Heparin. Where have I heard this before?
Ah. The "H" in the MATH+ protocol.
It still blows my mind how much the good folks at FLCCC have gotten correct, and how much earlier than most, and how much shit they've gotten for their trouble.
Ah. The "H" in the MATH+ protocol.
It still blows my mind how much the good folks at FLCCC have gotten correct, and how much earlier than most, and how much shit they've gotten for their trouble.
https://twitter.com/Undergroundcou1/status/1494108093902430213
Even if we ignore ivm & hcq, even if we assume they do nothing.
They were first and ahead of their time in recommending corticosteroids. How many did they save until their insight became accepted?
They were recommending fluvoxamine almost a year ago. How many did that save?
They were first and ahead of their time in recommending corticosteroids. How many did they save until their insight became accepted?
They were recommending fluvoxamine almost a year ago. How many did that save?
The painful truth that most just can't come to terms with, is that with what is commonly accepted science today, the MATH+ protocol by @Covid19Critical @PierreKory & Co would have been your best bet at any time in the past few years if you got covid. Maybe there's a case to be
... made that some or most of what they administered doesn't help. Unlike remdesivir though, the things they recommended have almost certainly negligible downsides. And the things we already know work would have saved the person, while "mainstream medicine" was waiting around.
The truth is that doctors are terrible bayesians, and as I'm realizing, they're not even taught how to think analytically. Most of them seem to just want to follow guidelines. While people die. They don't have the confidence to make real decisions that are informed by fresh data
..., by their direct experience and instincts, and the particular characteristics of the patient. This is what medicine used to be, and it's almost completely being phased out in favor of top-down one-size-fits-all cover-your-ass guidelines. Set by people who haven't treated even
...one patient. And with the feedback loop broken, nobody is responsible, nobody has skin in the game, and the decision points recede into the further reaches of the galaxy, the region known as "big pharma". Those guys have no problem making decisions. But those decisions are
... somewhat self-serving. It's OK though. Better than nothing, right?
In any case, I digress and am showing the loss of trust in the medical profession I've developed throughout this pandemic.
At the same time, however, people like @Covid19Critical remind me that some doctors
In any case, I digress and am showing the loss of trust in the medical profession I've developed throughout this pandemic.
At the same time, however, people like @Covid19Critical remind me that some doctors
... still remember their oath, have courage to make decisions, dare to apply the latest data to each patient, and quickly iterate as more becomes known.
And that's why, even though they're not always right, they're always less wrong than most.
Thank you FLCCC. You are heroes.
And that's why, even though they're not always right, they're always less wrong than most.
Thank you FLCCC. You are heroes.
If you want to sample just a small taste of what the FLCCC are dealing with in terms of all out warfare, read the following thread about their retracted paper on the MATH+ protocol. As I dug into it, I couldn't believe what I was seeing. It wasn't subtle.
https://twitter.com/alexandrosM/status/1460474908706697217?t=MeIS3uwSs1g8n-J_ctDf6w&s=19
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
