Dr. Mansa Keita Profile picture
Feb 25 4 tweets 1 min read
There are zero actions necessitated by a child adopting a gender or a sexuality.

A parent can accept a child's decision/announcement and still be a parent with full rights
When it comes to trans kids (that's what this really is about), a shell game is at play.

- It's about parent rights when the parents *are not* trans affirming

- It's about child health and psychology when the parents *are* trans affirming.
I think it's all really complicated for trans kids and their parents already. We are mostly just adding political fuel to the fire.

At the end of the day I support trans kids and want them to be as fulfilled and happy as possible, even if I can't tell them the best way.
Oh, regular reminder that I have a near zero tolerance policy for transphobia on my posts.

I block very quickly on this topic.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Mansa Keita

Dr. Mansa Keita Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rasmansa

Feb 22
This was a fun one, and the comments were really good too. So let's do a thread on the position and positional #chess in general.
High level guide to assessing a chess position.

- Material
- King safety
- Piece Activity
- Pawn structure

Stronger players have much deeper understandings of these concepts and sub-factors within, but we all can use these at our own levels.
So in this position:

- White is down in material (1 less pawn).
- Black's king is safer (less access points to it)
- White has a better pawn structure (that pawn on d6 can't be defended by pawns)
- Black has more active and scary pieces (Queen and Bishop near white king) r2r2k1/pp3pbp/3p1np1/1N2p3/...
Read 12 tweets
Feb 14
Police are too quick to break up and use violence against protests about police brutality, racism and Indigenous rights.

Police are too slow to break up protests about Covid mandates.

It's hard not to see the role demographics plays there.
I believe in the right to protest, even if it inconveniences. I also believe that the state has a responsibility to act when it exceeds reasonable limits. Like most cases of civil disobedience, arrests are an expected cost to pay. If no cost, no deterrence.
Individuals who disperse when asked to shouldn't face consequences. Authorities shouldn't escalate with violence (e.g beatings). There's a balance, and the refusal to make it clear that the balance isn't driven by demographics and politics, speaks volumes.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 12
A lot of people who say a lot about how corporations should treat speech, have never held roles of much responsibility within corporations.
Imagine saying corporations shouldn't insist employees uphold the company's values and thinking you're making a good point.

I get people are idealistic, but be a bit realistic too at least.
I regularly see corporate takes on here that make me wonder if people intellectualize too much about things they do not remotely comprehend.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 8
I'd like to remind people that heterodox implies atypical or even fringe.

It tells you nothing about reasonableness or correctness.
"Here's this heterodox black person that has a different opinion about racism than you do" reflects way less on me than some people may think.

Tells me some stuff about the person using the argument though.
Really interesting how Identity Politics and Standpoint Epistemology are embraced by those looking to their favorite black people to help them dismiss racism.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 6
Even today, our kids generally say "the s word" when referring to the word "stupid".

We don't allow them to call anyone that in any sense. They can refer to things that way, but not people.
My wife and I swear, in my case rarely. We almost never swear in the presence of our kids, and when we do they call us out on it.

I'm not making any moral judgment with this, just thinking of how differently even good parents parent.
Derogatory references to people just seem like something we don't want to encourage. If they truly mean to refer to a person under that derogatory term then it's legitimate, but they better be prepared to defend that use or face consequences.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 5
Some argue you must abide offensive speech, because freedom. They also argue you must not use your speech in retaliation, because freedom.
I remain convinced that all sides just want to set their own boundaries on socially acceptable speech, but only one side insists they want to constrain the speech of others in the name of free speech.
There was a time I would argue that side would only socially constrain the speech of others using speech, a tactic I believe to be fair.

But over the last few years, I've realized a tremendous willingness to support the use of state power to constrain speech.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(