Borrell's address at #MSC2022 titled: "what to do when Russia and China try to re-define terms"

Russ-China statement Feb 4 "is an act of defiance. It is clear: revisionist manifesto. A manifesto to review the world order."

eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/h…
"Re-defining democracy is a major plank in their revisionist drive. They talk about ‘genuine democracy’. Adding qualifying adjectives reminds us of Soviet times when communist regimes were talking of ‘people’s democracy’ or “organic democracies” in Franco’s Spain."
"Democracy, they say, should be implemented ‘to suit national conditions’. We're told ‘China and Russia, as major countries with long-standing history & culture, have profound traditions of democracy rooted in thousands of years of experience of development.’
"This isn't a semantic discussion but a political one. We see every day how in multilateral orgs there's a battle about universality of human rights. Authoritarian powers – not just Russia and China – seek to relativise notion of individual rights"
"Russia and China are the ones who want to go back, to the 19C, the fight of empires. And Russia and China becoming more and more assertive, willing to restore the old empires that they have been in the past. We move forward with the 21C- with the lessons we learned in the 20C"
"In conclusion, the UN and the wider multilateral system has two legs: the fundamental equality of states plus recognition of their sovereignty and the pursuit of common goals with the recognition of the rights of all human beings."
"If you take second leg away, and you only have a look at the first one, you are only left with state sovereignty. And that would mean taking away the progress we made in the last 75 yrs. That’s why we must resist this Russian-Chinese revisionist drive to re-define the terms"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Finbarr Bermingham

Finbarr Bermingham Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fbermingham

Feb 22
I asked Borrell and Le Drian whether Chinese backing for Russia would damage its relations with Europe.

They had a chuckle together, then Le Drian said:

"There was this rapprochement regarding the votes at the UN SC, however there was also a trip for Putin to Beijing...
"...and I am sure they spoke about Ukraine. However, in their common statement there was no reference to Ukraine, so perhaps it's China that is appreciating this situation..."
That's it - nothing from Borrell, but I guess this means that because Ukraine wasn't mentioned in the Russia-China communique, France thinks it is not relevant (?)
Read 4 tweets
Feb 22
Beijing has released more detail on Wang Yi's call with Blinken, during which it says the US "briefed on the situation in Ukraine".

"Wang Yi said China is concerned about the evolution of the situation in Ukraine. China's position on the Ukraine issue is consistent."
"The legitimate security concerns of any country should be respected, and the purposes and principles of the UN Charter should be upheld. The evolution of the Ukraine issue so far is closely related to the delay in the effective implementation of the new Minsk agreement."
China will continue to make contact with all parties based on the merits of the matter. The situation in Ukraine is getting worse. China once again calls on all parties to exercise restraint, recognise the importance of implementing the principle of indivisibility of security..."
Read 5 tweets
Feb 18
NEW!

The EU has launched a new WTO case vs China, second within a month

This time it's about IP.

EU says Beijing is using domestic courts to undermine global IP laws and allowing Huawei, Xiaomi and other tech giants to secure cut-price licences.

scmp.com/news/china/dip…
Request for consultations lodged with China today over use of "anti-suit injunctions” to prevent international firms from suing Chinese counterparts in foreign courts for use of tech without licences or permission.
Firms that have made complaints – including Sharp, Ericsson and Nokia – have been threatened with daily fines of €130,000 or criminal charges, meaning executives could be jailed in China for non-compliance, according to the EU.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 18
UK Trade Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan to travel to Indonesia, Japan & Singapore to "oversee launch of final phase of negotiations" to join the CPTPP, UK government press release says.

Cleared first round of accession process.
There has also been plenty of chatter this week about China making preparations to join the CPTPP

While Taiwan’s application to join the CPTPP was expected to be discussed by the bloc’s secretariat this week, five months after it was submitted.

scmp.com/news/china/dip…
Read 4 tweets
Feb 16
NEW: The World Bank has been accused of “funding a campaign of repression” of Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in Xinjiang

New report details almost half a billion dollars lent to companies with deep links to forced labour and other rights abuses

scmp.com/news/china/dip…
Report published by Atlantic Council details lending as recently as 2020 to 4 Chinese companies who "directly participated in":

• state-sponsored forced labor programs,
• compulsory land expropriation,
• programs that require minoritized citizens to take oaths to the CCP
The World Bank's International Finance Corporation is one development finance institute with links to Xinjiang.

Others include Asian Development Bank, European Investment Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Dutch and German state-owned DFIs
Read 12 tweets
Feb 16
A really interesting look at what Chinese experts think re Ukraine by my colleague Amber Wang.

Echoes much of the thinking I've heard in Europe this week, where most experts / officials think China does not want war, cos it's bad for business...

scmp.com/news/china/dip…
Zhang Tuosheng, military researcher, says it would make US relationship "more difficult" and "China-EU relations would also be very troublesome... as they're all watching what stance China will take.”

China would "pay the price of a war" because of the effects on global economy
Respected state council adviser @ Renmin Uni Shi Yinhong said war would mean" the US will have to reduce its attention and resources to China in the Indo-Pacific"

But war would "radicalise world politics and "doom" China to an arms race.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(