(🔐) MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: New Revelations Indicate Ginni Thomas Was Key Author of Trump’s January 6 Coup Plot
This is an explosive but extremely well-sourced report. I hope you’ll subscribe to PROOF, RETWEET this news widely, and follow the thread below. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
1/ As regular PROOF readers know, PROOF articles are both long and deliberately slow burns; they build a journalistic case through numerous sources and links and callbacks to significant past reporting. This article is no exception—some of its most explosive components come late.
2/ The most significant work the article does, and I consider this only the tip of a very large iceberg, is it dispels the false notion that *either* Peter Navarro *or* John Eastman were the authors of what is now known as Trump's coup plot: the vile, seditious "Green Bay Sweep."
3/ All the evidence we have confirms the core concepts behind the "Green Bay Sweep" originated from two secretive far-right orgs run by—you guessed it—Ginni Thomas. Trump's legal ops, as to both lawyers *and* so-called "experts," was staffed by Thomas's friends and subordinates.
4/ But this *isn't* an article that merely positions Ginni Thomas as leading the January 6 effort from a lofty perch—though at times it's clear she did so, and that her lofty perch included unprecedented direct access to the President of the United States across a 2-year period.
5/ Ginni Thomas, this article reveals in extensive detail, was a leader of the January 6 scheme in a *literal* and *on-the-ground* fashion, directly intervening to form the coalition that made the chaos of January 6 possible. Indeed, the evidence now suggests that Ginni Thomas...
6/ ...may have been *more* involved in January 6 than any other plotter. How? As a key figure in more *spheres* than *anyone* I've encountered thus far:
🟥 White House
🟧 Trump Legal
🟨 Team Kraken
🟩 Women for America First
🟦 Groundswell
🟪 CNP Action
🟫 Congressional Outreach
7/ Even that's not all, as unlike any other plotter Ginni Thomas had an in-road to two other components of the "Green Bay Sweep":
⬛️ The Supreme Court
⬜️ The White House Personnel Office
It can rightly be said that Ginni Thomas *shaped* the government that sought a self-coup...
8/ ...on the front end, and then on the *back end* had unprecedented access to the thinking of the man that a key CNP member has called the "real Chief Justice [of the United States]" and Mitch McConnell has dubbed the "north star" of the MAGA GOP and one of its key "leaders."
9/ I have now spent well over a year writing nearly 200 articles—all of them long and exhaustively sourced—about the January 6 insurrection. And I can find no figure more connected to every component of the event than Ginni Thomas. Yet Congress and the FBI won't go near her. Why?
10/ Name a person involved in the coup plotting and they're likely tied to Ginni Thomas—who'd be at the *center* of the web of coup-plotter interrelationships if one were to draw one. Steve Bannon. Ali Alexander. Cleta Mitchell. John Eastman. Barbara Ledeen. Russell Ramsland, Jr.
11/ The list goes on and on. Trump. John McEntee. Don Berlin. Rich Higgins. Mark Meadows. It is—as I said—hard to find *any* sphere inside the January 6 investigation that Ginni Thomas wouldn't be one of the *first* people you'd want to talk to about.
But that's not surprising.
12/ It's not surprising because Ginni Thomas has been a radical on a self-described "mission" for decades—and ethics of any kind have never been a block on her advances. Which is why the other thing this article does is present a portrait of Thomas that's accurate and horrifying.
CONCLUSION/ Ginni Thomas is still involved in the insurrection, just less publicly. This article ends with an interaction between Thomas and the camp of a likely 2024 GOP POTUS candidate—DeSantis—that'll scare you. She's dangerous, and must be subpoenaed/interrogated immediately.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(1 of 2) This is inaccurate—and the truth is worse. She was already detained, and when Trump's pal heard that he contacted the White House to demanded she be deported so he'd get custody of their child. The White House complied.
I don't know what to call that, but it's criminal.
(2 of 2) But wait, it gets worse! The Trump pal demanding Trump execute a government action for his benefit has evidence on Trump's past sex crimes—which means that this situation reeks of both Bribery and Extortion.
The former is impeachable *and* criminal, the latter criminal.
MORE: Here's the full story. I know it means nothing to say this anymore, but just this one situation—as it apparently involves felonies, impeachable offenses, ripping a mother from her child, and the covering up of sex crimes—is a Watergate-level scandal. nytimes.com/2026/03/20/us/…
It looks like we have to go over this YET AGAIN for all the corporate media journalists in the back: Markwayne Mullin was selected by Trump—as are ALL Trump peons—on the basis of him having no scruples and being willing to do as he's told.
EVERYTHING he's saying today is a lie.
America has gone through this dance too many times to go through it again. Stephen Miller and others craft narratives for nominees to deliver to Congress if they think those nominations are uncertain. The narratives have nothing to do with what the nominees are tasked with doing.
They can play this game because they know that corporate media in this era has decided to act as a stenographer for whatever any liars say rather than providing any context or counterweight whatsoever.
Everything Mullin is saying is contrary to everything we know his boss plans.
I do think to myself, sometimes, as an agnostic, that if there weren't only a God but a highly engaged and attentive God as evangelicals believe, that God would have in some celestial way far beyond our understanding struck down this piece of shit harder than any human in history
There's a level of hypocrisy only humans notice, then there's a level of hypocrisy so galactically astounding I think the absence of celestial retribution in the face of it may be the strongest argument yet that God doesn't exist
I remain unsure, but this tries my doubt *sorely*
What people misunderstand about Donald Trump is that they think either he believed what he was saying in 2008 or that he believes what he is saying in 2026, when of course the reality is that he was lying both times and has never in his whole miserable life believed in *anything*
(🧵) BREAKING NEWS THREAD: Those who've been reading PROOF OF DEVILRY—the largest exposé of the Trump-Epstein Scandal—are cheering today. Congressional questioning confirms my reporting that one way Epstein helped interfere in the 2016 election was illegal campaign contributions.
1/ As PROOF OF DEVILRY reported, these payments were part of an effort—involving everyone from Michael Cohen to MBS (of Saudi Arabia) and Marc Kasowitz to David Pecker of the National Enquirer—to pay off Trump women. mediaite.com/media/news/bom…
2/ These criminals believed—correctly—that Trump couldn't be elected otherwise. The effort was domestic and international and constituted a criminal conspiracy involving election fraud, illegal donations, tax fraud and illegal foreign election interference. Trump was aware of it.
There's no reason for Iran to attack NATO nation Turkey—but a drone did. Iran denies sending it.
There's no reason for Iran to attack a UK base in Cyprus—but a drone did. Iran denies sending it.
Now Azerbaijan has been attacked. Iran denies involvement.
I think this is Israel.
I say this for a reason. Right after the illegal invasion, US media reported that America and Israel had reverse-engineered the Shahed drone and had essentially identical copies of it. Evidence suggests these suspicious strikes are coming from Lebanon—where the IDF is positioned.
The Iranian defense strategy isn't opaque—it's transparent. It's firing at Israel and nations that host *American* bases. What's wholly inconsistent with that is the idea that it would attempt to bring the full force of NATO against it by firing on Turkey and a UK base in Cyprus.
You'll see a lot of bad analysis claiming Trump's third illegal attack on Iran is merely an attempt to distract from scandals at home.
PROOF will shortly publish a book-length report establishing that the current war with Iran is not disconnected from the Trump-Epstein Scandal.
Fully unpacking this will take the coming PROOF report, but as a preview I will say that planning for the current war—and a switch to focusing on destroying Iranian ballistic missiles and ending its government—began at the same time Trump and Kushner set their plan to *own* Gaza.
I published a bestseller in 2019 informing America that Trump and Kushner would be taking America to war with Iran. It's simply taken slightly longer than expected. But what the interim has enabled is an understanding of how Epstein is relevant to these plans Trump had all along.