People think California’s water scarcity is natural but it’s actually the result of opposition by Malthusian “environmentalists” @SierraClub @NRDC et al. who have blocked water recycling, storage, & desalination projects for decades calmatters.org/commentary/202…
Reactors could be added to our Diablo Canyon nuclear plant to desalinate gigantic quantities of water. Indeed, that was the original plan.
Instead, Gov. @GavinNewsom intends to close the plant 40 years prematurely, in 2024-25. At a time of blackouts.
We should build the 4 new reactors to create electricity, hydrogen, and fresh water
California’s power sector emissions are at least two-and-a-half times higher today than they would have been had the state kept open and built planned nuclear plants
The dean of California political journalists is @DanCALmatters
In 2017 he alerted me to the fact that the Brown family benefitted from shutting down & preventing the building of nuclear plants. They had a monopoly on low-sulfur oil, which at the time was burned for electricity
On taking power in 1975, Brown and his allies aggressively wielded power in ways that directly benefited Brown’s family, which included killing nuclear power plants.
It also benefitted the Getty oil family who the dad of @GavinNewsom worked for
Advocates of government-run drug use sites say they will reduce surrounding drug use, dealing, and violence, but San Francisco's experiment shows the opposite, with a homicide, OD death of 16 year-old girl, and the shooting of neighborhood ambassador occurring since its opening
Defenders of @LondonBreed say we just need to give the supervised drug use site time to work, but the open air drug dealing and drug use around the UN Plaza, where the fentanyl & meth smoking lounge is located, has only gotten worse.
"When someone is openly using drugs on the street we're going to give them the option of... treatment... But if they refuse, we're not going to allow them to continue using on the street."
San Francisco’s District Attorney @chesaboudin claims “Most of the residents that I speak with aren't particularly upset that there are drug sales happening” in their neighborhood.
This a gross & gigantic lie — even for a guy who lied his way into office
Boudin says, “The drug sales themselves are in many ways a symptom of a larger problem”
YES.
The larger problem is that Boudin is using a sanctuary law, designed to protect refugees, to protect the Mexican drug cartels making billions from killing 100,000 Americans a year.
“But he said he prosecutes about 85 percent of the felony drug cases the police bring to his office, a rate that has risen steadily over the past two years”
Grossly misleading. Boudin plea bargains them away. Dealers fake rehab before returning to the streets & killing more kids
It is hard to find a city in America whose residents say they care about black lives more than San Francisco. Two weeks after Donald Trump was elected president in 2016, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors affirmed in a resolution that “Black Lives Matter.”
In response to a police officer killing George Floyd in 2020, more than 1,000 San Franciscans marched under the banner of “Black Lives Matter.” And, later that same year, San Francisco Mayor London Breed promised to defund the police and spend the money saved on black lives.
People last week accused me of violating the privacy of a homeless addict named Korey, who I interviewed as he smoked fentanyl & meth
But thanks to that video, an outreach worker tracked down his sister, Keneda. She hadn't seen him for two years
I brought her to him yesterday
People rightly worry about the privacy and dignity of homeless drug addicts, but many tell me they feel invisible and *want* to share their stories. They often express gratitude afterwards.
Here's the first video with Korey that upset so many people
My critics are struggling with how to attack me. At first they said I never actually interview any homeless people, and just don't want to look at them. Then, after I shared video interviews, my critics said I was exploiting the homeless, and violating their privacy. Which is it?
“Prosecutors in Sacramento, California filed charges in the killing of a woman whose partly nude body was found hanging from a tree in a homeless encampment after she was kidnapped & raped”
No sane psychiatrist believes that enabling & subsidizing people with schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety disorders to use fentanyl & meth is good medicine. Yet that is what San Francisco & other liberal cities are doing.
What California does with its 100,000 unsheltered residents, most suffering mental illness or drug addiction while living in violent, dangerous and degrading encampments, is mistreatment of the foulest sort.
The question used to be: do you reward people for not committing crimes, or do you punish them when they do? But that’s been superseded by a question from progressives: what if it’s a form of victimization to try to influence people’s behavior at all?