Tom Nichols Profile picture
Mar 1 4 tweets 1 min read
If you think intervention is worth World War III in Ukraine - and yes, I understand the arguments for that - then just say it. Because this cocked-up warplan in UKR is not the plan that will come off the shelf if NATO intervenes.
/1
If NATO did intervene, and Russia widens its war to go after NATO nations, they will lose. But first, there will be a rally among Russians who would MUCH rather fight NATO than their brothers and sisters in UKR. /2
And when Russia is faced with losing, and this is no longer over Putin's war in Ukraine but the General Staff's losing war in Europe, people in Moscow who might *never* agree to go to the wall for Putin might well be willing to go down in flames rather than lose to NATO. /3
Way too many of you have lived in a world of peace and security for so long that you cannot even imagine the cataclysmic risks you're advocating. This is not a game and it's not a social media campaign. Sober up. /4x

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom Nichols

Tom Nichols Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RadioFreeTom

Feb 28
Putin is following in the same footsteps as the Soviet predecessors he reveres so much. In the mid-70s, America was defeated, economically hurting, and NATO was a mess. Stupid Soviet policies reinvigorated NATO and helped lead to the final decade of Soviet rule. /1
Not only did Soviet aggression turn Jimmy Carter into a new Cold Warrior, but as Politburo advisor Georgii Arbatov later admitted. the Soviets themselves helped to bring people like Reagan to power. (Interestingly, this is only in the *Russian* version of his memoirs.) /2
Putin, now as delusional and paranoid as the old men of the Kremlin 40 years ago, is doing the same thing, creating a firm Western coalition against him at a time when American and NATO would prefer, mostly, to ignore Russia and just do business. /3
Read 4 tweets
Feb 24
It's time for a confession.

Well over 20 years ago, I was in Poland, and we were talking with our Polish colleagues about NATO expansion. I was pretty dismissive of the idea that Russia would make war on their brothers in Ukraine.

I was wrong. /1
Maybe I was just optimistic, after living through the Cold War. Maybe I believed in the basic humanity of the Russian people.

I still believe in that.

But the idea that Russians, freed from communism, would make war on their neighbors seemed utterly fantastic to me.
/2
I want to believe that there are people -even in the Kremlin - who will stop Putin before this becomes a global cataclysm. But I cannot deny that I was too optimistic, too heady with the end of the Cold War, to believe that anyone had the stomach for another European war. /3
Read 5 tweets
Feb 14
Unrelated to the specific kerfuffle in my TL, here's a thought.

If you are inclined to believe that snotty blue checks don't engage people, do not complain when said blue check engages everyone as best he can.

There's one of me, many of you responding. /1
If you're telling me what to answer, what subjects to cover, or that you think I'm just here to "stir the pot" or other accusations of bad faith, I'll just block you to clear out the TL. I've had enough of that, thankyouverymuch.

I do my best to respond as much as I can. /2
My life would be a lot easier and more fun to just respond to the attaboys or just ignore all comments entirely, but that's never been my approach.

If you don't like the subject, then mute the thread, stop following, or turn off Twitter. You are grownups and have that power.
/3
Read 4 tweets
Jan 24
This was a group of very senior guys, GO/FO level some of them, and I snapped off a few shots of them. My man General Crackdown in the middle was not happy, as you can see.
I pulled the fill roll and made my mom stick it in her bra while was approached by an officer. /1
He, uh, told me to hand it over and come with him. I told him I didn't speak Russian. He switched to German. I told him I didn't speak German, either, but probably shouldn't have admitted I knew it was German. /2
My mother had no idea where she was in Moscow but I told her: "Film in bra, head away from me, I'll catch up."
The officer gave up and I started speaking English *loudly* and waving like Gomer Pyle and walked away. Mom and I made it to the Metro. /3
Read 4 tweets
Jan 17
@MelissaJPeltier @ericowensdc @ScottDguy @RachelBitecofer @tonyserrata @djosephdixon @harrisonjaime @DavidPepper What too many people on the left (in my not humble opinion) is that being *right* about a lot of Trump voters is not a platform. Republicans for years have branded themselves as "the party of everyone not specially favored by the Dems" and this was genius.
Trump blew that up. /1
@MelissaJPeltier @ericowensdc @ScottDguy @RachelBitecofer @tonyserrata @djosephdixon @harrisonjaime @DavidPepper And for a time after 2017, the *Dems* were making a great play for "being the party of everyone except this weird rightist coalition." This was the right play: to make the Dems the party of "we'll make everyone's life better."
But it's so hard for them to just keep doing that. /2
@MelissaJPeltier @ericowensdc @ScottDguy @RachelBitecofer @tonyserrata @djosephdixon @harrisonjaime @DavidPepper For those asking "What's the REPUBLICAN platform, huh?!" you're missing the point. They've gone back to being "not identity-driven and boutique issue Democrats who will hector you like self-righteous college students."
They don't need a platform to do that. /3
Read 4 tweets
Jan 13
In this piece, @Jbarro notes my frustration with people who will not vote to save democracy because they're worried about inflation. I take the point, but I have *always* felt this way about voters reacting to stuff that presidents don't control. /1

joshbarro.com/p/obsessing-ov…
In fact, one of the reasons I became a Republican in the late 70s was that I grew up in a blue collar area where people thought it was the responsibility of the President to find a job for every wage-earner, which isn't the way it works. (And I heard that a lot.) /2
I pleaded with people: You have mayors, state reps, governors. State government. You have to vote at the national level for things of national importance and solve local stuff at the local level. But nope. /3
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(