How a negative PCR test can serve as a marker for systemic inflammation and spike protein toxicity, creating a widely exploited statistical anomaly to make misleading claims about hospitalization.
I have just written a very extensive piece on what I consider the absolute most important topic of our decade: the core anomaly in COVID data that is exploited worldwide to claim the vaccines are protecting against hospitalization among those who get COVID...
... yet which is at complete odds with the CDC data showing the majority of people hospitalized for COVID-like illness are vaccinated and that the vast majority of them test negative.
While the clinical fate of PCR-negative COVID-like illness is completely unclear, we cannot just ignore it.
Zooming out to capture it, the "Hospitalization Paradox" refers to the fact that the vaccines do not protect against total COVID-like illness at all. When the vaccines have high efficacy against a negative test, all they do is make ill people test negative.
In contexts where they have sub-par efficacy against a negative test — the Johnson and Johnson trial, after 3 months of being vaccinated with no booster, and in the face of increasingly vaccine-resistant variants like delta and omicron —
suddenly they appear to have efficacy against hospitalization, but only among vaccinated people who test positive. The vaccinated people who test negative, by contrast, wind up in the hospital with PCR-negative COVID-like illness.
In this very extensively documented article, I argue that this can be explained by the negative test, during the waning phase,
becoming a marker of vaccine-induced systemic inflammation and the persistence of spike protein in the body, contributing to acute and cumulative spike protein toxicity and possibly spike-induced autoimmunity.
My entry into Substack is, I hope, a symbol of speaking out on these scientific topics in a calm, dispassionate, and helpful manner, serving as a public intellectual during these difficult times.
Hence, I have named my Substack, "The Analytical Calm in the Eye of the COVID Data Storm."
Please share, like, and comment on Substack. It will help the algorithm.
But most importantly, please read this article. This anomaly in the data is critical to understand, and we need to create a broad-based movement to discuss it and demand answers to it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The natural spike is a direct toxin that, with no virus needed, fragments mitochondria, damages lungs, and causes C symptoms in rodents.
The injected spike was modified in diverse ways to make it evade the human innate immune system, stay in the body for much longer, and be produced at extremely high rates.
One of these modifications — the dramatic enrichment of guanosine — may make the mRNA itself, through numerous coherently proposed plausible mechanisms that haven’t yet been tested…
The vaccine spike protein is radically different from the natural spike protein, in ways that are likely to cause major differences in 3-dimensional structure, with emphasis on G-quadruplex formations.
By substituting G and C for other nucleotides (and this all apart from substituting pseudouridine for all the U) to make "synonymous" codons (produce the same amino acid, even though this is not the same and can be the difference between health and disease)...
The GC content of Pfizer is 53%, of Moderna is 61%, while natural is only 36%.
Apart from natural only making it inside your body in severe disease rather than being guaranteed by the injection, this makes the spike produced at orders of magnitude higher quantity...
What's the best observational data (preferably prospective; test-negative case control studies absolutely do not count) that COVID vaccines reduce COVID hospitalizations MORE than they reduce total COVID incidence?
The pooled data in this meta-analysis don't look good at all.
87% against infection, 89% against hospitalization, virtually identical.
So far all the meta-analyses on pubmed seem to just have RCTs. The only RCT that vaguely supports this idea is the J&J trial, which itself is rather weird as it had almost no mild cases. Moderna is conceivably hiding a small difference due to underpowering.
The burden of evidence for any institution’s claim is on the institution.
The burden of skepticism is on the public.
It is the public’s civic duty to be skeptical of any institutional claim, as this is the only enforcing power held against the institution.
For example, if all the governments of the world tell us the mortality rate of COVID-19 hospitalizations but do not tell us the mortality rate of the 79% of hospitalizations for total COVID-like illness that test negative for COVID, we have a civic duty to distrust them.
We have a civic duty to assume they are hiding this with malicious intent and to treat them as such.
Why? Because they can reverse this perception instantaneously by revealing the data.
Absolutely stunning watching @AmeshAA spend practically 10-20 minutes trying to explain how getting a vaccine on the CDC schedule triggers a liability shield without ever admitting the liability shield exists.
It comes up twice during his segment, and he basically bends over backwards to explain how the vaccine court is a special court that incentivizes companies to make vaccines, without actually admitting they cannot be sued for damages.
He lists all kinds of supposed benefits of the vaccine court like access to experts and streamlining, as if experts can’t testify in regular court. He won’t just come out and say the difference is the taxpayers pay for it instead of the companies.
Now that conspiracy theorists have single-handedly taken down Perry’s NYS concentration camp bill, through spreading entirely correct “misinformation” online and through engaging in intellectually honest and highly adept conspiracy theorizing,
we now know that honest conspiracy theorizing is an extremely effective and honorable means of political action.
We must now take down our next target!
The CDC “green zones” or “shielding approach” is an open discussion of the implementation of C-word concentration camps in the United States.