Kevin McKernan Profile picture
Feb 25, 2022 21 tweets 8 min read Read on X
Rudi Jaenisch was harassed by the woke mob for publishing a paper that could incite "vaccine hesitancy".

Looks like his hesitancy was was in order.
This paper demonstrates the BNT162b2 mRNA is getting reverse transcribed into DNA. It DOES NOT show

google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j…
Integration into the genome... yet. They need long read Whole genome sequencing to prove that which Im sure is currently underway. Rudi showed it was integrated but was critiqued that it could be an artifact of making sequencing libraries. This paper fills in many questions. Image
The study was well controlled with RNAse confirmation that the target is in fact DNA and not RT of RNA.
Team "Scientific Censorship" has a lot of explaining to do. Many people on this team were vocal opponents of the CRISPR baby experiments run in China. Now they are guilty of Image
Advocating such experiments on a billion people. It is amazing how pliable their ethics are with a pinch of fear. Image
We covered this in our PrePrint with Dr. McCullough.
@P_McCulloughMD
In a sane world this would lead to immediate moratorium on mRNA transfections until WGS are complete.
We are no longer in a sane world and you should take protection into your own hands
osf.io/bcsa6/
Adding Rudi's paper to thread so it doesn't get lost in the reply's
Fortunately, Twitter has the receipts of the woke Mob.
Check out the comments on this paper.

biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
You can find them at the below link on the bioRxiv preprint. Image
A good question from a fellow cat...
When will Whole Genome Sequence Moon?
I think they will need long read sequencing to sort out LINE-1 integration. That usually requires >100ng of DNA.
Human genome is 6pg so 10,000-100,000 cells of DNA are needed to sequence.
Each cell is unlikely to carry integrations in the same location of the genome. So they can't use consensus sequencing (ensemble of all 10,000 cells DNA sequencing) to sort it out. PacBio HiFi sequencing can deliver 150Gb in a single flow cell or 50X coverage per flow cell
More recent studies are pushing this number down to 5ng for PacBio, so they maybe able to get away with 1,000 cells. pacb.com/wp-content/upl…
This might require multiple flow cells. 10 would give you 500X. Either way, this could be over $25K in sequencing but the accuracy of the HiFi reads means each 20Kb read is as good as Sanger sequencing but 30X longer and better for mapping in LINE-1 regions.
My PacBio yield numbers may be dated from the time we ran HiFi on Jamaican Lion.
medicinalgenomics.com/jamaican-lion-…
They improve at a faster than Moore's law rate and they may be able to better speak to current yields. Will need to be done in those Huh7 cell lines and ultimate in patient biopsies.
@PacBio
pacb.com/wp-content/upl…
I did leave a comment in Rudi preprint that suggested DNAse and RNAse controls.
It had some push back. ImageImageImageImage
The DNAse and RNAse experiments we just done on BNT162b2 and further move this from conspiracy towards Fact. ImageImage
Before we get overly focused on Integration….

We should pause to realize this paper has data that should concern us today.
The paper demonstrates vax induced elevated LINE-1 expression.

Elevated LINE-1 expression is not a good thing.

frontiersin.org/articles/10.33… Image
There are a lot of questions regarding if an integration event would even transcribe or just be a genomic fossil.

We may learn something from HCV.

frontiersin.org/articles/10.33… Image
It is worth reading the Back and Forth on the Jaenisch labs paper (Zhang et al).
They suggest integration with the virus is 2-5 integrations per 10,000 cells.

pnas.org/doi/full/10.10…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin McKernan

Kevin McKernan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Kevin_McKernan

May 23
Are there genetic predispositions to vaccine induced thrombosis, clotting and amyloidogenesis? Image
Neutrophil Extracellular Traps leave a signature on the DNA. Image
Read 7 tweets
May 14
🔥Scientific Misconduct and Plagiarism from Dr. Richard Fleming🔥.

The Journal has been made aware of Richard Fleming plagiarizing our primer sequences and not citing them.

I normally wouldn't care. They are open source but the same primer table in @DJSpeicher et al contained the SV40 primer sequences he NEVER used while still claiming SV40 was not detected. He claimed this 3 times but never actually tested for SV40.

@P_J_Buckhaults
@MaryanneDemasi
@JesslovesMJK
@CanningPharm
@Double_Christ
@dystopian_DUImage
Irony.. Fleming was bragging about his work was peer reviewed.
Or Peer stolen, twisted and obfuscated... but to what ends? Who does Fleming work for and did he copy these sequences and refuse to cite the work while spreading non sense about the SV40 sequences? Image
What are the odds they picked the same primers by chance? Image
Read 5 tweets
May 13
The Czech groups paper is out.

For some reason it claims no SV40 was found but fails to mention they have no primers that could actually find it?

Why would they distort the message like that?

I suspect these Czech authors haven’t done much of a background check on Fleming and just got used.

fmtvdm.com/_files/ugd/659…
No evidence was found because we didn’t use any primers that target SV40.

What kind of hack claim is this?
Which primers in your paper target it? Image
Not once…
But twice in the paper.

No SV40 was found:)
But everyone else can find it. Image
Read 10 tweets
May 10
Remember those debunkers ‘influencers’ who mocked these clots as being spaghetti?

They are definitely of human origin and showing signs of amyloidosis.

The codon optimized spike sequences are amyloidogenic at both the protein level and due to the G4s in the codon opt RNA.
Read 10 tweets
Apr 30
UPDATE!
More people have weighed in on this including the authors of the Re-adenylation paper.
They have been very transparent and helpful.

The plasmid DNA is there.
The 3’UTR sequence that matches the Fauci/Moderna synthetic constructs is shared sequence between the vaccines and points to a hole in our original assembly of the Moderna vaccines.

Here is how we know.
Thanks to @P_J_Buckhaults for suggesting this.Image
If you map reads to the Moderna HIV constructs, you only get coverage over the ends of their HIV vaccines (I checked 4).
You don’t get sequence coverage over the whole construct.
That implies there are shared parts of the plasmids in these Moderna vaccines.
Why does our Moderna vaccine have a 60bp hole in it? We sequenced a bivalent vaccine. The assemblers, when faced with 2 conclusions average then into a consensus and this 60bp is jumbled as a result.
BLAST is currently favoring the alignment to HIV vaccines over our Moderna C19 reference as it’s derived from monovalent sequence and more accurate.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(