Why you are full of crap: 1. Oh, great, you also accused Myanmar of apartheid. So you are comparing Israel with a country that engaged in mass rapes and genocide. AND NO ONE ELSE. Not every Uighurs. Not Darfuris. You are comparing Jews with the worst abusers ever. Drop dead.
2. You have OBSESSED over Israel. You spent untold time and money just to attack travel companies who don't discriminate against Jews in Judea and Samaria. Your priorities are all screwed up,@amnesty, and it happens to be against Jews. There's a word for that.
@amnesty 3. Remember your Gaza Platform? it's still there today. It was based on complete garbage input. I showed scores of photos of terrorists that you called "civilian" or even CHILDREN. I pointed it out. You never corrected it. Still online today. You KNOWINGLY lie about Israel.
I've been reading up on what distinguishes colonialism from anything that the Muslims have ever done. In the end, it is that the people defining it want to exclude anyone not white or Jewish.
For example, "modern colonialism" is defined to start in the 15th century....
1/
which is when the Portuguese expanded into Africa followed by the Spanish and the New World.
But the bulk of the Ottoman Empire growth happened after 1500 as well.
2/
And they expanded into Africa as well!
So then the definers say, no, colonialism is when the native labor and resources are exploited. But the Ottomans levied on taxes - specifically for non-Muslims. It was still an economic gain for them at the expense of the colonized.
3/
So 500 employees of @Amazon and @Google want to end a $1.2b contract with Israel. Let's talk about this.
1/
@amazon@Google Even they admit that Google has contracts with governments and entities they don't like.
Yet...no letter to the Guardian about those deals.
Hmmm. Wonder why not. 2/
@amazon@Google In fact, the petitionrs don't even mention huge Google deals with Saudi Arabia, or its re-entry into the China market after publicly leaving.
I just re-looked at @HRW's argument that Israel is guilty of apartheid, and I discovered how Human Rights Watch purposefully twists international law. I'll post the details Sunday, but here is the gist of it.
1/
@hrw All the major laws (Apartheid Convention, Rome Statute) that define apartheid use the words "domination by one racial group over any other racial group." HRW needs to expand that nto "national" group to apply to Palestinians. (Calling Jews a race is not a good look.)
2/
@hrw So @HRW points to a different convention for its definition. The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) says “racial discrimination” as "based on race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin."
3/
Here is an adorable girl in Gaza who is attending a school that teaches hate.
She doesn't hate Jews now. But in a few years she will be indoctrinated to want to give birth to martyrs.
This tweet seems to have hit a nerve among the haters.
Good.
They know it is true and therefore are responding with "whataboutery" - or justification for hate..
Her school had an assembly on Saturday claiming that the 1969 fire at Al Aqsa (by a deranged Australian Christian) was the first step by Jews to destroy the mosque. Pure incitement to hate Jews. facebook.com/permalink.php?…