I went to the NRA's Great American Outdoor Show and talked to some members about the corruption allegations against the group's leadership. Here's what they had to say: thereload.com/members-expres…
In covering the NRA the last several years I've been able to talk with its board members, pr reps, lawyers, and critics. But the cancelation of their major gathers has made it more difficult to speak with regular members. That changed over the weekend. thereload.com/members-expres…
Some attendees, like Tony Colgan, said they were up to date in the corruption allegations against NRA leadership and it kept them from renewing their memberships. thereload.com/members-expres…
Most people I spoke with said they were concerned about the corruption but didn't necessarily feel they could trust what they're being told by the media or the NRA.
Ultimately, those I spoke to said they still believed in the NRA's mission. Some felt the group was their only viable option at the national level. Even those who'd let their memberships lapse said they'd join again if they felt their gun rights were under attack.
There's a lot more detail in the story, including a run down of how the NRA has shed members in recent years and what leadership is accused of doing wrong. You should read the whole thing. thereload.com/members-expres…
After you read it, you should sign up for @TheReloadSite's free weekly newsletter to get more sober, serious firearms reporting and analysis delivered right to your inbox! thereload.com/free-newslette…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
He should consider siege weapons instead, though. A trebuchet or ballista firing pillows into Ottawa would be even more fun to watch.
Ok. Ottawa is further from the border than any siege weapon is really capable of getting an object. But I've thought about this and the WWI Paris Gun is an option. Ottawa is about 70 miles from Waddington, New York. The Paris Gun's range is about 81 miles.
This tweet goes to the idea many gun-control advocates are more concerned about regulating aesthetics than any else. This is a semi-automatic 22lr rifle. It is designed to look like an AR-15, but it's functionally the same as a Ruger 10/22 or any number of other 22lr rifles.
Whatever you think of the tounge-in-cheek marketing approach here, this certainly isn't a "weapon of war" by any standard. 22lr is a small round commonly used fwhen training kids. The objection here is to how the rifle looks rather than any connection it has to actual gun crime.
Here is the JR-15 next to the Ruger 10/22. They look different, but they are both magazine-fed semi-auto 22lr rifles. The main difference in function is the JR-15 has an integrated safety lock to prevent unauthorized use.
The hearing over former board member Rocky Marshall's attempt to intervene in the New York suit against the NRA is happening. Marshall and others are trying to intervene as a way of providing an alternative representation of members.
The judge seems skeptical of letting Marshall intervene without evidence he was illegitimately pushed off the NRA board.
Marshall's lawyers are noting they have different claims against the NRA than what New York has brought. They note that a big one is potentially trying to recover legal fees that the interveners believe are excessive.
This is an out-of-court settlement, but it's still a really bad development for the gun industry as a whole. Expect these sorts of lawsuits to ramp up after this.
The firearms industry disowned the settlement. NSSF, the industry's trade group, blamed the now-defunct Remington Outdoors Company insurers for accepting the deal. It says the company would have won in court.
NSSF says the Remington settlement has no legal impact beyond the parties involved. It says federal liability protections remain as strong as before the case. thereload.com/remington-insu…
In recent months, the gun-control groups have increased their public criticism of Biden, which I find pretty fascinating. I'm not sure it's true Biden could do much more on guns than he already is. But they all seem to feel otherwise.
Interestingly, you did not see these sorts of public attacks on Trump from gun-rights groups even though he dealt with many of the same limitations. There weren't any major pro-gun bills passed under Trump just as there haven't been any major gun-control bills under Biden.
The gun-control groups are much more comfortable going after Biden than the gun-rights groups were going after Trump (although, it did happen from time to time).