Too few laymen understand that software development is a knowledge discovery process. Furthermore, its processes are meta-processes that involve the management of symbolic complexity.
These meta-processes can be applied to any human endeavor requiring collective development. The biggest companies in the world are software companies and the reason they are able to scale is that they have organizational processes superior to any other company.
Therefore, these companies are intrinsically knowledge discovery behemoths at scale. They can sustain their growth because of their existing processes and the constant influx of new talent.
To be honest, if I was involved in another technical field and not immersed in software development, I doubt I would understand advanced software development processes. There was a long time in software where agile development seems like woo to so many in the field.
Advanced software development practices will appear as woo to even people who just graduated with a computer science degree. The management of complexity is rarely taught at the undergraduate level.
But what is even worse is that complexity science is rarely ever taught anywhere. It's not taught in the most applicable fields, that is, in the social and biological sciences. This is perhaps because students in these fields lack the mathematical maturity to grasp the concepts.
Thus we are left with a society of people in the social and biological sciences that do not (1) know the meta-processes for knowledge discovery and (2) are unaware of complexity science. It is no surprise that we have failed miserably in mitigating the risk of the pandemic.
We have government structures that were invented in the 1700s to address the concerns of agricultural society. Only through patches was governments modified to address a mercantile economy.
What is obviously absent is a government structure that is in tune with the complexities that emerge from a knowledge-based economy. Most governments have been flying blind for decades and will continue to do so until there's a big reset.
A reset is creative destruction. Unfortunately, creative destruction can be a very painful process. All we can ask for is that we install processes that can reduce the pain.
Unfortunately, just as we have bungled the pandemic response (due to exponential viral growth), we will continue to bungle civilization transformation (due to exponential technological growth). Like the pandemic, we will find the least informed and least adaptive suffer the most.
The reason is that our governments do not have the processes for rapid knowledge discovery. They are structured only to address the slow pace of agricultural development. They are not adequate for the task at hand.
The damn problem with the COVID19 virus is that it keeps changing! Simple minds think the changing explanations are an indicator of a conspiracy theory without realizing that the virus is outsmarting them.
It's just stunning how something that isn't really alive can hijack people's minds. Isn't it enough that they can hijack people's bodies? Now we have governors signing laws to accelerate its spread.
Children who mingle in schools are the main vector for this virus's spread. The US Surgeon General got it through his kid. If you want to accelerate the deaths of grandparents, you spread the virus through their grandchildren.
Americans are a very odd lot. You have a deadly weapon, that is purportedly manufactured by a known enemy, yet many have become a catalyst for the spread of this deadly weapon. In political jargon, they call these 'useful idiots'. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_id…
I could be talking about the covid19 virus or anti-democratic Russian tactics, which would apply to the same set of Americans. There is something odd here where so many find it to be their duty to work against their own interests.
It's also interesting that the pandemic is still at its peak in Russia. So perhaps to understand a useful idiot, we have to understand how people in Russia tick. Why is it that Russia is so backward as a nation?
It's difficult to understand how the Russian army can occupy Ukraine which is the size of Texas. It's next to impossible to do if the population (44m) isn't on your side. One would need to enlist a sizeable number of accomplices within the population.
Certainly, if the permafrost is hard enough, the tanks can move unimpeded, but logistics win wars. The problem with good logistics is that it doesn't come for free, it's expensive.
Anyway, none of this makes sense. I don't see the Russians moving tanks into Ukraine when the temperature is around 40F. That's a muddy quagmire! Also, tanks aren't as effective inside urban places.
Did anyone notice that sustained nuclear fusion is a good analogy to achieve unlimited human potential? To tame the unlimited energy of a nuclear fusion one needs a magnetic bottle that is adaptive enough to constrain the reactor from destroying itself.
Doesn't this remind you of dystopian movies like "Fahrenheit 451", "The Giver", "Equilibrium" and "V for Vendetta" where art and emotion are removed from society so that humans avoid their own destructive fate?
In each of these movies, the antagonist are institutions that are so rigid in their micromanagement of lives that we've what it means to be human. Do we not also see it in ourselves when we are rigid in our own thinking that we've lost our emotions and thus our humanity?
Let's not forget that FaceBook began by pandering to exclusivity (i.e. owning an email address in a prestigious university). All economics requires scarcity, exclusivity is a kind of scarcity that exists in a world of abundance.
Many don't recognize the two sides of decentralized ledger technology (i.e. blockchain). On one side is the idea that exclusive control of the network is prevented. On the flip side, the network makes possible human notions of scarcity in a virtual world of abundance.
The alignment chart that has its origins in Dungeons and Dragons has a fascinating choice of just two dimensions that comprehensively shape a characters' behavior. theatlantic.com/technology/arc…
'A “good” moral alignment means a character will lean toward altruism and personal sacrifice. Evil means harming and oppressing. A neutral person is one who wouldn’t kill somebody for no reason, but wouldn’t protect anybody for no reason either.'
'lawfulness,“implies honor, trustworthiness, obedience to authority, and reliability. On the downside, lawfulness can include closed-mindedness, reactionary adherence to tradition, judgmentalness, and a lack of adaptability.'