Canada's Parliament to vote today on Emergency Act: a first opportunity to end the emergency if MPs so wish. Trudeau says he'll regard vote as a confidence measure - meaning that if he loses, his government will resign and an election will be called.
Trudeau's party lacks a majority in Canadian federal House of Commons, so he'll need cross-partisan support to a) uphold the emergency and b) stay in office.
Even if MPs vote with Trudeau this time, they can still vote to void any individual emergency measure if they want.
If Parliament does approve the emergency and does vote confidence in Trudeau's government, Trudeau next must organize a special committee of MPs and senators to review his actions.
The courts will also review government actions under Canada's Charter of Rights
The emergency will automatically expire within 30 days unless Parliament affirmatively votes to extend.
Once the emergency does terminate, an independent inquiry will review the government's actions and report to Parliament on how the government used its temporary powers.
When the elder Trudeau invoked emergency powers in 1970 to combat a terrorist cell in Quebec, public opinion backed him at first. But perceived abuses of power swung opinion against him, and his party suffered serious losses in the next federal election of 1972.
Polls suggest that Canadian public opinion is closely divided on Trudeau's emergency actions. He's got a small majority behind him for now - but probably only for now. Say what you will about *him.* Canadian democracy and Canadian freedom remain secure, robust, and lively.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2) Isn't it kind of worrying that a major corporate figure would be gullible enough to rely on a tweet from the @TPostMillennial as an information source?
Anyway, have you driven a Ford lately?
Apparently, Ford offers the largest and best network of electric charging stations in North America. ford.com/powertrains/ba…
1) Canada's Parliament can end emergency any time by vote. Trudeau does not have a majority in Parliament, cannot control it.
Failing that ...
2) Emergency automatically ends in 30 days unless affirmatively extended by Parliament.
In meantime ...
3) A standing committee of Parliament reviews every emergency act of government in real time.
And also
4) By law, an inquiry must be held into use of emergency powers - with report to Parliament due no later than 360 days after emergency end.
As well ...
5) Any act of government under emergency law is reviewable by courts under Canadian charter of rights.
Also to consider
6) The present emergency law was enacted by a Conservative government precisely to set limits to the emergency powers used by the elder Trudeau in 1970
Anyway, for all those who have spent the day trawling through my tweets, looking for the place where I compared Trump to Hitler ... because I must have done that, right, or else a troll would have to think for a minute and thinking only hurts the troll head ...
... here is what I have said over and over and over again on the subject of Hitler analogies, one more time, and with feeling:
"There are many stops on the train line of bad before you get to Hitler station."
These are highly specific, closely tailored emergency measures. Towing illegally parked vehicles is not exactly the first step on the road to totalitarian night ...
As I read it, there are new financial *reporting* provisions, but no new financial *restrictions*. Since the people doing the truck-protest crowdfunding seem so far to be keeping most of the money for themselves, it's not clear that the protesters would notice any cut-off anyway
Correction to the above: financial institutions will be directed to temporarily freeze accounts suspected of supporting illegal activity without a court order. That is a bigger deal.
Hints for those commenting on invocation of Canada's emergency legislation:
1) This law was passed relatively recently, 1988. It is explicitly subordinate to Canada's charter of rights. It replaced the much more draconian emergency laws that were invoked in 1914, 1939, and 1970
2) The legislation allows for a *range* of actions by authorities, proportionate to the civil disturbance. Proportionately is the thing that the courts will probably examine most closely when they review any actions taken.
3) It's not "fascist" for an elected government to invoke duly enacted emergency laws, reviewable by courts, to deal with disturbances. What is a lot more fascist-y, on the other hand, are extremist groups who blockade commerce in hopes of coercing the state to yield to demands