Thread by @delaneykingrox

Anyone else care to review these statements? I cannot find the article other than on pubmed, and he has not cited his sources.

https://twitter.com/delaneykingrox/status/1496337632359751685

It is one thing to say "loads of studies" but which ones?

I could pay twenty five bucks on pub med, but if this was published in a peer reviewed journal I should be able to access it there. Right?

No linky?

And I find it strange that the author himself said of effects on the cisgender athelete Caster Semenya

"was not strong enough to warrant the potential health implications that taking hormone suppressers could cause."

And casually ignore these "health implications" when...

...looking at transgender women who had taken said hormone suppressants.

Seems rather biased doesn't it?

What harmful effects and how would they affect performance?

And where did you get that information.

Let's see the numbers and the studies. Let's review this.

So we are looking at transgender women who have "been through male puberty" right?

Okay what about transgender athletes who haven't thanks to puberty blockers?

Surely if the argument is about differences in puberty, then puberty blocked trans athletes should be allowed, right?

Great. So let us look at those stats. What is our sample size? How many transgender women athletes with and without male puberty are in the data being analysed?

How many are there? Hmm?