Already basically net cash, expects ARO 80% paid down this year.
Capital Returns Plan is to split discretionary FCF (ex Capex & ARO funding) 50/50 between:
1) Quarterly div
2) buybacks/spec divs/ dealing with convertible in some fashion.
⬇️ 1/N
- Say CapEx comes in around ~$130m for the year, contribution to Mine Retirement fund @ $100m...
not unreasonable at all to guess at ~$300m in returns coming to shareholders through Q2-Q4
2/N ⬇️
Met shipped 10% more volume than I would have thought, but costs were higher than expected (~$85/ton) and sales prices lower ($206/ton for coking). Would love clarity on what their seaborne realizations are relative to the USEC prints for HVA/HVB/LV...
3/N ⬇️
Only have ~500k tons priced & committed to domestic met.
AKA, we could see seaborne shipments close to 2m tons in Q1'22. That is bonkers - leaving themselves completely exposed to whatever post-Olympics has in store for met market. I believe @acosgrove003 called that, GJ
4/n⬇️
Thermal looks good, no surprises there, costs didn't inflate as much as met did. Taking the over on costs, margin looks like $3/ton for '22.
Overall good quarter, but curious for more clarity on what they expect out of met realizations relative to benchmark pricing going forward
And potentially a lot, lot more depending on what happens with the convertible
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ordinarily, steel px leads coking coal indexes, and I’d run as far as I could from the ferrous supply chain while HRC/EHR fall of a cliff (which they are).
However… 1/n
FOB AUS coking coal is trading above $430/tn (ATH’s) in the middle of china’s seasonal crude steel slump. 2/n
This is pure, unadulterated pirate booty for Met producers with the opportunity to sell into the seaborne market.
Now, I’m an idiot, and truly don’t know why seaborne met is so high right now, but it probably has something to do with this chart: 3/n