So everyone has been paying attention to Russia and Ukraine recently.
But, in my opinion, there is a bigger strategic play going on by Russia. More significant. More long term.
A thread.
It's all about the Wagner group in Africa.
Now Wagner, for those of you who haven't heard, are a Russian mercenary group ("private military company") owned by a batshit crazy oligarch called Evgeny Prigozhin who, surprise surprise, is a mate of Vlad.
For an absolutely jaw-dropping story about the Wagner Group in the Central African Republic see this fantastic FT article
But it's their activities in Libya, Mali & Burkina Faso that I wanna concentrate on. This is the big strategic play that Russia is making. Long term. Very smart.
In previous threads I've written about the disaster that is going to hit the Sahel countries as temperatures and populations go up over the next 30 years.
So in Mali something very interesting has been going on.
Since 2013, the French and the UN have had sizeable deployments to "support the Malian government in combatting terrorism" (or some such official-speak).
But this wasn't working because it was treating the symptoms ("Terrorism") rather than the causes (climate, overpopulation and poor government).
So, after a couple of coups in Mali (2020 & 2021) the French announced that they were drawing down, and they are now expected to announce that they are leaving completely
The relationship has gone really bad - the French ambo was expelled from Mali in January - which is massive: the two countries have generally had a close relationship since decolonialisation (some would say that it never really decolonialised).
In steps Wagner usurping a role traditionally played by France - that of supporting military juntas who take power by force. The newest coup's leaders are using Wagner to prop them up. france24.com/en/live-news/2…
What about Burkina Faso?
It's pretty similar actually, with a slight twist. There was a coup in BF in Jan 2022. But this time the rumours are that Wager actually supported the coupers to take control. I heard this from a little birdy on the ground, but it has since been reported thedailybeast.com/burkina-faso-p…
And finally Libya, where Wager reportedly have 7,000 men fighting for Haftar bbc.com/news/world-afr…
So what's the strategic play here?
Well, go back to my thread on climate change in the Sahel leading to a lot of conflict and a lot of migration over the next 30 years.
Russia traditionally hasn't had a lot of influence in the Sahel and the Mediterranean coast of Africa - the external powers were usually the colonial powers (France, UK, Italy).
But by setting up camp in Mali, Burkina Faso and Libya, Russia is now able to influence the conflicts, and refugee flows into Europe over the next 30 years.
Think about how much Europe lost its shit over refugees in Belarus recently, or when Erdogan threatened to open his borders to Syrians. Of the 2014/5 crisis in the Med.
(We're also about to see a lot of Afghans turn up in Europe who left last Aug/Sep/Oct/Nov (cont))
What's going to happen in the Sahel over the next 30 years will dwarf all of that - and Russia will be able to turn the migrants on and off like a tap.
Europe is dozing. They need to get their shit together.
ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let’s take a look at the economic side of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
A 🧵
Once wars go beyond a couple of months, they tend to become a battle of the economies—that is, who is will to turn a bigger part of their economy into a machine that produces arms and munitions.
Obviously, if you have two sides that are both willing to turn as much as possible of their economies over to the war, then the side with the bigger economy will tend to win (all other things being equal).
The US has decided to allow Ukraine to use longer-range missiles in Russia.
This brings to a close a pretty feckless period of US policy towards Ukraine.
A 🧵
It’s quite hard to even work out what the White House is trying to do these days, apart from vainly responding to events.
Let’s dig into it.
This permissions - that Ukraine be allowed to use the longer range US supplied ATACAMS missiles (range 300km) inside Russia - is all of a piece with a series of decisions stretching right back to 2014.
There is a lot going on in the news at the moment, but there is a story that is consistently being underreported: Russia.
A 🧵
(potentially with 🖍️)
And in the UK - we have to recognise that Russia, and her actions, are the NUMBER ONE strategic threat that we face.
(You wouldn’t know this from the House of Commons where a lot more time is spent debating the Middle East - which - although it is important, is an order of magnitude less important to the UK in strategic terms than the Russia story)