Integration into the genome... yet. They need long read Whole genome sequencing to prove that which Im sure is currently underway. Rudi showed it was integrated but was critiqued that it could be an artifact of making sequencing libraries. This paper fills in many questions.
The study was well controlled with RNAse confirmation that the target is in fact DNA and not RT of RNA.
Team "Scientific Censorship" has a lot of explaining to do. Many people on this team were vocal opponents of the CRISPR baby experiments run in China. Now they are guilty of
Advocating such experiments on a billion people. It is amazing how pliable their ethics are with a pinch of fear.
We covered this in our PrePrint with Dr. McCullough. @P_McCulloughMD
In a sane world this would lead to immediate moratorium on mRNA transfections until WGS are complete.
We are no longer in a sane world and you should take protection into your own hands osf.io/bcsa6/
You can find them at the below link on the bioRxiv preprint.
A good question from a fellow cat...
When will Whole Genome Sequence Moon?
I think they will need long read sequencing to sort out LINE-1 integration. That usually requires >100ng of DNA.
Human genome is 6pg so 10,000-100,000 cells of DNA are needed to sequence.
Each cell is unlikely to carry integrations in the same location of the genome. So they can't use consensus sequencing (ensemble of all 10,000 cells DNA sequencing) to sort it out. PacBio HiFi sequencing can deliver 150Gb in a single flow cell or 50X coverage per flow cell
More recent studies are pushing this number down to 5ng for PacBio, so they maybe able to get away with 1,000 cells. pacb.com/wp-content/upl…
This might require multiple flow cells. 10 would give you 500X. Either way, this could be over $25K in sequencing but the accuracy of the HiFi reads means each 20Kb read is as good as Sanger sequencing but 30X longer and better for mapping in LINE-1 regions.
They improve at a faster than Moore's law rate and they may be able to better speak to current yields. Will need to be done in those Huh7 cell lines and ultimate in patient biopsies. @PacBio pacb.com/wp-content/upl…
I did leave a comment in Rudi preprint that suggested DNAse and RNAse controls.
It had some push back.
The DNAse and RNAse experiments we just done on BNT162b2 and further move this from conspiracy towards Fact.
Before we get overly focused on Integration….
We should pause to realize this paper has data that should concern us today.
The paper demonstrates vax induced elevated LINE-1 expression.
It is worth reading the Back and Forth on the Jaenisch labs paper (Zhang et al).
They suggest integration with the virus is 2-5 integrations per 10,000 cells.
🔥Scientific Misconduct and Plagiarism from Dr. Richard Fleming🔥.
The Journal has been made aware of Richard Fleming plagiarizing our primer sequences and not citing them.
I normally wouldn't care. They are open source but the same primer table in @DJSpeicher et al contained the SV40 primer sequences he NEVER used while still claiming SV40 was not detected. He claimed this 3 times but never actually tested for SV40.
Irony.. Fleming was bragging about his work was peer reviewed.
Or Peer stolen, twisted and obfuscated... but to what ends? Who does Fleming work for and did he copy these sequences and refuse to cite the work while spreading non sense about the SV40 sequences?
What are the odds they picked the same primers by chance?
UPDATE!
More people have weighed in on this including the authors of the Re-adenylation paper.
They have been very transparent and helpful.
The plasmid DNA is there.
The 3’UTR sequence that matches the Fauci/Moderna synthetic constructs is shared sequence between the vaccines and points to a hole in our original assembly of the Moderna vaccines.
Here is how we know.
Thanks to @P_J_Buckhaults for suggesting this.
If you map reads to the Moderna HIV constructs, you only get coverage over the ends of their HIV vaccines (I checked 4).
You don’t get sequence coverage over the whole construct.
That implies there are shared parts of the plasmids in these Moderna vaccines.
Why does our Moderna vaccine have a 60bp hole in it? We sequenced a bivalent vaccine. The assemblers, when faced with 2 conclusions average then into a consensus and this 60bp is jumbled as a result.
BLAST is currently favoring the alignment to HIV vaccines over our Moderna C19 reference as it’s derived from monovalent sequence and more accurate.