THREAD: I am absolutely THRILLED the @WSJ is now digging into the details of the Alfa Bank data sharing here. h/t @McAdooGordon. Authors @ByronTau@dnvolz hit several key points that I reported on earlier but also missed several leads. 1/ wsj.com/articles/durha…
2/ They report on emails from GA Tech Right to Know (which I believe I was first reporter to obtain), but miss some of details elaborated on here in piece w/ assist by @Techno_Fogthefederalist.com/2021/11/17/ema…
3/ For those interested in the actual emails showing timing of the contract with DARPA.
Read those in conjunction with the above article showing data search requests. And also who they were going to in connection w/ yesterday
4/ Yesterday's transcript of dep of Joffe provides investigative trails to follow along with theo FOIA emails w/ a big ole h/t to @FOOL_NELSON and @RyanM58699717 who posted on deps release.
5/ But 2 huge points missed in @WSJ piece concern Ops-Trust. Really key point to connect to privacy concerns on which they wrote. Details here, but again, this was team effort w/ @RyanM58699717 pulling those FOIA & @FOOL_NELSON catching Ops-Trust email. thefederalist.com/2022/02/23/let…
7/ Second HUGE point missed in @WSJ connecting to privacy was that that data mining they cover didn't involve just Joffe---Sussmann---CIA/FBI, but in MARCH 2016 also involved Sussmann taking similar data to DOJ's INSPECTOR GENERAL (top guy in OIG). thefederalist.com/2022/01/31/spe…
8/ And that second point reveals another HUGE point related to SpyGate (not these reporters wheelhouse but worty of broader coverage): The DOJ OIG WITHHELD reports on that meeting from Durham & expressly said there wasn't any more materials. (Covered in that article too.)
9/ Circling back now to the Ops-Trust and yesterday's deposition. Alfa's attorneys asked Joffe about the "Union of Concerned Nerds," which was Camp's self-depricating joke about the group. But note Joffe said he didn't belong to any organization.
10/ Compare Joffe's testimony to thefederalist.com/2022/02/23/let… discussion of Ops-Trust and Ops-Trust email Joffe forwarded to Manos.
11/11 So great reporting but given @ByronTau@dnvolz beat is tech and privacy I hope they follow up the Ops-Trust angle. My email to one of their top guys went unanswered as did my emails to lawyers for Joffe, April, Manos, and Dagon.
Post-Bad: Not bad beating the @WSJ by more than 3 months on story given I'm only a "hack" as one of the GA Tech researchers lawyers called me in an email @RyanM58699717 obtained in one of his Right to Know Requests...and since it's my schtick...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD re Joffe's Deposition h/t @FOOL_NELSON@RyanM58699717 1/ While Joffe's claims at time of deposition he expects investigation will be over in a few weeks, apparently they said the same thing several months ago.
2/ Joffe refused to be interviewed and has not testified before the grand jury.
3/ And asked to interview him about a year ago. (the dep is from 2/11.
10/ And what is most striking to me is how the "guardians of the internet" wanted to sell their story when they owned it in Slate & The New Yorker. WHY was that so different than how Durham put it in indictment?
11/11 I emailed one of big-wigs at Ops-Trust and got no response. And lawyers for Joffe, Tea Leaves, & Georgia Tech researchers ignored my requests for comment. So I guess we will have to wait to parse @charlie_savage spin & clean-up.
THREAD: Interesting (and potentially huge) discovery from Durham filings. Today's piece provides the details. Here are highlights. 1/ @FDRLSTthefederalist.com/2022/02/23/let…
2/ Durham's discussion of origins of Alfa Bank hoax and data mining differ significant from Slate's original discussion of how the tech folks discovered Trump's supposed secret communication network with the Russian bank. AND differs significantly from how The New Yorker told it
3/ The New Yorker's story was in 2018 and "Max" i.e. Joffe was the source. If you re-read Slate & The New Yorker & compare to what Durham said, the versions differ greatly.
2/ ICYMI I addressed the request to strike @FDRLSTthefederalist.com/2022/02/17/spe… today and note that the standard doesn't seem met b/c no prejudice--voir dire can take care of that.
3/ Durham's team makes that point here while also noting that it didn't file in bad faith etc.
BREAKING: Michael Sussmann's attorneys file Motion to Dismiss.
2/ This was to be expected. More later as about to do a hit on election integrity.
3/ Just finished quick read, lawsplainer will be forthcoming but in short: This motion seeks dismissal by arguing the facts alleged in the indictment EVEN IF TRUE do not state a crime. In other words, Sussmann did not commit a crime by lying to FBI 's Baker.