Integration into the genome... yet. They need long read Whole genome sequencing to prove that which Im sure is currently underway. Rudi showed it was integrated but was critiqued that it could be an artifact of making sequencing libraries. This paper fills in many questions.
The study was well controlled with RNAse confirmation that the target is in fact DNA and not RT of RNA.
Team "Scientific Censorship" has a lot of explaining to do. Many people on this team were vocal opponents of the CRISPR baby experiments run in China. Now they are guilty of
Advocating such experiments on a billion people. It is amazing how pliable their ethics are with a pinch of fear.
We covered this in our PrePrint with Dr. McCullough. @P_McCulloughMD
In a sane world this would lead to immediate moratorium on mRNA transfections until WGS are complete.
We are no longer in a sane world and you should take protection into your own hands osf.io/bcsa6/
You can find them at the below link on the bioRxiv preprint.
A good question from a fellow cat...
When will Whole Genome Sequence Moon?
I think they will need long read sequencing to sort out LINE-1 integration. That usually requires >100ng of DNA.
Human genome is 6pg so 10,000-100,000 cells of DNA are needed to sequence.
Each cell is unlikely to carry integrations in the same location of the genome. So they can't use consensus sequencing (ensemble of all 10,000 cells DNA sequencing) to sort it out. PacBio HiFi sequencing can deliver 150Gb in a single flow cell or 50X coverage per flow cell
More recent studies are pushing this number down to 5ng for PacBio, so they maybe able to get away with 1,000 cells. pacb.com/wp-content/upl…
This might require multiple flow cells. 10 would give you 500X. Either way, this could be over $25K in sequencing but the accuracy of the HiFi reads means each 20Kb read is as good as Sanger sequencing but 30X longer and better for mapping in LINE-1 regions.
They improve at a faster than Moore's law rate and they may be able to better speak to current yields. Will need to be done in those Huh7 cell lines and ultimate in patient biopsies. @PacBio pacb.com/wp-content/upl…
I did leave a comment in Rudi preprint that suggested DNAse and RNAse controls.
It had some push back.
The DNAse and RNAse experiments we just done on BNT162b2 and further move this from conspiracy towards Fact.
Before we get overly focused on Integration….
We should pause to realize this paper has data that should concern us today.
The paper demonstrates vax induced elevated LINE-1 expression.
It is worth reading the Back and Forth on the Jaenisch labs paper (Zhang et al).
They suggest integration with the virus is 2-5 integrations per 10,000 cells.
It is well known from BioNtech (Lenk et al) and Sutton et al (1997) that RNA:DNA hybrids inhibit DNaseI.
What is less known is that Quadruplex Gs also inhibit DNaseI. Some exist in SV40 and we get the most signal from this qPCR amplicon.
2 Different mechanisms of DNaseI inhibition = plasmid fragmentation cannot be assumed to be uniform in the mRNA vaccines. Hence 100 fold more spike than parts of the vector.
Below is a map of the codon optimized spike where Quadruplex Gs are overlaid with GAA repeats. GAA's are stickier RNA:DNA hybrids.
Our qPCR primers are overlayed as well.
@RetsefL @KUPERWASSERLAB @weldeiry @JesslovesMJK @DJSpeicher @TracyBethHoeg @DrJBhattacharya
Evans et al demonstrate DNaseI is resistant to quadruplex Gs. They also move to alternative enzymes. nature.com/articles/s4152…
This is from Lenk et al (BioNtech).
Note the concern over GAA sequences and RNA:DNA hybrids.
Our spike qPCR primers happen to land on GAA rich and quadruplex G rich regions of Spike. frontiersin.org/journals/molec…
@LocasaleLab I find the RNAi worship incongruent will how that entire field was ignored when injecting billions of people with mRNAs.
There are multiple 21bp homologies to human that emerged from the haphazard codon optimizations in the modRNA vaccine and no one cared?
@LocasaleLab Receipts.
Take Pfizers vax Sequence and run it through BLAT.
Hello... anyone from the RNAi space want to speak up about this?
On Veterans Day @CharlesRixey @JesslovesMJK
Stopped by MGC.
2 long days later we had all of his data.
It’s now published in The Journal of Independent Medicine.
It describes the mechanism of failure for the DNA contamination in the mRNA shots and why the regulators are missing it.
@JesslovesMJK @CharlesRixey @weldeiry @KUPERWASSERLAB @RetsefL @DrJBhattacharya @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @TracyBethHoeg
Another Achs et al Fumble uncovered.
These folks don't even understand Capillary Electrophoresis.
Its becoming increasingly clear these are not honest mistakes but designed to deceive by people who are employed at a Vaccine Research Institute.
Science for Sale.
@JesslovesMJK @DJSpeicher
Here is the Rub.
They used a CE instrument that has a lower limit of sensitivity above the 10ng limit.
You need to be able to pick up 10X below the 10ng limit. Or 33pg/ul (300ul dose @ 10ng = 33pg/ul)
This is embarrassingly rigged or they are incompetent.
They ignored our comments on the preprint server and raced their paper into @Nature.
@JesslovesMJK and @DJSpeicher have their own substacks picking up other errors in this paper I'll post sortly.
The Dead Man switch has been lifted. Im not dead but the paper has been accepted.
More edits may appear as the Journal typesets this but this stack has the most current versions, Nostr links, Bitcoin links and Zenodo links.
Why this matters-
This paper demonstrates why the regulators cant find the DNA. The nucleases being used to remove the DNA, fail to digest the RNA:DNA hybrids. So they remove the KAN gene, fail to remove the Spike gene and only go looking for the KAN gene. This is why fluorometry sees ~100X more than qPCR.
And once again, you dont have to believe us. @CanningPharm showed you a paper from BioNtech that spells this out.
They knew this but pointed the regulators to an assay that wouldnt find it.