If anything, I think @sandylocks is being too generous here. It’s hard to see how what we’re witnessing now would have been possible without too many people on the center not just trying to duck away, but actively helping to legitimize the white reactionary counter-mobilization.
A concrete example for what @sandylocks rightfully calls media complicity in this short thread below - absolutely no journalistic justification for the WaPo to publish such bad-faith / illiterate nonsense.
“I defended the crusade against CRT, but I want nothing to do with these authoritarian education bills” is really not a credible position. It was never difficult to discern the white reactionary political project behind the anti-“CRT” moral panic, and what its end goal would be.
“Who could have seen this coming?” is really not much of an excuse when the rightwing activist chiefly responsible for starting this reactionary crusade has been loudly and proudly telling the world for months why and how he got the CRT panic going and what the end goal was.
Those who are engaged in this reactionary crusade never made much effort to conceal their motives or the worldview that animated them. They adopted the language of “concern,” but it was directed almost solely against Black authors and a bizarre bogeyman version of “the Left.”
Those who wanted to see were always able to situate the anti-“CRT” crusade in a long tradition of reactionary moral panics - the latest iteration of a struggle to stave off and discredit political, social, and cultural changes that conservatives perceive as threatening.
Those who wanted to see were always able to tie the anti-“CRT” panic into the larger struggle over power, status, and respect (who deserves it, and who doesn’t), over whether or not the perspectives of traditionally marginalized groups deserve to be part of the American story.
Those who wanted to see always emphasized how this was part of the larger political project of white Christian nationalism, of an attempt by white Christians to preserve their privilege to define American identity and delineate the boundaries of what is acceptable in America.
Those who used their public platforms to legitimize the anti-“CRT” crusade should reflect on their complicity now that the reactionary political project which they helped along succeeds as planned and produces the intended results in the form of these rightwing education bills.
Addendum: As he so often does, @lionel_trolling puts it perfectly.
This is a key point. Every time I mention how the Right is embracing the threat of political violence against supposedly “Un-American” enemies, I get a flurry of “Where were you when those woke barbarians destroyed our cities?! The violence is coming from the Left!!!” replies.
This has become dogma on the Right: That the country is facing an onslaught from a radically “Un-American,” extremist “Left” that is violently threatening to destroy everything the nation is supposed to stand for. And that the Democratic Party has been taken over by those forces.
That’s how they’re giving themselves permission to embrace whatever radical measures are deemed necessary to defeat this “Un-American” enemy. If the nation is under acute threat, nothing is beyond the pale to defend it. Democracy? The rule of law? Who cares!
I mean, politics aside, this is quite bizarre. There is absolutely no evidence presented here. None. A purely ideological statement, masquerading as “journalism.”
I don’t disagree with this - it captures the pathologies of access journalism precisely. I do think, however, that we shouldn’t focus solely on the opportunistic nature, as ideology always defines the limits of opportunism. The person who wrote this piece can’t be fully agnostic.
This, exactly - and these centrists receive active support from journalists who are fully on board with the project of fighting back against the “radical,” “woke” forces that have supposedly advanced too far in the Democratic Party in particular and American life in general.
I guess when you’re convinced to be fighting a noble war to defend “real” (read: white Christian patriarchal) America against the insidious forces of leftism and “wokeism,” it all makes perfect sense!
It’s worth reflecting on why so few people on the Right consider these inconsistencies a serious problem, and why they’re evidently not a dealbreaker for most conservatives, neither intellectually nor politically. It’s all about what rightwingers consider the “Higher Truths.”
These Higher Truths to which conservatives subscribe: That “real Americans” are being victimized constantly, made to suffer under the yoke of crazy leftist politics; that woke Libs are out to destroy “real” America; that “We” are entitled to rule, and “They” must be stopped.
This may sound harsh, but I agree with @jasonintrator. Too many commentators thought their expertise on European fascism enabled them to weigh in on Trumpism, not realizing that they actually lacked an adequate understanding of the American (Far) Right, past and present.
One such case is Richard Evans, specifically his essay “Why Trump isn’t a fascist,” published a week after the January 6 attack on the Capitol. newstatesman.com/long-reads/202…
Richard Evans is one of the pre-eminent scholars of Nazism – and arguably one of the best-known historians in the world. I respect him greatly, especially his earlier work that focused on nineteenth-century German social history; the focus on Nazism actually came quite late.
You know what Yascha Mounk conveniently fails to mention? That he also called for an end to “hygiene theater” in May 2021 – that was before Delta, before Omicron. About 350,000 Americans have since died of Covid.
Something to keep in mind when assessing his credibility.
You’d think that including some form of acknowledgment of his previous calls to “end pandemic theater” might be in order? Something like “Mind you, I also proudly proclaimed the exact same thing many months ago, and that was clearly premature”? Some critical self-reflection?
It’s the complete lack of humility that I find astonishing. “I used my significant public platform once before to deride people who remained cautious, including pretty much all the actual experts - they were right, I was wrong, many people died, but hey, no hard feelings, right?”
Aside from the disastrous effects of their “bipartisanship or bust” politics, the fact that the “unity” crowd consistently relies on this kind of bizarrely distorted and utterly stupid version of the nation’s history should really give anyone with a shred of self-respect pause.
“Bipartisanship or bust” is how democracy dies. And actually, if that had been the maxim, America never would have gotten anywhere near democracy territory in the first place.