2. But the world of finance is interconnected. Many Canadian banks operate in the U.S., have customers there, and are also regulated there. Does Trudeau think he can order @RBC to seize a customer's bank account in Florida? That's what the Emergencies Act order suggests.
3. But it's not just Canadian banks with customers in the U.S. It's U.S. banks operating in Canada. Look at Trudeau's emergency economic measures order: gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2022/…
It covers foreign banks and insurance companies operating in Canada. So, mainly American banks.
4. If you're a U.S. bank doing business in Canada, you've always known that we were a liberal democracy with the rule of law, including free trade agreements. That's gone. Now it's Chavez-style political expropriation of opponents bank accounts.
Should U.S. banks comply?
5. Here's a list of foreign banks in Canada. They are specifically covered in Trudeau's expropriation order: osfi-bsif.gc.ca/Eng/wt-ow/Page…
If you were in charge of privacy, legal compliance, political affairs, etc., who would you be more afraid of: Trudeau, or the U.S. Congress?
6. Polls say it's likely the U.S. Congress will turn Republican in November. What kind of hearings, subpoenas, investigations will pro-trucker, anti-Trudeau, anti-cancel-culture Republicans have for U.S. banks that willingly served up their U.S. customers to Trudeau?
7. Or -- for that matter -- if those U.S. banks served up their Canadian customers to Trudeau?
If you were in charge of compliance and risk management, what would you do?
If it were Venezuela, you'd close shop. It's Canada. What do you do? Resist Trudeau? Delay? Or comply?
8. We know for a fact that a number of American Congressmen and Senators were supportive of the truckers. I bet some of them, or their staff or families or friends, made donations, too. If you're a U.S. bank do you turn them in to Trudeau? Do you actually seize their property?
9. Here's a timely reminder about Chrystia Freeland, the World Economic Forum executive who serves as Trudeau's Finance Minister.
At age 45, she needed her parents to cosign her mortgage.
10. I'm not making fun of someone who needs parents to buy them a house at 45. I'm making fun of that person claiming to be an authority on banking. She has the reverse Midas touch -- everything she handles turns pear-shaped. She is going to destroy trust in Canada's banks.
11. Trudeau also orders insurance companies to cancel insurance on any truck he says is a mean, honking kind of truck (seriously though, how are insurance companies to know the difference between a good truck an a truck Trudeau hates?): gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2022/…
12. As with Trudeau's seizure of bank accounts, his insurance edict applies to a huge number of U.S. insurance companies. Here's a list: osfi-bsif.gc.ca/Eng/fi-if/ic-s…
Are you actually going to cancel insurance on a customer because a politician says so?
Is that legal under U.S. law?
13. Let's say you're a U.S. insurer of a U.S. citizen driving a U.S. truck between Detroit and Windsor. And he honks his horn and says F&ck Trudeau. Are you going to cancel his insurance for exercising his U.S. First Amendment, because some banana republic politician says so?
14. Trudeau says his victims are banned from suing banks or insurance companies. That may be true in Canada where civil liberties have been suspended.
But it's not true in the U.S. Would a U.S. company violate a U.S. contract with a U.S. citizen because Little Fidel said so?
15. Trudeau said a reason for martial law is that the truckers are hurting the economy. That's a laugh -- Trudeau's two-year lockdown has done far more damage. But destabilizing banking, insurance and general Canada-U.S. trade law is something only a woke know-nothing could do.
16. Maybe Chrystia Freeland's parents can help out their grown daughter again.
He’s like Grant Bristow, the leader of the racist Heritage Front who was really a CSIS agent.
Diagolon’s purpose is to discredit conservatives, give fodder to the media and provide an excuse to censors.
It’s funny & pitiful to see him blame the Jews for a fraud alert in his banking. No bank in Canada has a Jewish CEO; all are widely held in the stock market. I bet he blames the Jews when he hits his thumb with a hammer.
This isn’t authentic. No-one is this stupid. It’s an op.
I should disclose that this bigoted fed is actually suing me for calling him a bigoted fed. That’s obviously part of the op, too. Everyone calls him racist; he is. But he’s only suing Rebel News. Like I say: he’s a fed.
2. Mark Joseph, senior litigation counsel from The Democracy Fund is also live-tweeting. I'll try to interview him today.
@TDF_Can is crowdfunding the legal bills for Tamara. If you can help, please go to . You'll get a charitable tax receipt.HelpTamara.com
3. The court has just convened. I'm not sure why the slow start. The trial is in the phase of closing arguments. On her feet now is Diane Magas, one of the two lawyers for Tamara's co-accused, Chris Barber. She describing some of the requirements for mens rea -- a guilty mind.
1. Here’s an 11-minute phone message from Tommy Robinson explaining how police arrested him under the Terrorism Act for the express purpose of forcing him to answer political, personal and business questions — nothing to do with terrorism.
2. You can see that this was a malicious, arbitrary and illegal use of the Terrorism Act. They knew Tommy had committed no terrorism, never has, never will. They just wanted to grab his phone and all of its contents without a search warrant. And do the same with their questions.
3. There's a Kafkaesque nature to the Terrorism Act. It requires you to answer questions and give documents to the police. If you don't, that's a crime. So they can arrest you with no crime; but if you don't want to tell them everything they can think of, that's the crime.
2. Click the link to read it for yourself -- it's a long document: Here's a screenshot of a key passage. If you're arrested under the law, you cannot remain silent. You must hand over anything (without a search warrant). assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f63b9…
3. You do have a right to consult a lawyer. But police can delay your right to consult one.
This is an astonishing law, designed for extremely rare instances where, for example, a terrorist knows about a ticking bomb that's about to go off.
I'm in Lethbridge for the long-awaited trial of the Coutts Three, who prosecutors call the "leadership group" of the peaceful protest at the border in 2022. You can follow our journalism at and chip in to the legal defence at .TruckerTrial.com Coutts3.com
The three men -- Marco Van Huigenbos, Alex Van Herk and George Janzen -- are on trial for mischief. They have chosen a trial by jury. I think it's a good choice -- the common sense of ordinary people is likely more friendly to freedom than an elite, establishment judge.
The jury selection is underway. The first juror has presented to the judge, who asked him a series of questions that (I understand) was agreed to by prosecutors and defence counsel. The first juror is approved.
2. By the way, Sgt. Josephs gets paid a lot of money to abuse citizens. According to the 2022 Sunshine list, he took home a whopping $177,000/year, after a 16% raise:
3. Sgt. Josephs can't control his anger and goes from zero to rage in about 60 seconds. He became famous for losing his cool a decade ago when he arrested a young woman for blowing bubbles at him. It was a deeply embarrassing moment for @TorontoPolice: