EBL Profile picture
Feb 24 19 tweets 4 min read
Arsenal beat Wolves last time out but they were lucky despite Arteta's top tactics. Arsenal were passive and weak mentally on & off the ball due to their inexperience within a hostile environment, but the Emirates is a difficult ball game.

I expect a dominant showing.

THREAD! Image
On paper, Arsenal should dominate the game against Wolves, but they should have done the same at Molineux & didn't. Pressing wise, Arteta adapted his press perfectly to nullify Wolves' build-up, but the players didn't reliably exert that press due to technical insecurity. Image
In possession, Wolves didn't even press high and Arsenal still couldn't build play successfully. It was such an immature and poor overall display. However, that type of performance is to be expected. It's such a young group and it's their first year playing together at this level
However, at the Emirates, the likelihood of Arsenal succumbing to the pressure of a difficult atmosphere like the one at Molineux is far less. The crowd will be behind them and it'll be easier for them to be assertive and harder for Wolves to be aggressive.
Mentally, it's difficult to go to any away ground and press or keep the ball, let alone at the Emirates. However, Wolves did it at Old Trafford because they have quality, but Arsenal are a different tactical beast when compared to United. It won't be as easy as it was that day.
Wolves had an overload in the build-up against United's lacklustre pressing structure so they used their technical quality and numerical advantage to stamp their authority on the game. They won't have that tactical advantage against Arsenal, and Arteta's men are more intense too.
So, when considering that Wolves don't have home advantage, are matched up in the build-up pressing wise, and don't even press high, Arsenal *should* dominate proceedings with the ball. They're an immature & inconsistent bunch, but the logic at hand points toward Arsenal control.
As such, I think Arsenal will come out & control the game tonight. Yes they're immature, but they have quality & home advantage. It's easier to be aggressive in a game where they're supposed to win - away from home, however, it's easier to be passive like they were at Molineux.
The fans and Arteta won't allow that at the Emirates, however. Arsenal have to be controlling these types of games. The primary theme should be 65% possession to Arsenal and them trying to break down Wolves' low block. Wolves have quality, but their plan is reductionist.
Wolves are a good technical & physical team so will win duels, use their technical quality in the build-up & in settled play, & have moments where they use their outlets to get up the pitch, but they don't press high unless counterpressing. Arsenal subsequently have an advantage.
When Arsenal build play out from the back, they'll do it with little pressure. When Wolves build play out from the back, they'll be under mass pressure because Arsenal press high. They didn't do it successfully at Molineux, but the Emirates is a different ball game as discussed.
Arsenal should be able to sustain attacks and try to control the elements of play that Wolves are good at i.e. nullify their outlets as much as possible, win duels in midfield after long kicks, be aggressive positionally to win the ball high + force them back in settled play.
Again, even in those moments where José Sá kicks it long, Arsenal have a compact midfield structure with aggressive players, so it's all about ensuring that Arsenal are the team that retrieve possession in those moments to keep the ball and/or exploit Wolves in transition.
Wolves will of course have joy there too, but Arsenal have to ensure they dominate that phase of play as much as possible to ensure that they can be as aggressive as possible on & off the ball. If they keep losing midfield duels/fail to deal with outlets, they risk losing control
Then it'll become easier for Wolves to keep the ball in settled play because Arsenal are losing the ball in midfield areas where they have to retreat into a defensive block as opposed to an aggressive one. Teams can't keep pressing high if they lose possession close to their goal
However, despite these warning signs, ARS should pin Wolves back & control proceedings. They have the compactness when pressing & in transition, the physicality to deal with duels, & the technical quality to build play under little pressure. It should be wave after wave of attack
Then, within those moments where Arsenal sustain pressure, they are fantastic creatively. They have elite positional play structure, combinations, and balance in the final third. Martinelli is a loss but Smith-Rowe is a nice interchangable type combiner/threat against low blocks.
Overall, the game is in Arsenal's hands, particularly with home advantage behind them. It'll be easier for them to use the positive energy of the crowd to be brave on and off the ball & control proceeding than it was away against Wolves. I expect Arsenal's best selves to turn up.
If those complaining over the 'lucky' comment in the initial tweet bothered to read the thread they'd understand the context behind it. I am very obviously referring to the general control within the game and not the last 20 minutes where Holding & co defended the box resiliently Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with EBL

EBL Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EBL2017

Feb 25
Liverpool-Chelsea is a phenomenal match-up of two elite heavyweight titans. There is little to separate the teams each time they play, and I expect the same to be the case in Sunday's final at Wembley. Below, in this in-depth thread, I discuss the match-up in detail.

THREAD! Image
On paper, Liverpool's press matches up perfectly with Chelsea's 3-4-3. As such, when pressing high, Liverpool can get success, control, and create within these moments. However, Chelsea's technical quality is elite and their players are in close proximity positionally for passes. Image
As such, there will be mixed moments here. Liverpool can create via pressing, and Chelsea can create via playing through Liverpool's pressing and directly exploiting them in transition or in settled play against their high line like the last fixture between the two sides. Image
Read 19 tweets
Feb 24
It's much easier for a manager who's entering a new club in the middle of a rebuild to enter into a squad without finished stars and players like that (i.e. Arteta with Özil). Klopp's transition to Liverpool was seamless because he had no personalities to contend with.
United's new manager is heading down a similar path. It'll be beneficial for whoever comes in if Pogba leaves because he's the epitome of a big personality who's not good enough. Similar can be said for Ronaldo at this stage in his career. The lower the profiles the better.
Klopp had a clean slate at Liverpool. He was the leader of the pack with no personality issues to contend with. Arteta inherited Arsenal with personality issues so has had to deal with extra noise making his rebuild even harder in terms of building a harmonious squad.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 22
Chelsea are a pressing team but they're pinned back more easily than Liverpool and City are. Their settled pressing from goal kicks is good because the wingbacks push on & press high, but it's hard for them to do that in settled play unless it's a defensive overload on the side.
In settled midfield moments where the ball is central & the play is circulated to the fullback, it's often difficult for Chelsea's wingbacks to push that high up the pitch. If they do, the winger is free & the centre back has to come across, but that's a lot of distance to cover.
Lille have more of the ball away at Stamford Bridge & they're 11th in Ligue 1. It's not a good indication of control for a pressing team. On average, Chelsea have 4.2% less of the ball than Liverpool & nearly 10% less than City - they simply don't press as well as those two.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 22
Another day, another thread..

Let's talk about Diego Simeone's Atleti versus Ralf Rangnick's Manchester United. Both of these teams are flawed, but one has to win.

Below, in this 25+ tweet thread, I discuss why United are favourites *IF* they are resilient mentally.

THREAD!
Atletico's switch to a 5-3-2 block has been the hallmark of Simeone's tactical evolution in the past couple of years. However, the block still resembles a 4-4-2 a lot of the time, and this is because of the way he wants to create defensive overloads to press within his mid-block.
Atletico Madrid are an aggressive team, but passive in style. They allow the opposition to build play out from the back through their central defenders and goalkeeper. This can see them get pushed back into their low 5-3-2 block with relative ease.
Read 28 tweets
Feb 22
The only way Mikel Arteta doesn't win a Premier League or a Champions League at Arsenal Football Club is if something political goes wrong i.e. the board don't provide necessary funds in the future, Edu signs players unsuited to the system (Royal, Neto), etc.

Arsenal are blessed
People forget the trials and tribulations that Arteta has underwent at Arsenal Football Club. The media & fans wanted him out after the defeat at Everton over a year ago AND he had to commit a mass exodus of a toxic squad. His tactics are clear, but his resilience is unwavering.
The tactics have always been clearly amazing, so the only questions that were left since his early days at the club were his ability to deal with pressure, to lead a group, and his talent identification in the market for his system. ALL of the above have been mercilessly queried.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 20
Positional play and "Juego de Posicion" is something that football fans fawn over, and rightly so, but the intricacies within the system that enable beautiful football centre around defensive principles. Xavi, Arteta, & Pep implement the 4-3-3 to an elite standard.

MEGA-THREAD.
Positional play is associated with the 4-3-3 because of the positions the players occupy on the pitch (both half spaces, wings and the centre with the #6, CF and two CB's).

Any coach can line their players up in that shape, but implementing it successfully is the tough part.
The 4-4-2 was a staple of the game for years because it naturally created compactness in midfield with 2 CM's and combinations out wide for target men in the box - not in the 4-3-3, though. The players become further apart centrally and close together on the two flanks.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(