(🔐) MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: New Revelations Indicate Ginni Thomas Was Key Author of Trump’s January 6 Coup Plot
This is an explosive but extremely well-sourced report. I hope you’ll subscribe to PROOF, RETWEET this news widely, and follow the thread below. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
1/ As regular PROOF readers know, PROOF articles are both long and deliberately slow burns; they build a journalistic case through numerous sources and links and callbacks to significant past reporting. This article is no exception—some of its most explosive components come late.
2/ The most significant work the article does, and I consider this only the tip of a very large iceberg, is it dispels the false notion that *either* Peter Navarro *or* John Eastman were the authors of what is now known as Trump's coup plot: the vile, seditious "Green Bay Sweep."
3/ All the evidence we have confirms the core concepts behind the "Green Bay Sweep" originated from two secretive far-right orgs run by—you guessed it—Ginni Thomas. Trump's legal ops, as to both lawyers *and* so-called "experts," was staffed by Thomas's friends and subordinates.
4/ But this *isn't* an article that merely positions Ginni Thomas as leading the January 6 effort from a lofty perch—though at times it's clear she did so, and that her lofty perch included unprecedented direct access to the President of the United States across a 2-year period.
5/ Ginni Thomas, this article reveals in extensive detail, was a leader of the January 6 scheme in a *literal* and *on-the-ground* fashion, directly intervening to form the coalition that made the chaos of January 6 possible. Indeed, the evidence now suggests that Ginni Thomas...
6/ ...may have been *more* involved in January 6 than any other plotter. How? As a key figure in more *spheres* than *anyone* I've encountered thus far:
🟥 White House
🟧 Trump Legal
🟨 Team Kraken
🟩 Women for America First
🟦 Groundswell
🟪 CNP Action
🟫 Congressional Outreach
7/ Even that's not all, as unlike any other plotter Ginni Thomas had an in-road to two other components of the "Green Bay Sweep":
⬛️ The Supreme Court
⬜️ The White House Personnel Office
It can rightly be said that Ginni Thomas *shaped* the government that sought a self-coup...
8/ ...on the front end, and then on the *back end* had unprecedented access to the thinking of the man that a key CNP member has called the "real Chief Justice [of the United States]" and Mitch McConnell has dubbed the "north star" of the MAGA GOP and one of its key "leaders."
9/ I have now spent well over a year writing nearly 200 articles—all of them long and exhaustively sourced—about the January 6 insurrection. And I can find no figure more connected to every component of the event than Ginni Thomas. Yet Congress and the FBI won't go near her. Why?
10/ Name a person involved in the coup plotting and they're likely tied to Ginni Thomas—who'd be at the *center* of the web of coup-plotter interrelationships if one were to draw one. Steve Bannon. Ali Alexander. Cleta Mitchell. John Eastman. Barbara Ledeen. Russell Ramsland, Jr.
11/ The list goes on and on. Trump. John McEntee. Don Berlin. Rich Higgins. Mark Meadows. It is—as I said—hard to find *any* sphere inside the January 6 investigation that Ginni Thomas wouldn't be one of the *first* people you'd want to talk to about.
But that's not surprising.
12/ It's not surprising because Ginni Thomas has been a radical on a self-described "mission" for decades—and ethics of any kind have never been a block on her advances. Which is why the other thing this article does is present a portrait of Thomas that's accurate and horrifying.
CONCLUSION/ Ginni Thomas is still involved in the insurrection, just less publicly. This article ends with an interaction between Thomas and the camp of a likely 2024 GOP POTUS candidate—DeSantis—that'll scare you. She's dangerous, and must be subpoenaed/interrogated immediately.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(🧵) THREAD: There’s no purpose in debating Trump supporters on Venezuela. They lack the background to participate in a coherent conversation. Do they know Trump is backing a socialist despot over a capitalist who won the 2024 election by 34 points? No.
It gets worse from there.
1/ People without principles, like MAGAs, desperately alight on random anecdotes to try to “prove” points—as they don’t know how to *actually* prove a point, make an argument, hold a consistent position, marshal evidence, or maintain logical throughlines across diverse scenarios.
2/ So for instance, they’ll tell you that the justness of what Trump did is “proven” by how some Venezuelans reacted to it. But these are the same folks whose political ideology has long been grounded in denying international law and the sovereignty or interests of other nations.
As detailed in 2020 bestseller Proof of Corruption, Trump used Erik Prince, Rudy Giuliani and a megadonor to launch clandestine negotiations in Venezuela that would've effectuated some version of the deal. America is being lied to every which way.
What the NYT-bestselling Proof Series has shown—across 2,500 pages and over 15,000 reliable major media citations from around the world—is that what we think of as many different scandals is *one* scandal: the Trump-Russia Scandal. Ukraine, Israel, KSA, Venezuela... even Epstein.
The Trump-Russia Scandal, as a research topic, is so vast—it covers so many continents, decades, and scandals in various nations—that we can analogize being a scholar of it to being a scholar of the Cold War or the Gilded Age.
We keep speaking of trees without seeing the forest.
So blowing up the dead body of the man Trump deliriously claims stole the 2020 presidential election from him was part of a *law enforcement operation* targeting an entirely different leader? Pull the other leg now. en.apa.az/america/us-str…
It was almost exactly six years ago that Trump told us he thirsted to destroy key foreign cultural sites just to desecrate them and was told in reply—unambiguously—that this was a war crime.
Corporate media appears to be under-reporting or not reporting the mausoleum strike—a media victory for Trump because it at once hides a war crime, hides a fact that debunks Trump’s claims of this being a law enforcement op, and hides a key Venezuelan justification for vengeance.
This anodyne BS is how the NYT summarizes the most corrupt presidency in US history.
Trump said he didn't know what Project 2025 was; he lied.
He said he would get prices down; he lied.
He said he'd only deport criminals; he lied.
He started wars and attacked his own people.
He destroyed the White House. He took bribes. He pardoned monsters. He grifted taxpayers and investors out of billions. He covered up pedophilia. He committed war crimes. He enabled genocide. He savaged federal agencies. He engaged in stochastic terrorism. He simped for the rich.
He cut off student loan forgiveness. He did special business favors for the CCP. He destroyed small farms. His tariffs constituted the largest tax increase on Americans in decades. He told thousands of lies in public. He hid major medical issues. He spread racist disinformation.
UPDATE: CNN confirms that "the envelope [holding the Epstein-Nassar Note] was sent from the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City [where Epstein was being held] to Nassar"—*and* got vetted by federal officials.
Which explains the Virginia postmark (where the FBI is).
So (1) Why won’t the FBI release the 2020 handwriting analysis it did, if that analysis concluded the note was a forgery? (2) How did the FBI preclude the possibility—even *likelihood*—of dictation in 120 minutes? (3) Where’s the *real* Epstein-Nassar note we *know* Epstein sent?
On a separate but related note, I'm astonished at how many folks I thought smart bought the Trump FBI/DOJ explanation instantly—despite none of it making sense.
You realize these are just Trump personal lawyers with no ethics or fear of repercussions, right?
Trump posted this without knowing Nick Reiner was under arrest. He posted it assuming one of his fans murdered Rob Reiner. So if you want to know how Trump will react if fans start murdering his enemies, now you know. He'll celebrate and blame the victims.
Those claiming Trump knew he was commenting on a family dispute are not reading the confirmed, universally reported on post above. Trump makes very clear *his* understanding at the time he composed his post—which may have been last night—was that Rob was killed over his politics.
The post above is far more dangerous, disgusting, and diabolical than anyone is yet realizing. This isn't just Donald Trump pissing on the grave of a critic, it's him signaling that those who do violence in his name are justified because they were—definitionally—provoked into it.