New data updates today in the #UrgencyOfNormal toolkit! I'll go into detail here on the updates to (1) better quantify how vaccines address COVID risk for older adults, and (2) delve into what vaccination rates in children really mean (and don't mean). 🧵urgencyofnormal.com
The slide on vaccine protection for those >65 yrs now shows absolute risk levels, rather than just % vaccine efficacy, and compares COVID risk levels to the flu for this age group.
From CDC data, peak flu hospitalization rates in the >65 year old age group range from ~10-50 per 100k per week. The six most recent pre-pandemic years are shown here. gis.cdc.gov/GRASP/Fluview/…
If unvaccinated, Omicron hospitalization rate in >65s was far higher than flu (>400 per 100k). With 3x vaccination, though, it becomes flu-like (27.5) Vaccinating and boosting the elderly has high payoff for individual and public health.
Jan 8th was just shy of the Omicron hospitalization peak, as you can see here, so the final peak will be slightly higher but still clearly in the realm of flu for the 3x vaxxed. covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tra…
Also, note the COVID data above are not corrected to remove hospitalizations in which COVID was not actually the cause of hospitalization, so is likely a substantial overestimate.
We added this new slide on pediatric vaccination rates because some places are citing low rates in this age group to justify keeping them under various restrictions. These arguments suffer from two major flaws.
First, vaccination rates alone do not account for immunity derived from prior COVID infection, which is at least as effective as vaccination in preventing severe COVID, as shown in the CDC graph on the slide.
The CDC estimates that as of Dec 2021, 45% of children had already recovered from COVID infection, and thus have immunity. So if local vaccination rates in the 5-11 year old age group are, for example, 30%, the total immunity rate is more like 70%. covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tra…
Linking normalcy to kids' to vaccination rates, when we know they vastly underestimate the true immune protection those kids have, is nonsensical.
Second, Omicron transmits efficiently in both vaxxed and unvaxxed people. The vaccines are amazing for prevention of severe disease, but cannot stop transmission. We adults must take responsibility to protect ourselves, not place burdensome and ineffective measures on children.
The data continues to support the case for #UrgencyOfNormal. I hope these updates are helpful to you and to your communities in reclaiming the profound value of living normally.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
CDC reports another study that fails to control for vaccination rate differences between mask-wearers (higher vax rate) and non-mask wearers (lower). Vaccines were highly protective vs infection (pre-Omicron), so of course the mask group has lower rates. The vaccines work.🧵
Using proper control groups is critical, and the most basic principle of good study design. If you don't control for obvious confounding variables (vaccination rate) that will impact the result, you can't assign the effect to the variable you're testing (masks).
Like many other studies, this one lacks a well-matched control group and instead "adjusts" the raw data after the fact, for multiple uncontrolled variables, to generate the numbers reported as the take-home message. These adjustments inject researcher assumptions into the data
Kids desperately need normal life back. To support everyone trying to understand the overall best for them right now, we've created this Advocacy Toolkit. It boils down the data on vaccines, Omicron, and mental health to advocate for kids as whole people. urgencyofnormal.com
The toolkit is an independent collaboration of diverse voices from the medical community. Its origins came from partnering with our own children's schools to help them make sense of the data and make wise choices.
Although there are many articles written about COVID, there wasn't one simple place that integrates and balances all the critical data needed for parents, students, teachers, and mentors to make the decisions they're facing right now. This toolkit was created to meet that need.
The truth about masking children is starting to hit the front page: we never had evidence that it's helpful, and the harms are obvious. 🧵bbc.com/news/health-59…
There are clear negative educational impacts of masking, with the main benefit being making students "feel safe." Alternatively, we could make them feel safe by telling them that the children have always been low-risk and the vaccines work.
Getting lots of questions on what it means for truly highly vulnerable folks if COVID will eventually infect us all. If that's you, please read this thread.
1: talk to your doctor about your medical conditions + find out how much risk you truly face. I've spoken with many people who think their risk is much higher than it actually is. Hard to gauge risk with all the scary headlines. You may be safer than you think
2: Get fully vaccinated. Wear N95s: don't count on other people's flimsy paper mask to protect you- they do very little, N95s work great. Test early if you get symptoms, and get treatment quick. Paxlovid and Sotrovimab active vs Omicron. You're not powerless. Take heart.
Our disagreements on COVID are now rarely about science; they're differences in values. As such, it's important for scientific experts to recognize that we are not moral experts. Our opinions of what costs and tradeoffs are justified are not more valid than anyone else's. 🧵
People differ in the amount of risk we're willing to accept as part of living. Not because some are paranoid or others are reckless (labels for those we disagree with), but because we have different value systems around risk, and most of all, who gets to make those choices.
Scientists' job is to give people accurate information about what the facts are, because that's where we actually do have expertise. But it gets awfully murky beyond that.
@TracyBethHoeg in Congress today speaking up for our kids. Her statement has everything you need to know about COVID and kids, all in one place. The "abundance of caution" approach did an abundance of harm. We can learn and do better. docs.house.gov/meetings/IF/IF… 🧵
"Recent data from Public Health England (PHE, 2021) also found that unvaccinated children have a decreased risk of hospitalization when compared with fully vaccinated 40–49 year-olds (3.4/100,000 vs 3.6/100,000 during this 2-week study period)"
"COVID-19 should also be put in the context of other risks. COVID-19 has a lower annual mortality risk to children than motor vehicle accidents, influenza (by this estimate) and, perhaps most importantly for the 5-14 year olds, suicide (Leonhardt, 2021)."