Thread by @kateneuropsych

@debraj112 Same Iine in research circles when you talk about diversity in research funding ("but they have to be generalizable studies"-- FOR WHO, WP?) "Diversity researchers have to have a credible track record" (YOU MEAN LIKE ALL THE NEW INEXPERIENCED WM & WW researchers you just
1/

@debraj112 funded?) And when addressing the HUGE GAP in including Culturally relevant research protocols, research protocals that reference culturally appropriate/specific norms and the idea that such protocols should be included across all research as part of the general protocols you
2/

@debraj112 create or present ("You can't do that b/c you HAVE TO ASK EVERYONE THE SAME QUESTIONS-doest matter that because they can't relate you get a negative response for that measure when infact if you tailor it in such a way that it tracks with culturally relevant experiences
3/

@debraj112 language and references RESULTS WOULD BE SIGNIFICANT thereby nullifying the idea that when results within Af-Am populations are significant: the individual is either malingering or deeply psychotic). But RACISM...Which is ubiquitously kept in place by the very WP who LOUDLY
4/

@debraj112 CLAIM not to be racist, invested in or clouded by White Supremacy. It's so much like clockwork you know it's "the play dumb to dismiss you" approach. Cept WP arent fooling any one but themselves
5/
End

@debraj112 @threadreaderapp unroll compile