You might be wondering: Why hasn't the ruble fallen *further* following US EU UK sanctions against the Russian Central Bank? After all, don't these sanctions prevent currency stabilization by freezing Russia's $630 bn+ of reserves? 1/n
Yes but: Russia still has positive fx flows and the Russian Central Bank has enlisted exporters to act as currency stabilization agents by requiring them to sell 80 % of their fx for rubles, meaning when they receive dollars they sell most of them from rubles 2/n
Because the EU is still buying energy from Russia through Russian banks using dollars and euros, the Russian exporters and banks turn around and sell those dollars and euros for rubles, substituting for the central bank 3/n
At current trade volumes, exporters and Russian banks (the biggest and third biggest still have SWIFT access) can likely buy over $1.5 bn in rubles per day, 50% more than the central bank bought last Thursday using its reserves 4/n reuters.com/markets/europe…
Perversely, if the US UK EU eventually unfreeze Russian reserves, its central bank will have been able to preserve its own reserves while forcing exporters to stabilize the currency 5/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some news: I've got a book coming out about the @federalreserve and its efforts over the past fifteen years to hold together our increasingly dysfunctional monetary system.
Pre-order a copy using the link below! On sale May 10! 1/6
Part explainer, part critique, part proposal for reform, the book takes as its starting pt the following puzzle: from 1950-2008 the Fed's balance sheet was, by and large, a passive product of cash demand; now its an active tool of macroeconomic and fin mgmt. What happened? 2/6
The answer requires unpacking how money works in America: who creates it, on what terms, and for whose benefit. It also requires understanding how the Fed was designed to work (it was built to administer the banking system: to manage the quantity and quality of bank money). 3/6
(2/10) Just seven words stand between the President and the heads of many of these agencies—inefficiency, neglect of duty, malfeasance in office (INM).
(3/10) There is little consensus on what these words means or why Congress put them into over a dozen statutes.