Putin doesn't care if it's convincing or that something "looks bad". He only cares about consequences. He invaded Georgia in 2008 & Ukraine in 2014. He's still in power and still runs the richest mafia in the world.
Putin has been in power for 22 years, crushing Russian society while killing, jailing, and exiling all rivals and critics. He has assassinated across Europe and made war on neighbors. Calling anything he does a "miscalculation" requires proving it.
"Doesn't Putin realize how bad this looks?!" is one of most idiotic critiques of his oppression and aggression. Maybe he's better at being a brutal dictator than you are. Nemtsov murdered. Navalny poisoned and jailed. Ukraine occupied. How does that look?
Putin is still invited to Davos, still hiring corrupt Western officials to be his lapdogs, still getting pipeline deals. His cronies & their families are still enjoying the good life in the free world with their looted billions. How does that look?
Putin knows better than anyone how the West could unite and deter him by supporting his targets and going after his money. That the US & Europe decline to do so he interprets, correctly, as a green light to continue his attacks.
He'll attack Ukraine again because after the last dozen hostile acts the West said, "Oh, this is the end of Putin & Russia! It's a rogue state!" but went right back to business as usual. More Russian gas, more summits, more visas and real estate for his mafia.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s not that they think they wouldn’t be confirmed, at least not in most cases. It’s that they want to plant a big flag early that there will be no transparency or oversight of Trump's wishes and power. Everything will be like this.
Putin steadily reshaped Russia's fragile democracy with the willing aid of the Russian Duma (Congress) and courts who didn’t want to cross him. Power is voluntarily ceded to the president and an autocratic vertical is created. Federal over state power next.
Same with all the constitutional changes that Putin made to cement his power. Why would a dictator bother with laws and elections? They want the argument of "well, everything was done legally so it’s fine". Autocrats adore sham democracy.
I’ll be writing on the election soon, but a few thoughts. Beyond the tactical, the resounding result is more evidence that far-right success follows far-left overreach. The media normalized Trump, but also downplayed how strongly many Americans disliked leftist agitation. 1/7
I.e., the prevailing tone was that leftist social agendas were simply progress, and anyone who didn’t embrace them was a fascist or dinosaur. But even if that’s an argument to be had on a talk show, it provokes moderate resentment and is a losing proposition electorally. 2/7
Harris was what we thought she was in 2020, an ineffectual candidate who only had a chance because she was running against Trump. The Dems missed the chance to find a stronger one due to Biden’s refusal to step down, as I proposed in October 2023. 3/7wsj.com/articles/biden…
American elections vote for people, not parties. This isn’t complicated. I supported GOP candidates almost exclusively before Trump, even meeting with some of their campaigns. Trump and the MAGA GOP have nothing to do with those good men or their policies.
If you had bothered to learn anything about me, my background, and my decades of public writing and speaking on politics, or even read my article you replied to, you would realize how dangerous Trump must be for me to endorse Harris. But Trump makes it obvious and necessary.
This list of questions are about politics and social tides. What a luxury to have those arguments, to vote your beliefs and opinions! In 2028, if the GOP has recovered its sanity, perhaps I will support Harris's challenger, as I supported Romney, McCain, and Haley.
When I was forced to escape Putin's crackdown in Russia and made my home in America, I never imagined I would be warning my new home about the threat of authoritarianism. But thanks to Trump, here we are. My article: thedispatch.com/article/us-des…
My endorsement of Harris is an endorsement of democracy, of institutions, of the country I grew up admiring from afar. America must not fall into the corrupt oligarchy that MAGA wants to build, one modeled on Trump's idol Putin, btw.
I warned about Trump from the beginning because I know from experience what autocrats look & sound like. I also know from experience what Communists sound like, and Harris, for all my concerns about American far left, is no Communist.
Like the Russian oligarchs, Musk sees himself as part of a shadow government—outside and above, unaccountable. It would be far worse with him inside Trump's government, operating with great power but no transparency. I’m sure Putin is a valuable mentor.
I called the Putin system an unholy mix of Adam Smith and Marx; they nationalize the costs and privatize the profits. They loot the state and then turn the state into a looting machine. Look at how Trump runs his campaigns, his foreign policy. Friends & family for profit.
Musk spews Russian misinformation & twists this platform into his image to elect Trump. It was purchased at great loss and dubious foreign cash for this purpose. Why, because he and his handlers really think the foaming, incoherent criminality of Trump is good for America?
Dictatorships export sabotage, murder, and terror into the free world, and not only against dissidents like the brave Masih. Unless there are real consequences, such campaigns will only spread.
It’s the democratic world that often downplays and covers up these attacks against their citizens, residents, and sovereignty. To avoid "escalation," of course, meaning having the courage to actually do something. This creates impunity and escalation by the terror states.
Remember what happened after the 2006 murder of Alexander Litvinenko in London with a nuclear toxin that could have caused a mass casualty event. Successive UK admins kept the investigation quiet, even as Putin's pet assassin was elevated in Moscow.