I think we're still only just beginning to understand the ripple effects of Peak Office on downtown economies, the geography of labor, and the future of work
1/ First, the data.
Stadiums are packed. Travel is back. Restaurant reservations are surging. But office occupancy is moribund.
Even movie theaters—a business sometimes written off as “doomed”—have recovered almost twice as much as offices.
2/ What was once a hot take is now a stone-cold reality: The office is never coming all the way back.
Stanford economist @I_Am_NickBloom put it bluntly: “The number of person-days in the office is never going back to pre-pandemic average—ever."
3/ My Peak Office thesis is this:
Most ppl aren't remote right now. But the demise of the full-time office will be like a canon-ball dropped in a lake—an acute phenomenon whose ripples will touch the whole economy.
EG: NY subway projects pre-COVID ridership will recover...never
4/ Like all phenomena, Peak Office is unevenly distributed.
Occupancy rates in Houston, Austin, and Dallas have substantially and consistently outpaced those of coastal cities like New York and San Francisco.
5/ The most surprising and significant ricochet effect of Peak Office?
I think it could be the de facto death of the five day work week.
6/ Research from @I_Am_NickBloom has found that knowledge workers strongly prefer to move away from a full-time five-day office-week. That's why almost all companies now are pitching hybrid.
7/ Bloom told me that he’s also seeing signs of remote-work envy from people who can’t do their jobs from home.
Hospital workers, eg, are saying: "Wait, if none of my consultant friends work 5 days in an office, I want a shorter in-person workweek, too!"
8/ If the five-day in-person workweek is decaying for knowledge workers right now, it's not hard to imagine it spreading—into health care, into higher ed, into primary schools ... and at that point, you've got something very much like the death of the five-day work week.
9/ Thanks for reading. If you want more on the future of work and material progress, subscribe to my free newsletter "Work in Progress" here —>
NEW POD: @wolfejosh and I talked about
- the tech stock meltdown
- the "what sucks?" theory of innovation history
- why tech breakthrus often begin w/ tools for the disabled
- "wise mind" & dialectical behavioral therapy
- 4 theories for seeing the future
- @wolfejosh's 4 frames for seeing the present & predicting the future
1. The "What Sucks?" Theory of Innovation
"Every entrepreneur that has ever started anything looks around and says, "Huh, that sucks. There's got to be a better way." Step 1: Venting. Step 2: Inventing
2. "Science Fiction —> Science Fact"
Our capacity to invent the future is a function of our capacity to imagine it. Science fiction inspires people to create what doesn’t yet exist.
The group with the highest level of personal satisfaction: weekly religious-service attendants.
This group leans Republican.
The group with the lowest level of national satisfaction? Republicans.
interpretations:
1. life is "hate congress, like your congressman" all the way down 2. ppl are resilient, but judgey: so the personal satisfaction line is straight but the nat'l satisfaction line is jagged 3. news is a VR where everything is always bad, even when life is okay
The U.S. has the world's most expensive medical school education and a deliberate policy to constrict residency spots. No wonder we have fewer physicians/capita than every country in Europe.
A conspiracy to limit the number of primary care physicians in America, maximize their debt, and raise prices for consumers would look practically identical to existing U.S. medical education policy.
One of the most popular modes of commentary is what you could call DGAF Populist.
DGAF Populists—Rogan, Chappelle, Maher—are anti-PC, anti-GOP, anti-left, anti-neurotic, anti-"woke," pro-"do your thing," economically left, culturally libertarian, and linguistically rude (1/x)
You can point to a thousand differences between Rogan, Chapelle, & Maher but just bear with me on this commonality of style.
The popularity of the DGAF Populist style is really important, because of how it intersects with media economics and media coverage. (2/x)
Aggregator economics push firms like Netflix & Spotify to buy exclusive rights to popular content in a world where a lot of culture is political, where politico-culture analysis is popular, and where DFAF-P is often the most popular flavor (3/x)
This week, Denmark led the world in infections per capita. It also suddenly voted to end all restrictions—no mask mandate, no COVID passports. I talked to researcher and govt adviser @M_B_Petersen about why.
When I say Denmark leads the world in COVID cases per capita, I mean, literally—if you don't count the South Pacific archipelago of Palau—it's number one in cases per million people.
But the relationship between cases and ICU admits has been shattered.
There's no mystery here.
Denmark broke the tether between cases and severe outcomes bc it's one of the most vaccinated countries in the world.
- 81% of adults are doubly vaxxed
- 61% have booster shots
Denmark's booster-shots-per-capita is about 2.5X higher than the U.S.
School rewards people who learn and use big words. But the real superpower is the ability to use simple language to decode important and complicated ideas. Beware the illusion that "complexity = intelligence."