The US, EU, Canada, & the UK just released a joint statement committing to several major sanctions actions, including a SWIFT ban and restrictions on the Central Bank of Russia. This is a big deal, but details will matter. Here's my initial analysis (🧵):
ec.europa.eu/commission/pre…
(1) On SWIFT, the allies committed to remove "selected" Russian banks from SWIFT. This is a good move. It means that the allies will couple blocking sanctions with targeted SWIFT bans. Only banks that are sanctioned will be blocked from SWIFT. It will not be a blanket SWIFT ban.
What will I be watching for? The names of the "selected" banks. If the banks include the big fish—Sberbank, VTB, and Gazprombank—this is an absolutely huge deal. Let's wait and see.
(2) On the Central Bank of Russia, the allies committed to "prevent the Russian Central Bank from deploying its international reserves in ways that undermine the impact of our sanctions." That is hard to read, but it doesn't necessarily mean full-blocking sanctions.
The wording suggest a more scalpel-like measure, in which the allies prevent the CBR from deploying reserves to bail out other sanctioned entities. Yes, this would be a big deal. But it would not be as big of a deal as full-blocking sanctions on the Central Bank of Russia.
What will I be watching for? In addition to the details above, I'm interested if implementation is immediate or if there's a grace period (like w/the Sberbank measure earlier this week). To maximize impact, the allies should impose full-blocking sanctions with immediate effect.
(3) The statement also includes wording that puts Putin cronies on notice. It indicates the allies will take steps to ban the sale of golden passports to the Russian elite—particularly those connected to the Kremlin.
My guess is they included this warning to incentivize elites to distance themselves from Putin's war and perhaps to criticize it. What will I be watching for? How broad the list is. Most of Putin's closest cronies are already sanctioned. Will all billionaires be targeted?
(4) Finally, the allies committed to collaborate to ensure effective sanctions implementation. This is not a headline, but it could be significant. Sanctions enforcement tends to be far more lax in Europe than in the US. Amping up EU sanctions enforcement would be important.
The allies also committed "to detect and disrupt the movement of ill-gotten gains, and to deny these individuals the ability to hide their assets in jurisdictions across the world." Sounds like a general commitment to beef up anti-corruption regimes.
Revamping global anti-corruption regulations to actually curtail Russian money laundering and stashing of ill-gotten gains would be a big deal. It will take time to do this. I hope the allies are committed to making it happen.
(5) Overall, this is a strong statement. It signals unified intent to impose comprehensive sanctions on Russia. Details will matter. But the train has left the station: this statement will box in leaders to deliver major sanctions in the coming days unless Putin backs down. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eddie Fishman

Eddie Fishman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @edwardfishman

Feb 28
The US just unveiled the details of its sanctions against the Central Bank of Russia. Bottom line: This is close to the most ambitious form that this action could take. Here's my initial analysis (🧵):
(1) As I explained on Saturday, the joint statement hinted at limited sanctions against the CBR. Not blocking sanctions (i.e., asset freeze and transaction ban), but something more scalpel-like to prevent the CBR from undermining other sanctions.
(2) Then, Ursula von der Leyen, European Commission president, dropped a bombshell, saying sanctions would "paralyze the assets of Russia’s central bank" & "freeze its transactions." To my ear, this sounded a lot like blocking sanctions—the strongest sanctions tool we have. Image
Read 6 tweets
Feb 25
As Russian forces move on Kyiv, it's time to get serious about ratcheting sanctions up a notch. The US and Europe have ample room for escalation. A few thoughts on the option set (🧵):
(1) So far, the sanctions effort has focused on Russia's state-owned banks. But only one major bank—VTB—has been fully blocked. A next wave of sanctions could involve full-blocking sanctions against Sberbank, Gazprombank, and other major Russian financial institutions.
(2) There has been a lot of talk about SWIFT. First things first: it is the EU, not the US, that has the authority to cut Russian banks off from SWIFT. All the US can do is apply pressure and persuasion to make that happen. Cutting Russian banks off from SWIFT ...
Read 14 tweets
Feb 24
Putin's unprovoked war against Ukraine is a crime against humanity. No sanctions can be proportional to the violence wrought upon Ukraine. The least the West can do is impose "swift and severe consequences" as @POTUS has promised.

A few thoughts on what this should look like:
(1) Step 1 should be a hammer blow against Russia's financial sector. What does that mean? Full-blocking sanctions against all major state-owned Russian banks. VEB, targeted on Tuesday, is the fifth-largest Russian financial institution. Sanctions on the others should follow.
(2) The reason the financial sector is target #1 is because oil markets are tight right now. Aggressive sanctions on Russia's oil sector could spike oil prices, perversely benefiting Russia. That said, this doesn't mean the oil sector should be off the table (more on this later).
Read 8 tweets
Feb 22
What do today's first wave of US sanctions mean? A short 🧵 ...
(1) The US imposed full-blocking sanctions on VEB, the fifth-largest Russian financial institution. VEB serves as a policy instrument of the Russian state. Why does this matter? It's the first time the US has used its toughest sanctions tool on a major state-owned Russian bank.
(2) The use of full-blocking sanctions against VEB represents a step change from where we were in 2014. What does it signal? That the Biden administration is prepared to use this tool against other state-owned Russian banks, including even larger ones, if conditions warrant it.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 21
With Putin apparently gearing up for war, indications are that the initial US sanctions package is ready to go. A few points for those trying to parse the sanctions and what they will mean (a short 🧵):
(1) The first wave of sanctions, including restrictions on Russian banks and export controls, will rattle Russia's economy. The Russian government will probably need to step in and rescue some financial institutions. Inflation will spike and the ruble will fall.
(2) That said, the US will hold a lot in reserve. Even after the first wave, there will be ample room for escalation. Oil and gas will likely be left out. As the largest sectors of Russia's economy, they will be prime targets for subsequent rounds of sanctions (if required).
Read 6 tweets
Feb 18
.@POTUS said he is "convinced" Putin has decided to invade Ukraine. It was a chilling statement and an ominous sign of what lies ahead. If Putin does invade, the US will follow up in short order with its threat to impose sanctions. A few thoughts on what that means:
(1) The US sanctions package will be very strong—at least an order of magnitude tougher than 2014. What does that mean? Not Iran-level sanctions (yet), but starting down that path: the largest Russian banks will be cut off from the US financial system ...
... which, in itself, will cause substantial economic dislocation. Other measures will include sweeping export controls and restrictions on state-owned Russian companies. The Russian economy will suffer a deep recession. No, Putin has not made the economy "sanctions proof."
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(