#HumanForever is out now in paperback. Canada and GoFundMe dramatize why I wrote it, published it on chain, and priced it in bitcoin. Our political life is being obsolesced—to terraform our natural and God-given humanity into a collectivist cyborg swarm. canonic.xyz/books/1YV9yExb…
Neither paralysis nor wars of words or dreams will save us. Our sacred and natural humanity, and the digital rights inherent in it, must be actively, physically preserved. We must retake rightful technological control—the aim of a #2ndAmendmentforCompute.
Our rights to mine, buy, sell, and use bitcoin and cryptocurrency to create culture and markets; to buy and use high-powered GPUs; and to do so free from enclosure in a social credit system of perpetual search and arbitrary seizure—all inhere in our Constitution and our humanity.
“Tech” is not the foe, even in human enhancement or advancement. As tool and weapon it inheres in our natural and sacred human life. But both are used to wage not only physical but spiritual war. And digital entities’ world conquest retrieves reality’s theological character.
These infinite, invisible, interoperable entities behave as, until a few years ago, only angels and demons were thought to behave. Their triumph raises ultimate questions—about why to bother being human and suffering our humanity—that human imagination can’t sufficiently answer.
As a result, modern and postmodern justifications for our humanity and existence are collapsing. All now rush for salvation into the arms of gods or idols. All civilization states that are digital powers rush to refound their sovereignty on their deepest theological grounds.
That makes a special burden and challenge for America, barred from establishing a religion—yet deeply vulnerable to the establishment of a religion, like the one our regime’s rulers are establishing, that masquerades as the ideology of ethicists or the best practices of engineers
Their religions abandon the sacred character of our given humanity. They squabble over recondite creedal details but their diverse subgods and idols converge on posthuman cyborg collectivism. Today these are the terms of the digital politics of spiritual war. A war we can win.
Victory comes by defense of our inherent digital rights and recovery of people’s competence to apply our deepest wisdom about our identity to the control and use of our most powerful technologies. Bitcoin, among them, people can use right now, as I published #HumanForever to show
We are human and had better get good at it: no shortcuts, no substitutes. The glory that befits a good people must run through the humility of accepting responsibility—a word that teaches its grammar in the theological character of our inescapable reality:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For months I’ve been telling all who can hear (including Congress) that the Russian civilization-state’s response to the digital catastrophe was signaled by its construction of a vast cathedral announcing a new and deeper relationship between the church and the armed forces. 🧵
The catastrophe in its geopolitical form is the obsolescence of any regime unable to establish sovereignty on digital ground. This has to do with the Main Cathedral of the Armed Forces as the catastrophe in its anthropological form retrieves the theological character of reality.
That retrieval is due to digital making foundational and reopening once again the ultimate questions about who and why we are and why we should bother with any of it—our life, our humanity, our sanity, our suffering. Questions (post)modern word games and feelings fail to answer
“One technology created within the digital medium has arisen with a clear and already well-functioning capability to move us past the passive faith in algorithmic fiat that today characterizes the approaching singularity of weaponized information...”
“back into the position of human beings extending rather than eliminating our senses and faculties to conduct arms-length but trustably face-to-face collaborative work in culture creation and valuation. This is bitcoin...”
I think a lot about Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor, and Nikephoras II Phokas, Eastern Roman Emperor.
While I can’t substantiate it, the story about Nikephoras is that he wanted to canonize fallen soldiers himself and the Patriarch said no. Henry, as is known, wanted to invest bishops with sacred authority himself and was also negged, ultimately renouncing claim to select popes.
The question of whether holy emperors could take secular control of religious appointments appears likely to have come to a general head around the turn of the millennium. In Christendom the outcome expressed for the answer a powerful no.
Anyone hoping to function in a digital age elite must grapple with issues like those raised here. Many pitfalls and ancient snares, devilish problems for people losing ancient wisdom. So, a few pointers:
The emergent ontology of social injustice responds to the problem of how to assign blame and take responsibility for the behavior of machines religiously, by spiritualizing transgression. People/machines “are” racist/sexist/whatever, but what’s more, the -ism is a -ness, spirit
The insight or instinct that only religion can be authoritative enough for digital cybernetics—for the re-establishment of control over both humans and machines—is crucial. But the execution immediately raises terrifying paradoxes...
A certain strain of intelligent tech criticism warns that passive acceptance of data determinism kills human creativity and leads to civilization necrosis. But...
this insight is unfortunately highly susceptible to being absorbed into the idea that only our divine-like powers of boundless imagination differentiate us from the bots and therefore are the only things that can save us...
the difficult reality is that our faculties of imagination are not magical or godlike in the sense of infinite or salvific power; in fact it is this reality above all that our bots ram home every instant with accumulating inescapable force...