Teri Kanefield Profile picture
Feb 26, 2022 21 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Hi, @FrankLuntz, you're getting lots of answers.

One answer comes from the political psychologist.

But first, the simpler answer: The modern Republican Party + Putin = true love because they have common goals.

1/
Putin’s regime, remember, is built on white nationalism, homophobia, and fear of those who are different.

As part of Putin’s rejection of all things communist, he embraced Christianity and aligned himself with American evangelicals.

Here is a timeline . . .

2/
2013: Russia enacted anti-homosexual legislation.
theguardian.com/world/2013/jun…

2014: Pat Buchanan said Putin was “entering a claim that Moscow is the Godly city of today.” He praised Putin for stamping out western evil like easy divorce and homosexuality.
buchanan.org/blog/whose-sid…
3/
British right-winger Katie Hopkins, in an article in which she was interviewed with her friend American right-winger Ann Coulter, said “Putin rocks.”

Hopkins praised Russia as being “untouched by the myth of multiculturalism and deranged diversity.

4/
rt.com
Talk show host Tucker Carlson said the U.S. should “rethink America’s alliances.”

Tucker Carlson basically derided people who claimed that Russia was our enemy.

Senator Rand Paul, who clearly has his own ties to Russia, agreed:

5/ Image
Rand Paul went to Moscow to “open lines of communication.”

He met with Russian leaders and invited them to the United States.
abcnews.go.com/International/…

In 2018, Guiliani attended a pro-Russia conference.
washingtonpost.com/opinions/eight…

6/
Also in 2018, eight Republican leaders spent July 4th in Russia.
washingtonpost.com/opinions/eight…

Paul Hasson, the guy who planned to mass murder liberals, talked of “Looking to Russia with hopeful eyes. ”scribd.com/document/40010…

But that's not where the story starts.

7/
The story really starts earlier when Putin began pumping money to people like Trump.

And when he infiltrated the NRA to make it into a right-wing paramilitary.

And when people like Paul Manafort went to help Putin install a puppet president in Ukraine.

8/
Trump-Russia love goes back to the late 1980s.

Donald Trump allowed anonymous buyers to purchase his luxury condos, and he didn’t ask any questions, so he became a magnet for dirty money.

9/
I'll skip to the part of the story when the Soviet Union dissolved and before democracy could take hold, a few bandits seized control of Russia's industries and resources.

They needed to launder their money.
Trump needed money.

It was a match made in heaven.💕

10/
Trump came to power on two lies: First, birtherism, which connected him with the white supremacist. Second lie: he was a successful businessman.

In fact, he was propped up by Russian money.

Now, for the political psychologists and the authoritarian personality.

11/
Those with an authoritarian disposition have a “bias against different others (racial and ethnic outgroups, immigrants).

They make up about 1/3 of the population. @karen_stenner's research led her to conclude that This percentage occurs across cultures.

12/
They admire strong leaders, like Putin. They tend to fall in line.

They despise "weakness" and they fear people who are different. They like sameness and order, so diversity scares them.

There. In 13 tweets. Why they love Putin.

13/
Now that Russian bombs are homes, the really tough people like Zelenskyy are fighting back, and civilians are confronting Russian soldiers, watch as the Republicans try to distance themselves from Putin.

Don't let them.

Make them go down with Putin's ship.

14/
Appellate lawyers compulsively cite sources, so here's a partial bibliography for this thread:

Paxton, Anatomy of Fascism
Stenner, Authoritarian Dynamic
Gessen, How Totalitarianism Recaimed Russia
Snyder, Road to Unfreedom

Also:
justsecurity.org/60528/understa…

academia.edu/34651963/The_R…
The great Trump+Putin = 💕 continues.

Trump has no choice but to sing Putin's praises.

Just suppose Putin got really angry and started telling the world about some of their private conversations.

For my blog post, I expanded this thread and combined it with a few others to talk about how GOP infatuation with Russian money and willingness to participate in Russian-style corruption brought us to this place.

terikanefield.com/the-renewed-re…

The blog post has 5 parts . . .
I: Gives the background on the love affair between America's far right-wing and the White evangelicals and Putin.

II. Gives just a brief overview of the Trump-Russia connections.

III. Talks about what political psychologists call the authoritarian disposition. . . .
. . . which leads about 1/3 of the population to worship "strong" men, despise weakness, and prefer sameness and order (while fearing complexity, which includes diversity.)

IV. For the people who are SHOCKED that a good percentage of Americans prefer authoritarianism . . .
. . . I include a brief history of authoritarianism in America. Slavery was authoritarian. Jim Crow was authoritarian.

Oligarchy is also part of our history. (See the blog post for more.)

terikanefield.com/the-renewed-re…

Finally . . .
. . . I talk about Republican efforts to backpedal from their Putin-love now that Putin is doing what people like Putin do: Bully people, establish strong-arm control, and try to stamp out democracy (which until now, the GOP has loved.)

There's more.
I also left out a lot.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

Apr 29
Everyone will have a different opinion of the strength of the Manhattan criminal case against Trump.

I am offering no opinions on the strength or who will prevail.

I am saying that people are working too hard to explain the case and figure out the legal theory.

1/
The prosecution has everyone confused because they are framing the case as "election fraud" and "election interference" so everyone is trying to connect the crimes we know about to "election fraud."

2/

terikanefield.com/wheres-the-bee…
The legal theory of the case should be clear.

This would be clear: "It is election fraud. Here is how the evidence will support a charge of election fraud." Then show how the behavior supports election fraud.

Does this mean the prosecution will lose? No.

3/
Read 10 tweets
Mar 11
Finished. (Whew)

As promised, all about Legal pundits and the Outrage Industry, with a few cherished conspiracy theories carefully debunked.

Click here to start:

For years, I was perplexed by what I saw on Twitter. . .

1/ terikanefield.com/can-democracy-…
Image
It seemed to me that the dynamics of social media were making people more authoritarian.

Then I started reading experts in political communication and it all started making sense.


2/ terikanefield.com/can-democracy-…
Image
I wrote parts 1 - 5 in November. I thought I was finished, but I wasn't.

There were still things I didn't understand.

Writers often write to understand, so I kept reading, thinking, and writing.



3/ terikanefield.com/can-democracy-…
Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 9
Whew! I finished.



Everything I promised: How to listen (or not listen) to legal pundits.

It's also about what is dangerous about the entire industry of punditry, speculation, and cable talk shows.

1/terikanefield.com/invented-narra…

For years I was perplexed by what I was seeing on left-leaning Twitter, political blogs, and partisan reporting.

I had the feeling that, in its way, what I was seeing was comparable to Fox: Lots of bad information and even unhinged conspiracy theories.
2terikanefield.com/invented-narra…
Of course, if I suggested that, I was blasted for "both-sidesing."

Then I discovered an area of scholarship: Communications and the overlap between communications and political science.

I read these books and light bulbs went on.

3/ Image
Read 11 tweets
Mar 2
If Trump can win with everything we know about him, what make people think a finding of guilt would change that?

It makes no sense.
Also what if the jury acquits? It can happen.

I do recall the same people thought impeachment and indictment would cause Trump to crumble.
Another contradiction: when people demanded indictments RIGHT NOW (in 2021 and early 2022) the reason was, "Everyone knows he's guilty! Look at all the evidence!"

We saw the J6 committee findings.

Trump isn't saying "I didn't do it." He's saying, "I had the right to do it."

2
We all know what he did. The question is, "Do people want a president who acts like Trump?"

A lot of people do.

People show me polls that a guilty finding would change minds.

I say rubbish. Use common sense. He lost in 2020 and he lost the popular vote in 2016. . .

3/
Read 6 tweets
Feb 29
The news takes 2 minutes to convey.

"Here is what the court did." That is news.

Listening to people speculate about why the court did it and what it means is not news.

It is entertainment.

But it is a special kind of entertainment.

1/
. . . because it is designed to keep people hooked. People need to stay glued to the screen for hour after hour.

But to hook people, you need to scare them. The Facebook whistleblower testified that content that produces strong emotions like anger gets more engagement.

2/
Fox does the same thing. There is a few minutes of news, but the facts get lost as commentators and TV personalities speculate and scare their audiences.

Before you yell at me for comparing MSNBC to FOX, read all of this:

3/terikanefield.com/can-democracy-…
Read 5 tweets
Feb 29
If I write another blog post addressing the outrage cycle here on Twitter and in the MSNBC ecosystem, it will be to explore why so many people who believe they are liberal or progressive actually want a police state.

1/
Today alone, a handful of people who consider themselves liberal or progressive told me that the "traitors need to be arrested and prosecuted."

In 2019, back when I wore myself out tamping down misinformation, I explained the legal meaning of treason.

2/
Back then, I now realize, people asked politely: "Can Trump be prosecuted for treason (over the Russia election stuff).

I explained that wouldn't happen.

Now it's different. It's more like fascist chants.

3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(