Why has Ukraine been so successful at information warfare/propaganda vs the supposed Russian masters of it?
A thread 🧵 of 10 persuasion messaging themes working for them:
1) Pre-Bunking
In the past, Russia was essentially pushing against an open door.
This time, a network style coalition got ahead of it and preempted and pre-bunked the Russian goal of justifying a long planned invasion as an emergency response.
Elements ranged from UKR govt to Biden administration and US intelligence agencies to key NATO states (Baltics especially) to online democracy activists to OSINT trackers.
They documented the Russian military buildup in overall ways
And in close up, visuals
Another part was directly debunking the various Russian statements and provocations as utterly pre-planned. One example was showing the meetings didn't match their timing claim, by tiny details like the watch times:
Overall, it showed 1) what Russia was planning and also 2) took away the Russian claimed messaging that they were the victim
Once the war began, it pivoted to the next series of themes. 2) Heroism
Pushing early stories of Ukrainians standing up to fight against the odds.
Probably the most successful was fighter ace #ghostofkiev
(Also, illustrates how much is likely a mix of truth/ exaggeration)
3) Martyrs
Related to Heroes, but with the sacrifice element
The Snake Island defenders and their iconic "Go F+ck Yourself" message to the Russian commander is the example here
UKR has also kept that up with regular posts about soldiers that died in some heroic manner, such as blowing up a bridge or delaying a Russian convoy.
4) Man of the People
Volodymyr Zelenskyy has set the new standard for this classic tactic.
Remember, he went into the conflict not that well known outside Ukraine, while inside Ukraine, some polls have him negative -34 favorability, amid general distrust of office of the presidency. Basically, he was the most popular of a set of unpopular leaders. Now a global icon.
The former performer has done so with personal bravery and deft use of messaging
A key in this is to remember the multiple audiences he is aiming at. One is UKR people and soldiers, the power of a leader who is right there with them, literally in the streets
Another, of course, is to contrast with Putin
But there is also the key audience of the West and its leaders. The response of
"I Need Ammunition, Not A Ride"
To US offers to evacuate him
Or, even more pointed, the call out to the Italian leaders, when they were delaying aid and blamed a missed call.
Again, every act in #likewar is about connecting this online show to a real world goal
5) Civilian Harm
Messaging that shows off the victims of the Russian attacks are the UKR people in vivid ways.
It does so with examples of Russian strikes that don't just resonate, but also are clearly and inarguably civilian in nature, such as a missile hit near a playground.
Or in front of a grocery store
(I'll get to cat images later)
This is also about showing war crimes:
6) Civilian Resistance
This war, in both cause+info side, is about political legitimacy and popular resistance. So hugely important thread is showing citizens fighting back.
"Put sunflower seeds in your pocket so they grow when you die"
is most viral
But also many, many examples of this swirling, from people blocking tanks
To regular people preparing for the next fight with home-made molotov cocktails
7) Bandwagoning
This is about motivating others to join/aid a cause that is popular and growing. It is also a bit about shaming those that aren't doing so yet.
'Others are doing it, why not you too?'
8) Humanizing
Showing off the personal side. 'The Ukrainians under attack are just like us.' 'They like the same things I do.' 'I could imagine myself in that situation.'
This is where the cat is the most lethal weapon of information warfare.
And when I wrote cats are "lethal" in information war, I meant it...
(Note: I am deeply dubious of the Panther of Kharkiv" but now I want to adopt it.)
9) Card Stacking
This is about showing off singular example of your individual wins, to shape the narrative of the overall flow of the war.
Playing up the early defeat of the defeat of the (insanely badly planned) Russian attack on Hostomel airport is a great example
These cardstacking examples might be clinical, such as video of a successful drone strike
(side note: the fact that the Russians still allowing slow UKR drones to operate, despite all their airpower, is amazing display of ineptitude)
Or it might be personalized, such as a UKR soldier in the wake of an ambush of a Russian column, walking about with the unmistakable swagger of a victor
10) Mockery
Russia's hope for a quick win, both vs UKR, but also the West in its potential response, depending on over-awing a dispirited foe.
Mockery inverts that, making the attacker the butt of the jokes, making them seem small and absurd to accept as the victor.
Is the above working?
It really matters about the audience: 1) Inside UKR, by most accounts, it has. This is proven most by very fact the UKR government and society didn't dissolve and collapse the way Russia hoped would happen in the first few days.
2) Inside Russia is a different matter. There is too much government control of the media, active govet messaging of them winning and righteous cause, censorship and arrests, and different social networks that aren't seeing much of above (Twitter vs VK, for example).
But the longer the conflict goes, the harder this gets for the Putin regime. Death news is harder to control, narrative of an easy win harder to spin if it lasts weeks, the story of UKR being the victims that you are rescuing is harder to sustain if you are leveling Kiev etc.
This is also something that this network I wrote of is actively going after. For example, Russian POW families are reportedly being contacted on the VK social network to let them know their kids are alive, but also with some added mustard to the message...
3) The West and the US. The UKR side in the information war has definitely won.
The best example here is the 180 degree pivot in just 48 hours by political leaders on the right
Or the narrative change on cable news:
From
"Has Putin ever called me a racist? Has he threatened to get me fired for disagreeing with him? Vladimir Putin didn’t do any of that."
to
"Ukrainian civilians volunteer to fight for democracy"
I gotta go pick up my kid from the bus, so finis for now.
Hope this was useful.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"As Gen. Omar Bradley is credited as saying, “Amateurs talk strategy. Professionals talk logistics.” ...Unfortunately, when it comes to how the American defense community plans for and talks about the future of competition and conflict in the Pacific, it isn’t measuring up"
"...the norm of the literally thousands of leader speeches, congressional testimonies, vision statements, and interviews on the future of war and competition and conflict with China. If logistics is mentioned at all, which is rare, it is a toss-off line."
In honor of all the policy thinktanks and media trying to leverage the #Oppenheimer movie for their own purposes , I provide you with a thread of #BarbieTheMovie fighting back.
In it, I substitute "Barbie" into your texts...Let's see what fun we can have:
The Aspen Barbie Forum is the premier Barbie policy conference in the United States. Presented by the Barbie Strategy Group, It has provided a nonpartisan public venue for domestic and global leaders to discuss the key Barbie policy issues of the day for the past 14 years.
The Forum features the highest caliber of speakers, including Ken, Skipper, Midge, Nikki, Teresa, Summer, Stacie, and Taffy, as well as domestic and international government officials, business executives, leading academics, and noted journalists.
(a thread, sharing my response to a question from a senior leader on it)
Almost every new tech in war, whether the battleship to nuclear weapons, has created new questions of their use and abuse, often leading to arms control discussions. So we should not be surprised to see this happen with AI and robotics.
Yet, this new wave of intelligent automation is different in that it is more than just another new tool.
Imagine if they were actually serious about this 1 door nonsense talking point, as the Republican policy solution for school shootings.
Wouldn’t it be an utter indictment of the Heritage Foundation that they didn’t propose something so simple as that, for decades?
IE, if you actually believe that idea, you should be angry at all the needless dead children because your thinktanks didn’t think of it and failed your red state leaders. It would be a massive Intelligence failure and question wasted millions of dollars.
'@Heritage, I donated $ to you for years. And yet you delivered nothing on 1 door schools!
Where were the short policy briefs on the conservative case for 1 doors?
Where were the op-eds on how Hungary has 1 doors and that is why they have no mass shootings?
Talk to them. Ask them their fears and concerns.
They will bring up threats like School Shootings, Climate Change, and the Pandemic. They will also talk about behavioral/social problems like Racism, Social Media Harassment, and Bullying.
On each of these, the GOP position has either been to deny the problem or, even worse, exacerbate it, whether it is denying the science and facts of everything from climate change to gun control to making its leader the most well known social media bully IN THE WORLD.
The counter narrative soon to below:
'If you don't like being assigned to an abortion ban state, tough. No one made you join the military, just like no one 'makes' you get pregnant. Handle your business, follow the state law, or leave."
2) Way to help recruiting and retention, in an era of unprecedented unemployment, Fred Flintstone. 3) This legal change effects just the soldier who signed up, but their spouse, partner, even daughter.
4) Pregnancy is not always a choice. Women, including yes military service members and their spouses, partners, and daughters can suffer rape or incest, which many states won't allow abortion for. Now, they'll have no choice but to have child or request leave/violate local law