Creating a Schmittian executive or Emperor/Fuehrer in Washington will not work

H32 The Catholic Church should have political potency in America, provided it can avoid capture by 'Democracy' or becoming a tool of the NAIS

Remember these are *hypotheses* -- I haven't said whether I would vote yea or nay on any of them, much less presented evidence to support or refute them.

Some of them might not be interesting at all, or in dire need of recasting.

Presented as food for thought.

@threadreaderapp unroll