(a 🧵)🚨 "...a story looking at the recent push for disclosure around UAPs..."

This was how the author (I was under the impression there was only one) described the recent WSJ two-part UAP piece. As promised, I waited until Part 2 came out to fully judge, but the final piece is clearly NOT what was pitched. Part 1 was largely unsourced with no real evidence presented, while Part 2 seemed to not be a "Part 2" at all, but dove in to mostly information that's already been published before with the exception of one thing that did interest me, but I'll get to that a different day because I'm not entirely convinced there's truth to it.

In this thread, I will not share any private communication out of respect to the author. Not that there is much to share in that regard (it was all phone calls, primarily), I do try to respect private communications with anyone if I don't explicitly get permission to share. Though I am happy to share 100% of what I sent over, because, well, I wrote it.

My conversations with the WSJ journo took place over numerous days that stretched out over a couple months. I was first approached on January 21st, and I was called numerous times from then over the course of the following few months. I spent, collectively, hours on the phone throughout those calls helping where I could, and saying I couldn't help where I couldn't if I didn't know. In case anyone wonders, and if it isn't obvious, you don't get paid for your time.

Topics included the Luis Elizondo story I've covered for years, the TTSA CRADA (which clearly were both in Part 2), but also the UAP cover-up overall, historical documents, UAP photos, the blanket over-classification of UAP visual imagery, tactics by the DoD to cover-up issues relating to this when using FOIA, AAWSAP, UAP Task Force, NASA UAP briefing material, CIA material often lost and the fact CIA material goes back decades/post Project Blue Book, the work of Travis Taylor in connection to the UAPTF, Jay Stratton with his work in the same, their joining the private industry, the DIA's connection to UAP, the cover-up and lost records at the DIA, Hal Puthoff and James Randi's debunk material found in the CIA archive (it specifically came up), the DoD's "unidentified helicopter" wave through the 1970s, and that was just stuff I sent evidence over of. I was asked numerous other questions on all sorts of things during those phone calls.

My angle has never been pushing the "alien" hypothesis. Rather, I push hard on why the secrecy exists. If you take most of the skeptical angles on UAP, much of the secrecy, to the extent it goes to, and the tactics that we see to cover it up, doesn't make sense. And as most of the world (and mainstream media) focuses on UFOlogy post 2017, the history (with evidence) shows this goes back much father, some of which, remains unexplained. And with the passage of time, the government loses more and more of that history (like the documents just disappear) and after filing 11,000 FOIA requests or so, I can tell you that although lost documents happen, it seems oddly unique to the UAP topic where the more interesting historical UAP records have all been lost from agencies including the CIA, NSA and Air Force.

So, with that in mind that the records I sent over were not trying to push the "alien" narrative, here is a breakdown of the material. Although I understand story angles can change, and the above list of issues is quite long and would require a book to properly cover, what the story was told to me (which is why I spent time helping) was wildly different than what was published. In addition, I found it strange that the document which WSJ made reference to (but didn't publish) seemed to magically appear on the DTIC's website in February of this year, coincidentally, within less than 2 weeks from the WSJ seemingly reaching out to people like me to research their story. A curious coincidence? Maybe. See the attached images for proof of that (images show Part 1 and Part 2 of the TEMPS [Transportable Electromagnetic Pulse Simulator] Final Reports, 1973).

That said, you will find * 100% * of the documentation I sent over in this thread, based on our conversations. The text I included in this thread below is what I sent to the WSJ, in its entirety. Nothing was edited or removed or altered.
The CIA “material” I referenced theblackvault.com/documentarchiv…

🚨The alleged BAASS leaker is back with new images, and some damning allegations.

I won't vouch for the claims themselves, but given their history of posting these documents, it's noteworthy. The images are below, but it should be noted the Tipton/Elizondo email is not new.

A new, anonymous, person just posted a laundry list of claims relating to AAWSAP, BAASS, Luis Elizondo, and Jay Stratton (and more) on Reddit.

I usually ignore stories like this, but the person added numerous pages from BAASS reports that add some legitimacy to it.

Although this certainly doesn't validate the claims written, the report pages resemble other BAASS reports that have leaked and never really been disputed. Could they be fake? Of course. But it is worth considering.

This anonymous person is likely right that none of this is FOIAable, but it is probably not for the reason you are thinking. They are probably not because these are nothing more than BAASS reports done on their own, and not as a product or requirement for their DIA AAWSAP contract (despite the references to the contract number itself). This has been a long standing point I've made over the years that it was like there was an AAWSAP that was the DIA program, and then a BAASS/AAWSAP that maybe (definitely?) utilized those contract funds, but for a mission/objectives not asked for or sanctioned officially by the DIA (and by "DIA" that should not to be confused with the DIA director of the program who likely decided on his own to go beyond the scope of the official program).

I may add more later, but will let you all read it now. Reddit post in the thread below, followed by the pages. 👇 - REDDIT POST START (UNEDITED) -
I really did not want to write this. However after careful discussion with colleagues, I am going to go with what my gut tells I should do. I cannot sit on the sidelines while I observe the UAP field / narrative get filled with half-truths and obfuscations.

In this post, I will be providing evidence of documents that cannot be FOIA’d. I’ll even give my perspective on Anti-Gravity and the overall landscape of the current UAP field when it comes to intelligence agents that are masquerading as “truthers”. What I speak on is based on my own experiences and observations from being in the field for almost four decades.

I have a degree in electrical engineering from a college somewhere in the South of the USA. I will not say the name of the school because it will be very easy for people inside DoD to track me down if I give away too much considering not many were recruited from the college that I graduated from. I was recruited shortly out of college to work in black operations, specifically on the electrical engineering microelectronics & pulsed power side. These black programs do not necessarily care about your academic credentials as much as they are about two things: Can you think outside of the box, and can you shut the f*ck up about it.

I do not know everything, but the things I am sure of, I will write about here. Why am I doing this now? Because I was given 8 months to live and I will do what I can while alive to try and make a positive impact in the community. I sometimes cannot sleep seeing some of the blatant lies being fed to the community.

Let me put this bluntly before I get into the anti gravity and tech:

Jay Stratton and Lue Elizondo are one of the reasons that various inventors’ ZPE (zero point energy) devices have never seen the light of day. They have been personally responsible for destroying careers, families, and the mental well-being of various physicists and engineers over many decades. Lue used to be a counter intel agent for more than one WUSAP (Waived Unacknowledged Special Access Program) and did NOT get involved in the subject “by chance”. He and Stratton were involved long before the whole AATIP/AAWSAP saga.

Lue is not a bad person at heart, but it makes you wonder WHY he has done what he’s done in order to destroy others. I know many of you may judge this statement and think that I am defending him, but there ARE many good things that he has done in this field as well that many people likely will never know about. With that said, he is definitely compromised in terms of putting USA NAT SEC above all else, and that is a concern at this point. It is a concern because the DoD has long been infiltrated with war-mongers and profiteering cranks that want to keep all of this tech and knowledge silent for the sake of their own self-preservation. I gave him the benefit of the doubt at first, but this is getting to the point of blatant stupidity. To a very small extent, I don’t blame them. However, to hide this from humanity is becoming more of a curse than anything else. People have the right to know.

Jay Stratton, however, is a real scummy person. Don’t get me started on the shit that guy has done to some of my colleagues. I have zero sympathy for that man.

Sean Kirkpatrick is a pawn. He lies through his teeth like Ron Pandolfi has and does. To add, please do not ask me about Jack Sarfatti. He is considered a laughing stock to those involved in various programs.

Also, there are just over 2000 Legacy Programs working on reverse-engineering UAP. Hal Puthoff recently said on Joe Rogan that we have “more than ten” recovered craft in the USA. The number is in the hundreds. At a minimum.

Jeremy Corbell is a useful idiot in many cases. Some of what he releases is accurate, but when he says that us humans “cannot replicate or understand any propulsion systems” that craft use, or whatever nonsense he spews, is a blatant lie. I doubt he actually knows the truth to be fair so I do not believe that he is deliberately lying.

Dave Grusch, Jake Barber, Mike Herrera are the real deal. I respect them and their efforts. Let me say now: please do not ask me about Immaculate Constellation because I know nothing of any of those alleged specified programs. I am an electrical engineer, not a spy. However, being in this field, you pick up tradecraft methods and learn how to ‘run with the wolves’ so to speak.

Human beings, through both novel innovation and also through reverse-engineering (not mutually exclusive), have mastered anti-gravity to a certain degree. When I say “certain degree”, I mean operational craft that can leave our solar system. It sounds nuts, but it is the truth. Some have succeeded by means of pure human ingenuity, and others did it with access to recovered UAP materials. This level of mastery exceeds ANYTHING that even our most traditionally “secret” .MIL programs have. Booze Allen, Honeywell, Lockheed Martin, MITRE Corp, Raytheon, Boeing, etc all have their own versions of various anti gravity technologies. There is a difference between gravitational shielding/repulsion and actually generating HFGW (High Frequency Gravitational Waves).

The pursuit of Tomas Townsend Brown is exactly where people should be looking. Zero Point Energy manipulation has to do with the EM Vector Potential. That is as far as I will go on that.

I was involved in a project that utilized Tesla Turbines, Plasma Toroid chambers, Microwaves, Crystals, extremely strong Rotating Magnets, and various other obtainable components that generated many kilowatts of gravitational waves (or “gravitons” as some call it) in a private BaE Lab. The total cost of the project was just under 3 million USD to build the gravity generator. It can and has been done time and time again, successfully. Gravitational waves are measured electromagnetically due to it being a consequence of the curvature of spacetime itself.

Meta Materials are not needed to generate macroscopic proof of concept gravitational phenomena. Plain and simple.

You will notice in some of the files I am showing that the Soviets coined a term called “rotational gravitation” and believed that rotating masses acted as emitters and receivers of gravitational waves. I am not going to argue with those in the comments that say this isn’t possible, & I’m not going to argue with idiots that don’t know how to think outside of the box. My question is this: If the soviets thought it to be worthy of experimental investigation, then why is that not being done here?!! Oh wait, it is, it’s just going to stay forever classified. FOREVER.

Ask Jay Stratton why he prevented multiple inventors from getting their own laboratory. Because many of the inventors he suppressed focused on rotating capacitors, something the Soviets pursued very quickly. I’m sure his million-dollar book deal helped smooth over all the people he royally f*cked.

My beef is that we are classifying basic science that our adversaries are now discussing in more open forums and in peer-reviewed literature. It’s bullshit. All for what? So that Lockheed can make science breakthroughs proprietary and OWN it?

The closest I have seen anyone in the public domain get close to describing how the technology works is Lt. Col. Tom Bearden, and a few others. The tough part of all this is taking the theory and applying it to a practical experiment. Not many can bridge that divide, but a small, genius chunk of engineers (and some theoretical physicists) have.

You want to know who a REAL, high-level “gatekeeper” of this suff is? Admiral John Micheal “Mike” McConnell. He currently works at Booze Allen, or at least that was the last I had heard of his whereabouts.

I realize now that being given limited time on this planet makes you think about what should REALLY matter. I want the next generation to have a chance.

PS, the Tic Tac is ours (humans). I worked on certain aspects of it personally.
- REDDIT POST END -

🚨 Late last night, new JFK Files totaling 14,321 pages in 161 files were released. I already have these processed, and segmented out for a .zip download, if you need them. Here are some important links (a 🧵): 👇 First, the main archive page on The Black Vault continues to be updated as new documents are released. This holds every known page to have been released over the years pertaining to the assassination, including other FBI files, and records of interest. theblackvault.com/documentarchiv…

🚨 New 🛸 #FOIA. A thread.

Why does NASA want to hide behind a FOIA (b)(5) exemption on what their November 2024 UAP/UFO meeting (briefing) was about, which included NASA's Office of Inspector General? 👇
The meeting was sparked by Peter Meister, on behalf of the Office of the Inspector General.

Mr. Meister is the Senior Science Policy Specialist within NASA's Science Mission Directorate (SMD). 👇

🧵 In a recent private ticketed event, former DoD counterintelligence agent Luis Elizondo showed this photo of a "UFO" from Romania in 2022.

He called it a "real photo" and references it being described as a "mothership" like the one in Close Encounters of the Third Kind. 👇 I reverse imaged searched it, and eventually turned up a viral post on Facebook in a group called "Mysterious Ancient Discoveries". It got more than 182,000 likes and more than 23,700 comments. It was posted in September 2023.👇

🧵I feel this new pic is likely another model. But, the question is, what is the connection to the grander story being presented?

A hoax? Misunderstood or miscommunicated images? Maybe I can offer some type of explanation.

But first, here's the clip from last night:👇 This was the photo presented: 👇

🧵WHY IS DOPSR, AND THEIR REVIEWS, IMPORTANT?

Some people ask me why I am so interested in seeing the behind-the-scenes DOPSR review processes as connected to various claims by individuals inside (and outside) the UFO arena, but they are confused on why it's important. Bottom line: it can be revealing to help the public understand many things on many levels about the issues at hand.

So, here's an [admittedly long] thread on why, with verifiable examples.

But first, let me say, when it comes to @LueElizondo and David Grusch, their claims have been entrenched in controversy, regardless of what you believe about them and their claims. I am guessing (hoping?) that we can all at least ALL agree on that. Whether the DoD is lying, or someone else somewhere in the chain is lying to someone else, it's all downright controversial.

So, the DoD's treatment of these individuals, and their products/claims they seek to publish, would be incredibly revealing. And the DoD, along with the DOJ, has held nothing back in the past when it wants something suppressed.

So, this UFO topic, along with those making the claims, would be no different than it is with anything else. There is no "catch 22" if the DoD suppressed something as Grusch has claimed in the past. I've written extensively about that already. If the DoD wants to suppress something, they do, and the public is left in the dark.

Note: If there was information classified needing to be removed… I fully understand if certain portions of the review process cannot be released publicly. However, the fact that there were demands at all would be part of the story, at least in part.

So, here are some verifiable examples of former DoD personnel and top brass, and the problems they faced writing books and publishing their claims:
👇 “The Room Where It Happened,” by John Bolton, received an extraordinary amount of pushback. Bolton was even being sued by the DOJ as connected to it all, but that case was eventually dropped.

This example is well documented. Bolton claimed that the DOPSR review was being manipulated for political reasons. The National Security Council (NSC) reviewer, Ellen Knight, and her subsequent replacement, Michael Ellis, became central figures in the dispute. 👇

The SOL Foundation released video presentations this morning that were from their November 17-18, 2023, symposium.

It includes Karl Nell, David Grusch, Dr. Jacques Vallee, Christopher Mellon, Dr. Avi Loeb, Dr. Garry Nolan and others.

Here is a thread of them all:

🧵🚨New documents unveil Luis Elizondo & Christopher Mellon's push for the Pentagon to clarify Elizondo's role in AATIP.

They also provide insights into the DoD's internal actions on the issue.

A thread: 🔽 2/12 - “Mr. Elizondo had no responsibilities with regard to the AATIP program while he worked in OUSDI, up until the time he resigned effective 10/4/2017," was a statement by Pentagon spokesperson Christopher Sherwood that was published by The Intercept on June 1, 2019. 🔽

1/7: You all want a REAL 🛸UFO/UAP hearing?

THIS would be the one to see:

- DoD Inspector General Robert P. Storch
- Inspector General of the Intelligence Community Thomas A. Monheim
- Secretary of the Air Force Mr. Frank Kendall
- Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin

🔽





2/7:

- Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines
- CIA Director William Burns
- Former DoD Counterintelligence Agent Luis Elizondo
- Former Director of Defense Intelligence for Counterintelligence, Law enforcement and Security, Garry Reid

🔽

1/X - Here are new UFO videos of a "Triangle UAP" around Twentynine Palms, California, published by @g_knapp and @JeremyCorbell.

The information is in Jeremy's tweet below.

(cont)

https://twitter.com/JeremyCorbell/status/1660916145254469635

2/X - It IMMEDIATELY reminded me when I was producing/writing Season 3 of UFO Hunters (with Bill Birnes @billufomag, Pat Uskert and Kevin Cook).

It was a different case, but it took me right back to the HOURS upon HOURS we spent on that show with stuff just like this.

(cont)

1/ The call was interesting. I believe it was an off-camera, but on-record briefing in the Pentagon Briefing Room. Some of us were invited on the phone to take part and listen in. I was in line to ask a question, but sadly, I didn't get called.

Here are some quick thoughts...

https://twitter.com/blackvaultcom/status/1603832560890454017

2/ The opening remarks by Ronald Moultrie and Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick were reminiscent to the UAP hearing opening remarks by Moultrie and Scott Bray.

It seems they consider AARO very much a new effort, and still getting off the ground. However, as I reported a couple weeks...

1/ Bob Lazar "deep dive"?

Ok, you got it.

But, I want to do this one differently.

I want you all to steer me a bit with your beliefs and/or disbeliefs, both pro and con, and I'll see what I come up with.

Here's a thread I want you to take part in if you care about this.⬇️ 2/ First? I tried to contact Bob Lazar. He was "too busy" when the documentary first came out. I am trying again, but zero response as of yet. I will continue to try. I much rather an interview.

Assuming, however, that won't happen, I want you all to participate in the below. ⬇️

1/ If @LueElizondo wants to keep talking about "killing" UFOlogy, at this point, fine. Let him.

Here's the issue with his whole sentiment: He can't do it. Ever. IMHO: Based on his recent actions/words, he doesn't want to "kill" UFOlogy. He wants to make HIS UFOlogy. 2/ Given the recent flaunt of his attorney to me on Twitter for absolutely zero justification that could be given, my guess is HIS UFOlogy would come without the ability to question; it would only be there to believe.

Sit back and take what we say, when we say it, and that's it.

That's the account you admitted to me that you chose to disseminate the private DMs to where you called me "mentally unstable", "huckster" & arguably "fellon" (sic), right? You said it was to "clear [your] name"?

Just curious, because I'd like to avoid confusion & conjecture. ⬇️

https://twitter.com/LueElizondo/status/1565724897736810497

And, @LueElizondo, have you ever taken a step back, and looked at how much "drama" you've either gotten yourself into, or I'll even settle for what you've surrounded yourself with? Admitted sock puppet accounts, random Twitter accounts sharing your DMs on your orders, etc.? ⬇️

1/ @dave_beaty did a great job here. Some are interpreting the below as the video depicting birds, and not UAP.

Though, some have accused Dave of doctoring the video by sharpening, so the process is adding details that really aren't there.

I feel that can be disproven.

https://twitter.com/dave_beaty/status/1530308598743584770

2/ I created a short clip of the section Dave's video appears to show wing flap. I ripped the video from YouTube at highest res available.

I ran NO stabilizer, NO sharpener and NO additional filter. All I did was zoom in & slow down.

Do you see the same thing? (go full screen)

The Black Vault has hundreds of thousands of pages of @FBI files archived on celebrities, authors, journalists, organizations and more.

Here is just a sampling of the recent files added or updated at various archives on the site, all available to download for free: The Finders Cult, practicing "satanic rituals" and involved in child abuse/trafficking:

Download at: theblackvault.com/documentarchiv…

1/ I was going to let this go on longer, but let me clarify to clear up any misunderstanding. The quote was said by Luis Elizondo (@JChurchRadio / Feb 15, '22) and it is a real quote.

I was just curious to see interpretations if a big bad Pentagon spokesperson said it, instead.

https://twitter.com/blackvaultcom/status/1523646506011533312

2/ Although some agree, and others disagree with the original sentiment; it's wrong. There are too many amazing people that have done amazing things that have paved the way for "Post December 2017 UFOlogy" to exist - whatever THAT actually is.

1/ @MailOnline just covered the Garry Reid debacle. In it, @LueElizondo credits his IG complaint for his "ousting".

The DoD would not take action on a complaint, but would on a completed investigation.

Does this mean Elizondo's complaint spawned an investigation & it's done? 2/ If so, where is there any proof of that, that would justify Reid was investigated for UFO related matters, and a conclusion was made, just like in 2020 about the inappropriate relationship allegations?

I think if one report could be released, so could the other. Right?

1/ I am SURPRISED (ok, not really) that the discrepancy of the page count for the classified UAP report given to Congress last year is STILL some big issue.

Let me add some closing (for now) thoughts on the issue until new information, if ever, arrives.

theblackvault.com/documentarchiv… 2/ I like Mr. @LueElizondo, and feel we get along just fine behind the scenes, despite some differences of opinion. You would never guess from some garbage posted on #UFOTwitter by others, but I hope that much is true and he agrees.