(🔐) MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: New Revelations Indicate Ginni Thomas Was Key Author of Trump’s January 6 Coup Plot
This is an explosive but extremely well-sourced report. I hope you’ll subscribe to PROOF, RETWEET this news widely, and follow the thread below. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
1/ As regular PROOF readers know, PROOF articles are both long and deliberately slow burns; they build a journalistic case through numerous sources and links and callbacks to significant past reporting. This article is no exception—some of its most explosive components come late.
2/ The most significant work the article does, and I consider this only the tip of a very large iceberg, is it dispels the false notion that *either* Peter Navarro *or* John Eastman were the authors of what is now known as Trump's coup plot: the vile, seditious "Green Bay Sweep."
3/ All the evidence we have confirms the core concepts behind the "Green Bay Sweep" originated from two secretive far-right orgs run by—you guessed it—Ginni Thomas. Trump's legal ops, as to both lawyers *and* so-called "experts," was staffed by Thomas's friends and subordinates.
4/ But this *isn't* an article that merely positions Ginni Thomas as leading the January 6 effort from a lofty perch—though at times it's clear she did so, and that her lofty perch included unprecedented direct access to the President of the United States across a 2-year period.
5/ Ginni Thomas, this article reveals in extensive detail, was a leader of the January 6 scheme in a *literal* and *on-the-ground* fashion, directly intervening to form the coalition that made the chaos of January 6 possible. Indeed, the evidence now suggests that Ginni Thomas...
6/ ...may have been *more* involved in January 6 than any other plotter. How? As a key figure in more *spheres* than *anyone* I've encountered thus far:
🟥 White House
🟧 Trump Legal
🟨 Team Kraken
🟩 Women for America First
🟦 Groundswell
🟪 CNP Action
🟫 Congressional Outreach
7/ Even that's not all, as unlike any other plotter Ginni Thomas had an in-road to two other components of the "Green Bay Sweep":
⬛️ The Supreme Court
⬜️ The White House Personnel Office
It can rightly be said that Ginni Thomas *shaped* the government that sought a self-coup...
8/ ...on the front end, and then on the *back end* had unprecedented access to the thinking of the man that a key CNP member has called the "real Chief Justice [of the United States]" and Mitch McConnell has dubbed the "north star" of the MAGA GOP and one of its key "leaders."
9/ I have now spent well over a year writing nearly 200 articles—all of them long and exhaustively sourced—about the January 6 insurrection. And I can find no figure more connected to every component of the event than Ginni Thomas. Yet Congress and the FBI won't go near her. Why?
10/ Name a person involved in the coup plotting and they're likely tied to Ginni Thomas—who'd be at the *center* of the web of coup-plotter interrelationships if one were to draw one. Steve Bannon. Ali Alexander. Cleta Mitchell. John Eastman. Barbara Ledeen. Russell Ramsland, Jr.
11/ The list goes on and on. Trump. John McEntee. Don Berlin. Rich Higgins. Mark Meadows. It is—as I said—hard to find *any* sphere inside the January 6 investigation that Ginni Thomas wouldn't be one of the *first* people you'd want to talk to about.
But that's not surprising.
12/ It's not surprising because Ginni Thomas has been a radical on a self-described "mission" for decades—and ethics of any kind have never been a block on her advances. Which is why the other thing this article does is present a portrait of Thomas that's accurate and horrifying.
CONCLUSION/ Ginni Thomas is still involved in the insurrection, just less publicly. This article ends with an interaction between Thomas and the camp of a likely 2024 GOP POTUS candidate—DeSantis—that'll scare you. She's dangerous, and must be subpoenaed/interrogated immediately.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING: We now have a good idea of why Trump rushed to contact PBPD—one of the first to do so—when he learned Epstein was under investigation in 2007.
It was a CYA. Per his friend Lutnick, it was believed Epstein had blackmail on men he'd hung out with. usatoday.com/story/news/pol…
Trump knew Epstein was angry over the 2003 money-laundering deal Trump did with a Putin agent—stealing the property from Epstein—and knew Trump then dimed him out anonymously in 2003.
Trump figured if he got to PBPD fast, they'd think any videos of him Epstein offered were fake.
This maneuver by Trump is so old and so obvious that it's literally the focal point of perhaps the most famous scene in the most famous movie ever made.
The best part?
Trump flubbed his lines, telling PBPD that "everyone" knew what Epstein was doing.
(🚨) MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: Trump Personal Lawyers Bondi, Blanche, and Patel Hid From American Voters a *Minimum* of *95%* of All References to Donald Trump in the Epstein Files (950,000 of 1M+), Establishing the Largest Political Coverup in American History axios.com/2026/02/10/tru…
As a Trump biographer/presidential hisrorian who has written a book on Trump and Epstein establishing that the two operated distinct but mutually beneficial—sometimes interconnected—trafficking operations, I took guff for estimating Trump would appear in the Files 50,000+ times.
Critics said there was no way that was possible. So I want to do here what I know those critics won't and apologize. I low-balled how entwined Trump was with Epstein to a degree that is almost numerically difficult to express. They were even more joined at the hip than I thought.
Imagine being a 42 year-old pleading with a known pedophilic sex criminal to fly you to his island so you can party with girls he assures you will be 25 or younger.
Then imagine lying about it to hundreds of millions. Even after your lies are caught.
You don't hate Elon enough.
Instead of saying—as honor demands—"I made horrible mistakes for which there's no excuse, I'll take time away from public life to reflect on them," he's kept lying, attacked media, tried to distract, and obscenely said he worked harder than Epstein's victims to get the Files out.
Now imagine that this happens during the same 12-month period this man gleefully—without having any idea what he was doing, or even *caring* if he had any idea—cut a massive foreign aid program whose erasure is projected to cause *more than 10 million deaths* in the years ahead.
This major report on the Greg Bovino-to-Tom Homan handover in Minneapolis at once reveals that the Trump regime hasn’t changed its plans for ICE *and* serves as a primer on the many aspects of the criminal justice system Homan lied about today.
It can't be sufficiently emphasized that the Trump regime has at all points lied about every aspect of its immigration agenda, every aspect of how immigration enforcement works and every aspect of the justice system that touches upon immigration enforcement.
It's all a long con.
No one is saying that every American must understand the justice system.
That would be ideal, but it's impractical.
The problem is that our justice system lies at the center of our politics—which means ignorance about how it works is ripe for abuse by an authoritarian regime.
I shouldn't even have to say this, but precisely *no one* in the independent journalism sphere is saying that Trump can *legally* cancel the midterms.
So corporate media should put on its thinking cap and ask themselves what independent journalists *are* saying.
Yes.... *that*.
It's Month 1 of a 10-month plan and they're already illegally invading countries, illegally occupying U.S. cities, posting Nazi memes from government accounts almost daily, and publicly saying there should be no elections anymore. You think their plan is to do *anything* legally?
So I've no idea why corporate media keeps sanctimoniously reminding us of something we already know—that Trump can't *legally* cancel elections. Because that's not where the debate or mystery is now. The question is whether he thinks he can wait until 2028 to declare martial law.
The question media should be asking: if Minneapolis only needs 600 police officers to perform all general law enforcement activities in the city, why did Trump send 3,000 federal agents to execute a statutorily and constitutionally *much* smaller task?
Answer? He wanted a *war*.
Based on the size of the task and authority ICE actually has—merely executing judicial warrants for already-identified undocumented persons—we'd expect an ICE "surge" in Minneapolis to be about 100 agents.
Trump sent *30 times that*.
Because he wants to declare an insurrection.
So if you're an American paying only small attention to Minneapolis and wondering why things are crazy there, imagine *your* town being the target of an *unprecedented* federal op.
Big deal, right?
Now imagine the feds sending *30 times* too many men—most *virtually untrained*.