Jesse Powell Profile picture
Feb 19 11 tweets 3 min read
1/11 We are trapped by our language and limited by our point of reference.

The problem with noun-oriented languages is that labels are indefinite. "You are a man." Period. Forever.

A verb-oriented language might say "You are manning." Right now. Maybe not later.
2/ I can be a runner and I can also be not running right now. Can I be a man and not be manning right now?

Well, how do you define "being a man"? It varies across time and people. Do I prove my identity by drinking beer and fixing cars or is it wearing powdered wigs & tights?
3/ The hard thing about labels, be it political party, religion or gender is that when you accept a label, you allow yourself to be defined by other people. The word is fixed but the definition is fluid. What it means to be a man or woman today is not what it meant 500 years ago.
4/ The other tricky thing is using one word to mean two different things. A "man" can be an adult male human being, and it can also be anyone who chooses to play the stereotypical role--to make the performance--common of an adult male human being, of some select time/society.
5/ We play lots of roles. Sometimes we use costumes to inform or mislead observers. A soldier wears a uniform, a clown wears a red nose, a woman wears a dress. We assume "if he's wearing a soldier's uniform, he must be a soldier" but it's not necessarily true, nor of the woman.
6/ People and norms are constantly evolving. The nouns have failed us.

When someone says "I feel like a man", what is meant is that one identifies with their interpretation of somebody else's stereotypical expectations of an adult male human being. Why is the label so important?
7/ I have not heard anyone in modern times say "I feel like a woman of ancient times, ready to plow the field by day and endlessly bear children by night, to be one of many, the property of a man, at risk of being stoned for speaking." Why do men only now want to play women?
8/ Do I feel like a man? I don't even know what that means, nor is it an interesting question. Do I care what pronouns you use for me? Couldn't care less because my identity, who I see myself as, has nothing to do with my sex organs or your expectations. My identity is intrinsic.
9/ People who are overly concerned with gender, political, religious, national labels seek to put you in a box. Rather than understand you as a person, they'd prefer you tell them what box you go in so they can make assumptions about what they don't know. It's lazy and insulting.
10/ When I think about whether people should post their pronouns, I always think back to these psych studies where the participants are primed at the top of the test by filling out their gender or ethnicity, and then end up performing to their view of societal expectations.
11/11 So, I think there's a non-0 cost of unnecessarily putting yourself in a box for somebody else's benefit. I will take my best guess and if you care that much, you can correct me. I will not ask you for your pronouns and I don't think any company should mandate pronouns. /🧵

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jesse Powell

Jesse Powell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jespow

Sep 8, 2021
1/ Problem with going ahead now is fines/penalties can be astronomical. Will a judge understand the complex issues and side against the government? Will SEC retaliate? Refusal to discuss merits is just more leverage to force a settlement/shutdown.
2/ “We won’t tell you why we think your product is illegal but we will tell you that there is no path to making it legal. Disagree? Go ahead and see what happens.” SEC is not the only regulator playing this game. It’s getting to be more common tactic because it works.
3/ US companies are being hobbled vs competitors because of selective enforcement. Is it protecting consumers? No. They’ll either go offshore to the many unbothered, freely operating alternatives or they will simply lose out on the opportunities offered by crypto.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(