Integration into the genome... yet. They need long read Whole genome sequencing to prove that which Im sure is currently underway. Rudi showed it was integrated but was critiqued that it could be an artifact of making sequencing libraries. This paper fills in many questions.
The study was well controlled with RNAse confirmation that the target is in fact DNA and not RT of RNA.
Team "Scientific Censorship" has a lot of explaining to do. Many people on this team were vocal opponents of the CRISPR baby experiments run in China. Now they are guilty of
Advocating such experiments on a billion people. It is amazing how pliable their ethics are with a pinch of fear.
We covered this in our PrePrint with Dr. McCullough. @P_McCulloughMD
In a sane world this would lead to immediate moratorium on mRNA transfections until WGS are complete.
We are no longer in a sane world and you should take protection into your own hands osf.io/bcsa6/
You can find them at the below link on the bioRxiv preprint.
A good question from a fellow cat...
When will Whole Genome Sequence Moon?
I think they will need long read sequencing to sort out LINE-1 integration. That usually requires >100ng of DNA.
Human genome is 6pg so 10,000-100,000 cells of DNA are needed to sequence.
Each cell is unlikely to carry integrations in the same location of the genome. So they can't use consensus sequencing (ensemble of all 10,000 cells DNA sequencing) to sort it out. PacBio HiFi sequencing can deliver 150Gb in a single flow cell or 50X coverage per flow cell
More recent studies are pushing this number down to 5ng for PacBio, so they maybe able to get away with 1,000 cells. pacb.com/wp-content/upl…
This might require multiple flow cells. 10 would give you 500X. Either way, this could be over $25K in sequencing but the accuracy of the HiFi reads means each 20Kb read is as good as Sanger sequencing but 30X longer and better for mapping in LINE-1 regions.
They improve at a faster than Moore's law rate and they may be able to better speak to current yields. Will need to be done in those Huh7 cell lines and ultimate in patient biopsies. @PacBio pacb.com/wp-content/upl…
I did leave a comment in Rudi preprint that suggested DNAse and RNAse controls.
It had some push back.
The DNAse and RNAse experiments we just done on BNT162b2 and further move this from conspiracy towards Fact.
Before we get overly focused on Integration….
We should pause to realize this paper has data that should concern us today.
The paper demonstrates vax induced elevated LINE-1 expression.
It is worth reading the Back and Forth on the Jaenisch labs paper (Zhang et al).
They suggest integration with the virus is 2-5 integrations per 10,000 cells.
Background.
Im against the drug war. People should be free to Biohack. Even if the government mandates water, I have a problem with it. Not the water but the force and threat to freedom.
I'm glad Bryan is on this journey and sharing what he finds.
I don't care if he sells stuff on the way. Voluntary economic interactions are legit. People who like to control the narrative will complain.
I couldnt do 100 supplements/day but maybe he'll figure out the key 4-5 that do 90% of the work for others.
Profiling circulating DNA is a thing. I’m just skeptical of the tox seen with LNP delivery of mRNA.
We took the cover of Science Translational Medicine in 2010 with profiling circulating tumor DNA.
I’ve used these profiles to characterize my father’s prostate cancer.
BRAF-K601E Mutation called for AKT1 inhibitors.
Some Cannabinoids are AKT1 inhibitors.
David Meiri does some of the best work on profiling cannabinoids for cancer
@P_J_Buckhaults The reason this is a Holy Sh$t is that the resolution and sensitivity is a game changer.
They dont need to load up 100X the dose to track this.
@P_J_Buckhaults Would be nice if they looked at Ovaries/Testes
@blind_nut @DopplerEffect93 @TheStockRizzer @Crash_the_Flash @Double_Christ @MdBreathe Matthew is too incompetent to map reads.
If he could map reads he’d realize Chakraborty doesn’t need peer review because he is using data from 2 peer reviewed papers.
Doah.
@blind_nut @DopplerEffect93 @TheStockRizzer @Crash_the_Flash @Double_Christ @MdBreathe DNA doesn’t need to get into the nucleus to cause problems.
But it does.
@blind_nut @DopplerEffect93 @TheStockRizzer @Crash_the_Flash @Double_Christ @MdBreathe It binds to P53
Drayman et al