Post

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
Click again on or Share Via icon
Click on Copy Link to Tweet
Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
More info at Twitter Help

Tivadar Danka

@TivadarDanka

Mar 1, 2022 • 15 tweets • 4 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

Let's test your probabilistic intuition!

There are 25 people in a room. What is the probability that two of them share the same birthday?

If you think it is low, you'll be surprised to find out that the actual probability is more than 50%.

Here is why!

↓ A thread. ↓

The usual thinking is if there are 25 people and 365 days in a year, then chances should be roughly 24/365 ≈ 6.5%, and if we have 366 people, then it is guaranteed that two of them share birthdays.

However, this is not how probability works.

First, it is much easier to talk about the probability of having no shared birthdays.

This is a common trick, often making the calculations much more manageable.

Let's simplify the problem even more.

Given two people, what is the probability of sharing the same birthday?

By encoding the birthday with an integer between 1 and 365 and the configurations as tuples, we can easily count their total number.

How many days can we pick as the 1st element of the tuple? 365.
How many days can we pick as the 2nd element to avoid the birthday collision? 364.

In total, there are 365*364 ways.

To count the number of total configurations, we simply disregard the potential birthday collision.

Thus, there are 365*365 possibilities.

Now we can calculate the probability as the ratio of the number of desired outcomes and all possible outcomes.

In this case, the result is the following.

Summing up, the probability of two people sharing the same birthdays is less than one percent.

What about the general case?

Following the same logic, we can solve the general problem.

At n = 23 people, the probability reaches 50%.

At n = 41, the probability is 90%.

Quite surprising, isn't it?

If you are curious, this is what the probabilities look like.

https://twitter.com/TivadarDanka/status/1497103436227264523

A few days ago, I posted this very same question, asking you to estimate the probability of shared birthdays, given 25 people.

These were your answers.

https://twitter.com/TivadarDanka/status/1497103436227264523

What can we learn from the birthday problem?

That our intuition about probability often fails hard. When asked, most estimate the chances of having a shared birthday among 25 people very low, even though the actual probability is more than 50%.

Having a deep understanding of math will make you a better engineer. I want to help you with this, so I am writing a comprehensive book about the subject.

If you are interested in the details and beauties of mathematics, check out the early access!

tivadardanka.com/book

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @TivadarDanka

Tivadar Danka

@TivadarDanka

Dec 4, 2023

Understanding graph theory will seriously enhance your engineering skills; you must absolutely be familiar with them.

Here's a graph theory quickstart, in collaboration with Alejandro Piad Morffis.

Read on:

What do the internet, your brain, the entire list of people you’ve ever met, and the city you live in have in common?

These are all radically different concepts, but they share a common trait.

They are all networks that establish relationships between objects.

As distinct as these things seem to be, they share common properties.

For example, the meaning of “distance” is different for

• physical networks,
• information netorks,
• orf social networks,

but in all cases, there is a sense in which some objects are “close” or “far”.

Read 15 tweets

Tivadar Danka

@TivadarDanka

Sep 13, 2023

Neural networks are stunningly powerful.

This is old news: deep learning is state-of-the-art in many fields, like computer vision and natural language processing. (But not everywhere.)

Why are neural networks so effective? I'll explain.

First, let's formulate the classical supervised learning task!

Suppose that we have a dataset D, where xₖ is a data point and yₖ is the ground truth.

The task is simply to find a function g(x) for which

• g(xₖ) is approximately yₖ,
• and g(x) is computationally feasible.

To achieve this, we fix a parametrized family of functions. For instance, linear regression uses this function family:

Read 19 tweets

Tivadar Danka

@TivadarDanka

Sep 12, 2023

A question we never ask:

"How large that number in the Law of Large Numbers is?"

Sometimes, a thousand samples are large enough. Sometimes, even ten million samples fall short.

How do we know? I'll explain.

First things first: the law of large numbers (LLN).

Roughly speaking, it states that the averages of independent, identically distributed samples converge to the expected value, given that the number of samples grows to infinity.

We are going to dig deeper.

There are two kinds of LLN-s: weak and strong.

The weak law makes a probabilistic statement about the sample averages: it implies that the probability of "the sample average falling farther from the expected value than ε" goes to zero for any ε.

Let's unpack this.

Read 15 tweets

Tivadar Danka

@TivadarDanka

Aug 24, 2023

With the power of mathematical induction, I'll prove that everyone has the same eye color.

Don't believe me? Read on.

(And see if you can spot the sleight of hand.)

To formalize the problem, define the proposition Aₙ by

Aₙ = "in a set of n people, everyone has the same eye color".

If n equals the human population of planet Earth, we get the original statement. We'll prove that Aₙ is true via induction.

Proof by induction works like climbing an infinite staircase.

First, we'll show A₁. Then, we'll show that if Aₙ is true, then Aₙ₊₁ is true as well.

This way, Aₙ is true for any positive integer via the chain of implications

A₁ → A₂ → ... → Aₙ.

Read 13 tweets

Tivadar Danka

@TivadarDanka

Aug 21, 2023

The single biggest argument about statistics: is probability frequentist or Bayesian? It's neither, and I'll explain why.

Buckle up. Deep-dive explanation incoming.

First, let's look at what is probability.

Probability quantitatively measures the likelihood of events, like rolling six with a dice. It's a number between zero and one. This is independent of interpretation; it’s a rule set in stone.

In the language of probability theory, the events are formalized by sets within an event space.

(The event space is also a set, usually denoted by Ω.)

Read 34 tweets

Tivadar Danka

@TivadarDanka

Aug 8, 2023

The Japanese multiplication method makes everybody feel "I wish they taught math like this in school."

It's not just a cute visual tool: it illuminates how and why long multiplication works.

Here is the full story.

First, the Japanese multiplication method.

The first operand (21 in our case) is represented by two groups of lines: two lines in the first (1st digit), and one in the second (2nd digit).

One group for each digit.