Kevin Ring Profile picture
Feb 18 4 tweets 2 min read
When the GOP takes over the House (and maybe the Senate) in November, and the talk of how much this development will hurt justice reform efforts, remember this moment. Pending in Congress is a bill - the EQUAL Act - that would reduce unnecessary prison sentences by 67,00 years.
The bill was approved by the House with 361 votes. If brought to the floor of the Senate tomorrow, it surely would receive more than 60 votes. It is the only decarceration measure that has broad support from law enforcement organizations, like @ndaajustice,
conservative advocates, like @RightOnCrime, and usual justice reform allies. It would allow @POTUS to correct his support for the 1986 law that created the crack disparity. Most importantly, it would reunite thousands of families without increasing crime.
So why isn't it getting done? Why not bring it up for a vote? Why not add it to the next must-pass spending bill? If Members of Congress are going to keep 7,000 people - 91% of whom are Black - in prison longer even when they have the votes to fix it, they should explain why.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin Ring

Kevin Ring Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KevinARing

Feb 18
Buckle up for a longer #KeepThemHome update:
In AG Garland’s announcement that DOJ would not require people on CARES Act home confinement to return en masse at the end of the pandemic, he said DOJ would begin a rule-making process.
The process is to determine who BOP should bring back to prison. FAMM and others have been arguing no one should be sent back unless they broke the rules. BOP in a memo repeated its view people with lengthy sentences remaining should be brought back to prison for programming.
In fact, BOP said sentence length should be an important factor in deciding whom to bring back.
We sent a letter to Dep AG Lisa Monaco recently explaining why that reasoning is flawed. We gave real-life examples and the first was Kendrick Fulton. We wrote:
Read 18 tweets
Jan 31
#KeepThemHome update: Some folks are getting scared that a recent BOP memo means that certain people on CARES Act home confinement are going to have to go back to prison when the pandemic ends. While that has always been a possibility, I want to share why it's not time to panic.
The original OLC memo was in response to a BOP request for clarification that BOP could bring some people on CARES Act HC back to prison if they thought they would benefit from additional programming, etc. OLC shocked the world in Jan '21 by saying you have to bring everyone back
When OLC revised its memo last month, it said BOP didn't have to bring everyone back - hooray - but that BOP's original interpretation was accurate and that BOP COULD choose to bring some people back. Now a memo from BOP's departing general counsel outlining how they might do...
Read 8 tweets
Jul 25, 2021
The New York Times story last week has generated a lot of buzz about the home confinement issue. For newcomers, here is a get-you-up-to-speed thread. nytimes.com/2021/07/19/us/…
In March 2020, Congress passed the CARES Act to expand BOP’s discretion to give home confinement in order to combat the spread of Covid. This was smart. Typically, BOP is only authorized to send ppl to home confinement for a bit of their sentence – 6 mos or 10%, whichever is less
The CARES Act authorized DOJ to give more time on home confinement so long as the AG found that COVID was “materially affecting” BOP’s functioning. Barr did that right away and DOJ established strict eligibility criteria – to get extended home confinement, a person:
Read 22 tweets
Jun 26, 2021
The Biden administration last week sent a 76-year-old cancer survivor back to federal prison because she went to a computer class without prior written approval. You read that right. #KeepThemHome / 1 washingtonpost.com/local/public-s…
The fact that Gwen is sitting in DC jail right now is infuriating. She had been on home confinement for a year under the CARES Act & was helping us push the Biden admin to keep the 4,000 people like her home. She had become the face of this effort./2
nbcnews.com/now/video/fede…
We have been telling the Biden team since the transition that they had to do something with this group. Regardless of the OLC memo, these people could not be on ankle monitors for years. That, to clarify my quote in the Post story, is what is contrary to human nature. /3
Read 9 tweets
Jun 22, 2021
I’m not a Deep State conspiracy guy, but how in the world is the National Association of Assistant US Attorneys a thing? If they simply fought for higher pay and less accountability, which they do, that would be one thing.
But they take positions on national policy. In fact, today, their testimony on the crack disparity begins by saying we don’t take positions on legislation and then proceeds to state all of the reasons they oppose the EQUAL Act.
Meanwhile, the Justice Department, where they work, supports the EQUAL Act. In what other agency does this happen? If the Secretary Blinken testifies in favor of preferred trade status with China, can a bunch of State Dept underlings testify in opposition?
Read 5 tweets
Jun 21, 2021
For the past 15 years, no one - NO ONE - has suggested that federal powder cocaine mandatory minimums are too light. Now that legislation has been introduced to make crack sentences equal to powder sentences, some are suggesting the powder thresholds should be lowered. What?!?!
Keep in mind that when the drug safety valve was expanded in the First Step Act just 3 years ago, no one expressed any concern that this would allow more powder defendants to get shorter sentences. (We did hear that about fentanyl.) Most people who support reform acknowledge...
that weight alone isn't a good proxy for culpability or role. So why now do we only hear about the need to toughen powder sentences when an effort is made to adjust crack penalties to equalize them? Seems so disingenuous. Could it be because cocaine is a growing problem?
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(