Shaun Lawson Profile picture
Mar 1 15 tweets 3 min read
This is absolutely excellent by @davidfrum - because it does that all too rare thing. It explains economics in layman's terms. 👏

David's final point about the danger of sanctions being TOO effective is partly why they don't apply to energy. Yet.

theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
At this point, a semi-digression. UK citizens are, of course, almost all paid in pounds and most only concern themselves with foreign exchange when heading abroad: on holiday in most cases.

Where I live - a small upper-middle income country - that isn't the case at all.
Here, expensive things - like electronics or most obviously, property - are priced in US dollars. Which I also pay my rent in.

When I arrived here in 2012, there were 19 Uruguayan pesos to the dollar: the former was a ridiculously overvalued currency. It's now about 43.
What that means is most professionals' bank accounts are in pesos, dollars and euros. Even, in some cases, indexed units, which the government use to keep track of inflation and maintain economic stability.

I have a bank loan priced in indexed units, for example.
So it's exactly as David explains. You just click a button to convert pesos to dollars or vice versa; and dollars, not pesos, are what the middle classes and above save in.

The peso is actually a relatively strong South American currency. Emphasis on 'relative'.
Because if you use a credit card to pay for something in pesos, you're looking at an annual interest rate of between 55% and 100%. 😳😮

I did a double take when I got my first credit card here and looked at the Ts and Cs. "That HAS to be a mistake", I thought. Nope.
Loans in pesos are even worse. Far worse. The compound interest means if you take out a loan for say, 3 years, you'll end up paying double or a lot more back.

Yet what's the annual credit card interest rate in dollars? Usually between about 6.5% and 9%. A whopping difference.
You have to price in that the dollar strengthens against the peso long term - albeit, it's been very stable at between 43 and 45 for about 2 years now.

But it means that if you need to use a credit card, doing so in dollars is imperative. Only some transactions offer that.
So when I monitor my finances, I'm forever doing currency conversions in my head. Which also include pounds because of international clients I have based in the UK.

That Russian business will be hit astronomically by being unable to trade in dollars, euros or pounds is a given.
The rouble is absolute junk. That's not affected the oligarchs and much of Russian business in any way before.

In fact, it'll have HELPED them given they'll have done all their business in foreign exchange, then spent locally in roubles.
Just as people in Uruguay paid entirely in dollars or euros, who then spend locally in pesos, are having a ball.

But those Russian billionaires will be affected now. Big style. It is very difficult to see how that doesn't hugely tighten the noose around Putin.
Incidentally: those Uruguayan interest rates I mentioned?

I do not have the first clue how anyone in Argentina - businesspeople or especially employees - plan for anything at all.

Their inflation rates are insane.
And whereas 10 years ago, there were 0.2 Uruguayan pesos to the Argentinian peso (in other words, the latter was five times stronger than the former), there are now over 2.5.

The Uruguayan peso has gained in strength by TWELVE AND A HALF TIMES v Argentina's currency in a decade
The Argentinian Central Bank cannot stop printing money and its government is always near defaulting again and again.

By contrast, Uruguay maintains all its international obligation and its Central Bank is damn, damn smart. Regardless of which party is in government.
I can even log into the Central Bank website here and check my credit rating for free.

Can't do that in the UK! The measures here - especially indexed units - work and keep the economy amazingly stable. An oasis of calm, basically.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shaun Lawson

Shaun Lawson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shaunjlawson

Mar 2
This is a thread about empathy. Specifically: *selective* empathy.

Which we're all guilty of to some extent - the lives of some seemingly mattering to us a lot more than others - the right even more so. Note Tory flag waving over Ukraine while curtailing the right to protest.
Note perennial Republican pleas for 'the right to life' while opposing any gun controls at all, openly encouraging people not to be vaccinated, decrying masks, and deliberately making life itself as hard as humanly possible for anyone not born into wealth.
"If you're preborn, you're fine. If you're preschool, you're f****d".

But the left has its own huge blind spots on this. They bewilder me often, though I get where they mostly come from. They come from TOO MUCH of a focus on our own wanton hypocrisy in the West.
Read 77 tweets
Mar 2
Notice how leftist commentators are only too pleased to share bullshit headlines - and to lie based on those headlines.

Embarrassing. Pathetic. Contemptible.
A rather massive part of how we've all ended up here is that so many people have the attention spans of a gnat, cannot be bothered just to CLICK A BLOODY MOUSE BUTTON AND READ THE DAMN ARTICLE, and treat a headline as though they're the only thing that counts.
They then all rush in to condemn based on the headline, they all share fake news and utter bollocks, and the corrosion of our politics continues.

Thanks to THEM. A whole hail of idiots who learn absolutely nothing.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 1
Victim blaming. We ASKED FOR IT with our support for a country which wants to be part of the EU and needs protection from Russia!

Russian claims of the 'threat to it' posed by NATO are the same as Russian claims that Assad didn't use CW or of a 'Nazi junta' running Ukraine. Lies
The real 'threat' to Putin's Russia is of a successful liberal democracy on its borders, showing the Russian people the very real alternative that's possible.

Putin grew up in the Cold War. He was a KGB agent for 16 years during the Cold War. He sees the world through that lens.
A very large reason why the USSR lost the Cold War - which Putin considers 'the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the twentieth century' - was that the peoples of Eastern Europe saw that our values and our system were infinitely preferable.

Putin fears it happening again.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 1
1. NATO is a defensive alliance.

2. NATO is no threat to Russia.

3. Russia is indeed led by a mad man. Definition of mad man: taking his country to absolute catastrophe.

4. Strange how those furious about Iraq or Palestine think Ukraine should just roll over.
Except of course, it's not strange - because when it comes to a choice between liberal democracy and authoritarianism at the barrel of a gun, you choose the latter, don't you Jeffrey?

As long as it's not YOU living under militarised dictatorship, that is.
Do you know when NATO last expanded close to Russia's borders? 2004. What a terrifying 'threat' given nothing happened for 18 years until Putin united us all - other than you of course - with his evil.

There's no doubt. You'd have been demanding we sue for peace in May 1940.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 1
Let's update the map of how things currently look. With an absolutely mammoth column of Russian tanks - 64km long - headed towards Kyiv, the answer is increasingly grim. 😢

This is Phase 2 now. With Russia changing strategy, using thermobaric weapons and pouring forces in. Image
Forces which are likely to be better trained, better resourced and more experienced.

A couple of days ago, I mentioned Russia's obvious aim of land access from the breakaway areas in the east to Crimea. They're getting closer to achieving that now.
But focus in particular on the Dnieper River, one of the largest in Europe. That river splits Ukraine in half.

It seems to me that Putin's plan is very likely to involve annexing the whole eastern half of Ukraine - with Kyiv put under siege until the government surrenders.
Read 18 tweets
Feb 28
'Anti-imperialist' dictates to democratic sovereign people what they should or shouldn't do. "No NATO"? Yes, what a BRILLIANT idea. 🙄🙄🙄

Meanwhile, this may come as news to some, but some people die in wars. A war started by the Fifth Column I referred to.
Your comment about 'Obama and Co deciding who was in government' is complete, total, absolute, disgraceful nonsense.

Ukraine's Parliament and shortly afterwards, Ukraine's people decided who was in government. Your total contempt for all of them sums you up.
"But Nuland but Nuland". People coming out with this drivel are thick as bloody mince.

And support someone who jailed his main rival, whose previous rival was poisoned by Russia, who stole SEVENTY BILLION DOLLARS from the people, who slaughtered 100 protestors.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(