This idea seems to have some connection to the wyvern's serpent-like nature and to the serpent in the Garden of Eden.
(BnF, Français 15213 f.63v)
The wyvern (or sometimes the viper or serpent, depending on the bestiary) is like the Serpent in the Garden, unable to approach the pure Adam and only able to come close once Adam has Fallen (and realized his nudity).
(BnF, Français 1444 f.258)
Look how happy this one is to see a fully dressed person.
(Morgan Library, MS M.459 fol. 5r)
"No, I don't to be hugged, you ridiculous nudist!"
(BnF, Latin 2843E f.70v)
Sometimes this is applied to totally unrelated animals, like this big cat-thing (probably a Woutre) that seems terrified of a naked man.
(Arsenal, 3516 f.200v)
Basically, medieval wyverns are perpetually afraid that there's a naked person nearby.
(BnF, Français 412 f.229v)
"There.....there's a nudist colony behind me right now, isn't there?"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why are we not talking about Sir William Neville & Sir John Clanvowe, the two gay English knights buried together in a tomb with marriage motifs???
Who were friends with Chaucer and possibly the inspiration for his The Knight's Tale?
And also maybe SPIES? #MedievalTwitter
So the above image is the tombstone of Sir William Neville & Sir John Clanvowe, who died in Galata (outside Constantinople) in 1391 within days of each other. Their shields are "impaled"; that is, their coats of arms are merged. This really only happens with married couples.
The article about their tombstone tries SO hard not to say gay.
I want to highlight an example of the whitewashing & erasure of the work of scholars of color--particularly Black & Indigenous ones--in the work of white medievalists. I came across it yesterday, & it's such a clear demonstration of how their work gets credited to white people.
This isn't a critique of the article's claim or its contribution to the field of race studies in Old English.
This is about how white medievalists who start publishing on medieval race draw on the work of scholars of color while obscuring them.
So this article came out recently in PMLA, a journal that has notably blocked work on race by premodernists of colors (medium.com/the-sundial-ac…)
That matters, since this article will be highly visible and cited in a way that the work of scholars of color won't.
🧵: So several scholars of color are pointing out the problems with racists mad about the new LoTR series. I did the same. My tweet got tepid responses, while the scholars of color faced vicious racism immediately *often from the same people*
[CW: racism, misogyny, homophobia, transphobia]
Most the people disagreeing with me didn't make it an issue of my identity & didn't insult me. These are among the meanest ones.
Easily a third of the responses to the scholars of color were hateful.
Dr. Ramírez got six comments on his main tweet and two of those were immediately vicious insults.
🧵The AHA president's "scholarship on race is ahistorical and presentist" blog isn't an outlier view or a brave take in the face of "the woke mob" or the "radical Left". It's been the party line among many senior scholars for decades.
Take medieval studies. (Really. Take it).
Look at basically any "state of the field" forum in medieval studies from the last few decades, especially in Old English studies. A lot of the big names--Allen Frantzen springs to mind--made careers out of slamming new approaches as presentist and ahistorical.
Here's Frantzen in 1990, complaining about "revisionists" (who he calls "Professors of Otherness") rewriting the teaching of history.