Post

https://twitter.com/SnakePo9/status/1494825598576906245

@MiddleOfMayhem

@TTSAcademy

https://twitter.com/blackvaultcom/status/1154476485014462464

@JChurchRadio

@MiddleOfMayhem

More from @blackvaultcom

John Greenewald, Jr.

@blackvaultcom

May 7

A new, anonymous, person just posted a laundry list of claims relating to AAWSAP, BAASS, Luis Elizondo, and Jay Stratton (and more) on Reddit.

I usually ignore stories like this, but the person added numerous pages from BAASS reports that add some legitimacy to it.

Although this certainly doesn't validate the claims written, the report pages resemble other BAASS reports that have leaked and never really been disputed. Could they be fake? Of course. But it is worth considering.

This anonymous person is likely right that none of this is FOIAable, but it is probably not for the reason you are thinking. They are probably not because these are nothing more than BAASS reports done on their own, and not as a product or requirement for their DIA AAWSAP contract (despite the references to the contract number itself). This has been a long standing point I've made over the years that it was like there was an AAWSAP that was the DIA program, and then a BAASS/AAWSAP that maybe (definitely?) utilized those contract funds, but for a mission/objectives not asked for or sanctioned officially by the DIA (and by "DIA" that should not to be confused with the DIA director of the program who likely decided on his own to go beyond the scope of the official program).

I may add more later, but will let you all read it now. Reddit post in the thread below, followed by the pages. 👇

- REDDIT POST START (UNEDITED) -
I really did not want to write this. However after careful discussion with colleagues, I am going to go with what my gut tells I should do. I cannot sit on the sidelines while I observe the UAP field / narrative get filled with half-truths and obfuscations.

In this post, I will be providing evidence of documents that cannot be FOIA’d. I’ll even give my perspective on Anti-Gravity and the overall landscape of the current UAP field when it comes to intelligence agents that are masquerading as “truthers”. What I speak on is based on my own experiences and observations from being in the field for almost four decades.

I have a degree in electrical engineering from a college somewhere in the South of the USA. I will not say the name of the school because it will be very easy for people inside DoD to track me down if I give away too much considering not many were recruited from the college that I graduated from. I was recruited shortly out of college to work in black operations, specifically on the electrical engineering microelectronics & pulsed power side. These black programs do not necessarily care about your academic credentials as much as they are about two things: Can you think outside of the box, and can you shut the f*ck up about it.

I do not know everything, but the things I am sure of, I will write about here. Why am I doing this now? Because I was given 8 months to live and I will do what I can while alive to try and make a positive impact in the community. I sometimes cannot sleep seeing some of the blatant lies being fed to the community.

Let me put this bluntly before I get into the anti gravity and tech:

Jay Stratton and Lue Elizondo are one of the reasons that various inventors’ ZPE (zero point energy) devices have never seen the light of day. They have been personally responsible for destroying careers, families, and the mental well-being of various physicists and engineers over many decades. Lue used to be a counter intel agent for more than one WUSAP (Waived Unacknowledged Special Access Program) and did NOT get involved in the subject “by chance”. He and Stratton were involved long before the whole AATIP/AAWSAP saga.

Lue is not a bad person at heart, but it makes you wonder WHY he has done what he’s done in order to destroy others. I know many of you may judge this statement and think that I am defending him, but there ARE many good things that he has done in this field as well that many people likely will never know about. With that said, he is definitely compromised in terms of putting USA NAT SEC above all else, and that is a concern at this point. It is a concern because the DoD has long been infiltrated with war-mongers and profiteering cranks that want to keep all of this tech and knowledge silent for the sake of their own self-preservation. I gave him the benefit of the doubt at first, but this is getting to the point of blatant stupidity. To a very small extent, I don’t blame them. However, to hide this from humanity is becoming more of a curse than anything else. People have the right to know.

Jay Stratton, however, is a real scummy person. Don’t get me started on the shit that guy has done to some of my colleagues. I have zero sympathy for that man.

Sean Kirkpatrick is a pawn. He lies through his teeth like Ron Pandolfi has and does. To add, please do not ask me about Jack Sarfatti. He is considered a laughing stock to those involved in various programs.

Also, there are just over 2000 Legacy Programs working on reverse-engineering UAP. Hal Puthoff recently said on Joe Rogan that we have “more than ten” recovered craft in the USA. The number is in the hundreds. At a minimum.

Jeremy Corbell is a useful idiot in many cases. Some of what he releases is accurate, but when he says that us humans “cannot replicate or understand any propulsion systems” that craft use, or whatever nonsense he spews, is a blatant lie. I doubt he actually knows the truth to be fair so I do not believe that he is deliberately lying.

Dave Grusch, Jake Barber, Mike Herrera are the real deal. I respect them and their efforts. Let me say now: please do not ask me about Immaculate Constellation because I know nothing of any of those alleged specified programs. I am an electrical engineer, not a spy. However, being in this field, you pick up tradecraft methods and learn how to ‘run with the wolves’ so to speak.

Human beings, through both novel innovation and also through reverse-engineering (not mutually exclusive), have mastered anti-gravity to a certain degree. When I say “certain degree”, I mean operational craft that can leave our solar system. It sounds nuts, but it is the truth. Some have succeeded by means of pure human ingenuity, and others did it with access to recovered UAP materials. This level of mastery exceeds ANYTHING that even our most traditionally “secret” .MIL programs have. Booze Allen, Honeywell, Lockheed Martin, MITRE Corp, Raytheon, Boeing, etc all have their own versions of various anti gravity technologies. There is a difference between gravitational shielding/repulsion and actually generating HFGW (High Frequency Gravitational Waves).

The pursuit of Tomas Townsend Brown is exactly where people should be looking. Zero Point Energy manipulation has to do with the EM Vector Potential. That is as far as I will go on that.

I was involved in a project that utilized Tesla Turbines, Plasma Toroid chambers, Microwaves, Crystals, extremely strong Rotating Magnets, and various other obtainable components that generated many kilowatts of gravitational waves (or “gravitons” as some call it) in a private BaE Lab. The total cost of the project was just under 3 million USD to build the gravity generator. It can and has been done time and time again, successfully. Gravitational waves are measured electromagnetically due to it being a consequence of the curvature of spacetime itself.

Meta Materials are not needed to generate macroscopic proof of concept gravitational phenomena. Plain and simple.

You will notice in some of the files I am showing that the Soviets coined a term called “rotational gravitation” and believed that rotating masses acted as emitters and receivers of gravitational waves. I am not going to argue with those in the comments that say this isn’t possible, & I’m not going to argue with idiots that don’t know how to think outside of the box. My question is this: If the soviets thought it to be worthy of experimental investigation, then why is that not being done here?!! Oh wait, it is, it’s just going to stay forever classified. FOREVER.

Ask Jay Stratton why he prevented multiple inventors from getting their own laboratory. Because many of the inventors he suppressed focused on rotating capacitors, something the Soviets pursued very quickly. I’m sure his million-dollar book deal helped smooth over all the people he royally f*cked.

My beef is that we are classifying basic science that our adversaries are now discussing in more open forums and in peer-reviewed literature. It’s bullshit. All for what? So that Lockheed can make science breakthroughs proprietary and OWN it?

The closest I have seen anyone in the public domain get close to describing how the technology works is Lt. Col. Tom Bearden, and a few others. The tough part of all this is taking the theory and applying it to a practical experiment. Not many can bridge that divide, but a small, genius chunk of engineers (and some theoretical physicists) have.

You want to know who a REAL, high-level “gatekeeper” of this suff is? Admiral John Micheal “Mike” McConnell. He currently works at Booze Allen, or at least that was the last I had heard of his whereabouts.

I realize now that being given limited time on this planet makes you think about what should REALLY matter. I want the next generation to have a chance.

PS, the Tic Tac is ours (humans). I worked on certain aspects of it personally.
- REDDIT POST END -

Read 6 tweets

John Greenewald, Jr.

@blackvaultcom

Mar 21

🚨 Late last night, new JFK Files totaling 14,321 pages in 161 files were released. I already have these processed, and segmented out for a .zip download, if you need them. Here are some important links (a 🧵): 👇

First, the main archive page on The Black Vault continues to be updated as new documents are released. This holds every known page to have been released over the years pertaining to the assassination, including other FBI files, and records of interest. theblackvault.com/documentarchiv…

Second, the 161 pages released on March 20, 2025, are available for a different download so you can easily determine what is new. NARA erroneously marked them all as being released on March 18 (as of this post) which makes it challenging to see what was new.

Read 9 tweets

John Greenewald, Jr.

@blackvaultcom

Feb 10

🚨 New 🛸 #FOIA. A thread.

Why does NASA want to hide behind a FOIA (b)(5) exemption on what their November 2024 UAP/UFO meeting (briefing) was about, which included NASA's Office of Inspector General? 👇

The meeting was sparked by Peter Meister, on behalf of the Office of the Inspector General.

Mr. Meister is the Senior Science Policy Specialist within NASA's Science Mission Directorate (SMD). 👇

In order to get OIG briefed on UAPs in November 2024, just a few months ago, he reached out to Mark McInerney, the now FORMER NASA Director of UAP Research. 👇

Read 4 tweets

John Greenewald, Jr.

@blackvaultcom

Oct 29, 2024

🧵 In a recent private ticketed event, former DoD counterintelligence agent Luis Elizondo showed this photo of a "UFO" from Romania in 2022.

He called it a "real photo" and references it being described as a "mothership" like the one in Close Encounters of the Third Kind. 👇

I reverse imaged searched it, and eventually turned up a viral post on Facebook in a group called "Mysterious Ancient Discoveries". It got more than 182,000 likes and more than 23,700 comments. It was posted in September 2023.👇

But, it reminded me of something. Years ago, a photo went viral, which although did not look like this, I believe the process it was captured was the same.

Check out this. Through clouds - shot through a window, of a "UFO." It went viral, but the problem, was it wasn't real. 👇

Read 13 tweets

John Greenewald, Jr.

@blackvaultcom

Jun 27, 2024

🧵I feel this new pic is likely another model. But, the question is, what is the connection to the grander story being presented?

A hoax? Misunderstood or miscommunicated images? Maybe I can offer some type of explanation.

But first, here's the clip from last night:👇

This was the photo presented: 👇

I can't help but think this saucer is very similar (admittedly, not an exact match) to the saucers used in the 1956 Sci Fi classic film "Earth Vs. The Flying Saucers." 👇

Read 10 tweets

John Greenewald, Jr.

@blackvaultcom

Jun 22, 2024

🧵WHY IS DOPSR, AND THEIR REVIEWS, IMPORTANT?

Some people ask me why I am so interested in seeing the behind-the-scenes DOPSR review processes as connected to various claims by individuals inside (and outside) the UFO arena, but they are confused on why it's important. Bottom line: it can be revealing to help the public understand many things on many levels about the issues at hand.

So, here's an [admittedly long] thread on why, with verifiable examples.

But first, let me say, when it comes to @LueElizondo and David Grusch, their claims have been entrenched in controversy, regardless of what you believe about them and their claims. I am guessing (hoping?) that we can all at least ALL agree on that. Whether the DoD is lying, or someone else somewhere in the chain is lying to someone else, it's all downright controversial.

So, the DoD's treatment of these individuals, and their products/claims they seek to publish, would be incredibly revealing. And the DoD, along with the DOJ, has held nothing back in the past when it wants something suppressed.

So, this UFO topic, along with those making the claims, would be no different than it is with anything else. There is no "catch 22" if the DoD suppressed something as Grusch has claimed in the past. I've written extensively about that already. If the DoD wants to suppress something, they do, and the public is left in the dark.

Note: If there was information classified needing to be removed… I fully understand if certain portions of the review process cannot be released publicly. However, the fact that there were demands at all would be part of the story, at least in part.

So, here are some verifiable examples of former DoD personnel and top brass, and the problems they faced writing books and publishing their claims:
👇

“The Room Where It Happened,” by John Bolton, received an extraordinary amount of pushback. Bolton was even being sued by the DOJ as connected to it all, but that case was eventually dropped.

This example is well documented. Bolton claimed that the DOPSR review was being manipulated for political reasons. The National Security Council (NSC) reviewer, Ellen Knight, and her subsequent replacement, Michael Ellis, became central figures in the dispute. 👇

"No Easy Day" by Mark Owen [Matt Bissonnette] is an example of what happens when you don't go through the proper DOPSR review process.

The DoD claimed the book contained classified information and pursued legal action against him. As part of the settlement, Bissonnette agreed to forfeit a significant portion of his book's royalties to the U.S. government. While the full review paperwork wasn't publicly released, the legal proceedings and the Pentagon's response provided insight into the issues raised.

Bissonnette published a second book, "No Hero: the Evolution of a Navy SEAL," which did go through the proper channels and sections were redacted. 👇

Read 13 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

John Greenewald, Jr.

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @blackvaultcom

John Greenewald, Jr.

John Greenewald, Jr.

John Greenewald, Jr.

John Greenewald, Jr.

John Greenewald, Jr.

John Greenewald, Jr.

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!